Skip to main content

Agent-Based Simulation of Decision-Making Under Uncertainty to Study Financial Precarity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14648))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

Financial insecurity in the U.S. is on the rise, accelerated by the growth of the gig economy and the associated income instability, increasing inequality, and the effects of algorithmic decision-making. Such insecurity has been studied within the framework of precarity – a concept that captures people’s latent uncertainty and precariousness. To alleviate precarity, we must study it. Precarity manifests over time as a sequence of events for an individual. Therefore, we must study individual trajectories, rather than the trajectory of aggregate properties of populations or snapshot analysis of an automated decision process. Doing so requires an agent behavior model that can simulate a number of related phenomena simultaneously: how individual consumption reacts to uncertainty in one’s financial status, how predictive tools impact income, and how utility-maximizing individuals behave in the long term. In this paper, we develop an agent-based simulation framework with realistic elements to examine the dynamics of precarity. Our model combines different threads of inquiry in economics and incorporates models of consumption, ruin, and investment. Our results illustrate how precarity, if ignored by policy-makers, can exacerbate the ill-effects of automated decision-making. Our framework also allows us to experiment with different strategies to mitigate precarity and evaluate their effectiveness.

The first two authors contributed equally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abebe, R., Kleinberg, J., Weinberg, S.M.: Subsidy allocations in the presence of income shocks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 05, pp. 7032–7039 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6188. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/6188

  2. Asmussen, S., Albrecher, H.: Ruin Probabilities, vol. 14. World Scientific, New Jersey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barberis, N.C.: Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: a review and assessment. J. Econ. Perspect. 27(1), 173–196 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayraktar, E., Young, V.R.: Maximizing utility of consumption subject to a constraint on the probability of lifetime ruin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., Zhu, S.: The wealth distribution in Bewley economies with capital income risk. J. Econ. Theory 159, 489–515 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Butler, J.: Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. Verso Books, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bütler, M.: Neoclassical life-cycle consumption: a textbook example. Econ. Theor. 17(1), 209–221 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickler, J.: With inflation stubbornly high, 58% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck: CNBC survey (2023). https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/11/58percent-of-americans-are-living-paycheck-to-paycheck-cnbc-survey-reveals.html

  9. Division of Consumer and Community Affairs: Economic well-being of US households in 2022 (2023). https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2022-report-economic-well-being-us-households-202305.pdf

  10. Donovan, S.A., Bradley, D.H., Shimabukuru, J.O.: What does the gig economy mean for workers? (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. El-Sibaie, A.: Tax brackets (2019). https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/2019-tax-brackets

  12. Eslami, M., Vaccaro, K., Lee, M.K., Elazari Bar On, A., Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K.: User attitudes towards algorithmic opacity and transparency in online reviewing platforms. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2019, pp. 1–14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300724

  13. Friedman, M.: The permanent income hypothesis. In: A Theory of the Consumption Function, pp. 20–37. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman, M.: Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy, B.L., Logan, T.D.: Racial economic inequality amid the COVID-19 crisis. The Hamilton Project 1, 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kac, M.: On distributions of certain Wiener functionals. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 65(1), 1–13 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kannan, S., Roth, A., Ziani, J.: Downstream effects of affirmative action. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* 2019, pp. 240–248. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287578

  18. Karatzas, I., Lehoczky, J.P., Sethi, S.P., Shreve, S.E.: Explicit solution of a general consumption/investment problem. Math. Oper. Res. 11(2), 261–294 (1986). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3689808

  19. Klügl, F., Kyvik Nordås, H.: Modelling agent decision making in agent-based simulation - analysis using an economic technology uptake model. In: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2023, pp. 1903–1911. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kushel, M., Moore, T.: Towards a new understanding: the California statewide study of people experiencing homelessness (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, L.T., Dean, S., Rolf, E., Simchowitz, M., Hardt, M.: Delayed impact of fair machine learning. In: Dy, J., Krause, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 80, pp. 3150–3158. PMLR, Stockholmsmassan, Stockholm Sweden (2018). https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/liu18c.html

  22. Ljungqvist, L., Sargent, T.J.: Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, Q., Stachurski, J., Toda, A.A.: The income fluctuation problem and the evolution of wealth. J. Econ. Theory 187, 105003 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Nokhiz, P., Ruwanpathirana, A.K., Patwari, N., Venkatasubramanian, S.: Precarity: modeling the long term effects of compounded decisions on individual instability. In: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2021, pp. 199–208. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462529

  25. Ritschard, G., Bussi, M., O’Reilly, J.: An index of precarity for measuring early employment insecurity. In: Ritschard, G., Studer, M. (eds.) Sequence Analysis and Related Approaches. Life Course Research and Social Policies, pp. 279–295. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95420-2_16

  26. Sargent, T., Stachurski, J.: Quantitative economics. Technical report, Citeseer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shin, Y.H., Lim, B.H.: Comparison of optimal portfolios with and without subsistence consumption constraints. Nonlinear Anal. 74(1), 50–58 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2010.08.014

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone, C.: Fiscal stimulus needed to fight recessions (2020). https://www.cbpp.org/research/economy/fiscal-stimulus-needed-to-fight-recessions

  29. Wakker, P.P.: Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family. Health Econ. 17(12), 1329–1344 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weller, C.: Working-class families are getting hit from all sides. Technical report, Center for American Progress (2018). https://www.americanprogress.org/article/working-class-families-getting-hit-sides/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grants from the MacArthur Foundation and the Ford Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aravinda Kanchana Ruwanpathirana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nokhiz, P., Ruwanpathirana, A.K., Patwari, N., Venkatasubramanian, S. (2024). Agent-Based Simulation of Decision-Making Under Uncertainty to Study Financial Precarity. In: Yang, DN., Xie, X., Tseng, V.S., Pei, J., Huang, JW., Lin, J.CW. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14648. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2238-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2238-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-2240-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-2238-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics