Skip to main content

Probability Distribution of Dependency Distance of Mongolian Nouns

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chinese Lexical Semantics (CLSW 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14515))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

Based on the written and spoken language treebanks, this paper applies quantitative linguistics methods to statistically analyze Mongolian nouns and their dependency distance distributions. The results showed that the proportion of nouns in the Mongolian written language treebank was 35.58%, and the proportion of nouns and pronouns was 39.61%. In the Mongolian spoken language treebank, the proportion of nouns was 22.11%, and the proportion of nouns and pronouns was 33.12%. These findings closely align with results from prior research, further confirming the regularity of the proportion of nouns in human natural language. In terms of dependency distance distributions, the distributions of noun dependency distances in both the written and spoken treebanks fit the right-truncated Waring distribution and right-truncated modified Zipf-Alekseev distribution. This result is consistent with previous research. Moreover, the “long tail effect” can be seen from the fitting results, that is, as the dependency distance increases, its frequency decreases. This implies that there is also a tendency to minimize dependency distances in nouns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ferrer-i-Cancho, R.: Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. Phys. Rev. E 70(5), 1–5 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H.: Probability distribution of dependency distance. Glottometrics 15, 1–12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Q., Liu, H.: Does dependency distance distribute regularly? J. Zhejiang Univ. (Humanities Soc. Sci.) 46(4), 63–76 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Liu, H.: The effects of genre on dependency distance and dependency direction. Lang. Sci. 59, 135–147 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Liu, H.: Do English noun phrases tend to minimize dependency distance. Aust. J. Linguist. 40(2), 1–17 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, Y., Li, J., Bi, Y.: Research on Korean “Long-Before-Short” preference from the perspective of dependency distance. In: Su, Q., Xu, G., Yang, X. (eds.) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2022. LNCS, vol. 13496, pp. 132–142. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28956-9_11

  • Liu, H.: Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. J. Cogn. Sci. 9(02), 159–191 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H.: Dependency Grammar from Theory to Practice. Science Press, Beijing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Temperley, D.: Minimization of dependency length in written English. Cognition 105(2), 300–333 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temperley, D.: Dependency-length minimization in natural and artificial languages. J. Quant. Linguist. 15(3), 256–282 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E.: The dependency locality theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: Marantz, A., Miyashita, Y., O’Neil, W. (eds.) Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium, pp. 94–126. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, B.: Quantitative research on Chinese parts of speech. Stud. Chin. Lang. 6, 428–436 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R.: About 37% of word-tokens are nouns. Language 70(2), 331–339 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J., Liu, H.: Noun distribution in natural languages. Poznań Stud. Contemp. Linguist. 49(4), 509–529 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Duan, T., Liu, H.: Is the distribution of nouns an invariant in human languages?—an investigation based on written german corpora. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Humanit. Soc. Sci.) 49(6), 39–48 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D.: Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Inner Mongolia Normal University (2023JBYJ001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dulan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dulan, Dabhurbayar (2024). Probability Distribution of Dependency Distance of Mongolian Nouns. In: Dong, M., Hong, JF., Lin, J., Jin, P. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14515. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0586-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0586-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0585-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0586-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics