Abstract
In the theoretical framework of criminal law in our country, the study of crime is primarily focused on the perpetrator, and criminal legislation is predominantly concerned with defining crimes from the perspective of the perpetrator. This has resulted in a relatively weak understanding of the behavior of victims in criminal studies. However, the crime of dangerous driving is a typical minor offense in our criminal punishment system and a common traffic safety crime, making the issue of sentencing in such cases a matter of concern. This article aims to explore the causal effect of whether the victim forgives the offender on the severity of sentencing in dangerous driving cases. Methods: Firstly, based on various statutory and discretionary sentencing factors, features are extracted from judicial documents using a combination of regular expressions and annotation. After determining the significance of these features, variable selection is performed. A sentencing prediction model is constructed using the Stacking method on the selected variables. Then, causal effects of forgiveness on the severity of sentencing are estimated using conditional outcome model, grouped conditional outcome model, inverse probability weighting, and doubly robust method. Finally, bootstrap sampling is used to provide interval estimates of causal effects under different models. Results: Our research results indicate that, on average, defendants who receive forgiveness from the victim are 32.7% more likely to receive lighter penalties. Quantifying the impact of forgiveness on sentencing outcomes through causal inference methods helps clarify the role of forgiveness in the sentencing system of criminal cases in our country. It also addresses the insufficient research on the post-crime factor of victim attitude in criminal and punishment theories, providing further data references for the standardization of judicial practices in our country.
This work was partly supported by National Key R &D Program of China under Grant 2020YFC0832400. This work was partly supported by Key R &D Program of Sichuan Province under Grant 2021YFS0397.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chang, T.H., Nguyen, T.Q., Lee, Y., Jackson, J.W., Stuart, E.A.: Flexible propensity score estimation strategies for clustered data in observational studies. Stat. Med. 41(25), 5016–5032 (2022)
Chu, Z.: Research on the sentencing patterns of drunk driving offense. Politics Law 8, 30–41 (2013)
Gao, T.: The mechanism of compensation impact on sentencing in intentional injury cases. Legal Res. 1 (2020)
Han, J., Li, Z.: The influence of victim forgiveness on sentencing. J. Yunnan Police Officer Acad. 6, 73–77 (2011)
Hernán, M.A., Robins, J.M.: Causal inference (2010)
Kang, L., Vij, A., Hubbard, A., Shaw, D.: The unintended impact of helmet use on bicyclists’ risk-taking behaviors. J. Safety Res. 79, 135–147 (2021)
Künzel, S.R., Sekhon, J.S., Bickel, P.J., Yu, B.: Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116(10), 4156–4165 (2019)
Liu, X.: The Impact of Victim Forgiveness on Sentencing. Master’s thesis, Jiangxi Normal University (2020)
Neugebauer, R., van der Laan, M.: Why prefer double robust estimators in causal inference? J. Stat. Plann. Inference 129(1–2), 405–426 (2005)
Robins, J.: A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period-application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math. Modell. 7(9–12), 1393–1512 (1986)
Robins, J.M.: Marginal structural models versus structural nested models as tools for causal inference. In: Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials, pp. 95–133. Springer, Cham (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1284-3_2
Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55 (1983)
Sekhon, J.: The neyman-rubin model of causal inference and estimation via matching methods (2008)
Su, C., Wang, N.: Empirical study on the sentencing features and influencing factors of drunk driving offense: a case study in the central urban area of wuhan. J. South-Central Univ. Nationalities Humanities Soc. Sci. 38(1), 140–146 (2018)
Wen, J.: Empirical study on the sentencing factors of drunk driving offense. Legal Res. 1, 165–186 (2016)
Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5(2), 241–259 (1992)
Zhang, S.: Research on the Significance of Victim’s Behavior in Criminal Law. Ph.D. thesis, East China University of Political Science and Law (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, S., Weng, Y., Wang, X., Li, X. (2024). Exploring the Causal Relationship Between Forgiveness and Sentencing Outcomes in Dangerous Driving Cases. In: Hong, W., Kanaparan, G. (eds) Computer Science and Education. Computer Science and Technology. ICCSE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2023. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0730-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0730-0_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0729-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0730-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)