Skip to main content

An Automated Approach for Generating Conceptual Riddles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2024)

Abstract

One of the primary challenges in online learning environments is to retain learner engagement. Several different instructional strategies are proposed both in online and offline environments to enhance learner engagement. The Concept Attainment Model is one such instructional strategy that focuses on learners acquiring a deeper understanding of a concept rather than just its dictionary definition. This is done by searching and listing the properties used to distinguish examples from non-examples of various concepts. Our work attempts to apply the Concept Attainment Model to build conceptual riddles, to deploy over online learning environments. The approach involves creating factual triples from learning resources, classifying them based on their uniqueness to a concept into ‘Topic Markers’ and ‘Common’, followed by generating riddles based on the Concept Attainment Model’s format and capturing all possible solutions to those riddles. The results obtained from the human evaluation of riddles prove encouraging.

Supported by Gooru (https://gooru.org/).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://dbpedia.org/page/.

  2. 2.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#Cultural_impact.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/LIAAD/yake.

  4. 4.

    https://www.nltk.org/.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/csurfer/rake-nltk.

  6. 6.

    https://pypi.org/project/happytransformer/.

  7. 7.

    https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/index.

  8. 8.

    https://huggingface.co/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking.

  9. 9.

    https://pypi.org/project/gingerit/.

  10. 10.

    https://huggingface.co/.

  11. 11.

    https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.neighbors. KDTree.html.

References

  1. Martin, F., Borup, J.: Online learner engagement: conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educ. Psychol. 57(3), 162–177 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zerdoudİ, S., Tadjer, H., Lafİfİ, Y.: Study of learner’s engagement in online learning environments. Inter. J. Inform. Appli. Math. 6(1), 11-28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalani, A.: A study of the effectiveness of concept attainment model over conventional teaching method for teaching science in relation to achievement and retention. Inter. Res. J. 2(5), 436–437 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yi, J.: Effective ways to foster learning. Perform. Improv. 44(1), 34–38 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prince, M.: Does active learning work? a review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93(3), 223–231 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, A., Mathur, M.: Effect of concept attainment model on acquisition of physics concepts. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 1(3), 165–169 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Habib, H.: Effectiveness of concept attainment model of teaching on achievement of XII standard students in social sciences. Shanlax Inter. J. Educ. 7(3), 11–15 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Haetami, A., Maysara, M., Mandasari, E.C.: The effect of concept attainment model and mathematical logic intelligence on introductory chemistry learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran 53(3), 244-255 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joyce, B., Weil, M., Calhoun, E.: Models of teaching (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doolittle, J.H.: Using riddles and interactive computer games to teach problem-solving skills. Teach. Psychol. 22(1), 33–36 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Denny, R.A., et al.: Elementary Who am I riddles. J. Chem. Educ. 77(4), 477 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaham, H.: The riddle as a learning and educational tool. Creat. Educ. 4(06), 388 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sultan, A.Z., Hamzah, N., Rusdi, M.: Implementation of simulation based-concept attainment method to increase interest learning of engineering mechanics topic. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 953(1) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ritchie, G.: The JAPE riddle generator: technical specification. Institute for Communicating and Collaborative Systems (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Waller, A., et al.: Evaluating the standup pun generating software with children with cerebral palsy. ACM Trans. Accessible Comput. (TACCESS) 1(3), 1–27 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Colton, S.: Automated puzzle generation. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2002 Symposium on AI and Creativity in the Arts and Science (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pintér, B., et al.: Automated word puzzle generation using topic models and semantic relatedness measures. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae, Sectio Computatorica, vol. 36 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guerrero, I., et al.: TheRiddlerBot: a next step on the ladder towards computational creativity. In: Toivonen, H., et al. (ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Galván, P., et al.: Riddle generation using word associations. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tyler, B., Wilsdon, K., Bodily, P.M.: Computational humor: automated pun generation. In: ICCC (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khandelwal, U., et al.: Generalization through memorization: Nearest neighbor language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00172 (2019)

  22. Johnson, J., Douze, M., Jégou, H.: Billion-scale similarity search with gpus. IEEE Trans. Big Data 7(3), 535–547 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malkov, Y.A., Yashunin, D.A.: Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using hierarchical navigable small world graphs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 42(4), 824–836 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bintz, W.P., et al.: Using literature to teach inference across the curriculum. Voices Middle 20(1), 16 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehmann, J., et al.: Dbpedia-a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia. Semantic web 6(2), 167–195 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niharika Sri Parasa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parasa, N.S., Diwan, C., Srinivasa, S., Ram, P. (2024). An Automated Approach for Generating Conceptual Riddles. In: Yang, DN., Xie, X., Tseng, V.S., Pei, J., Huang, JW., Lin, J.CW. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14650. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2266-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2266-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-2265-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-2266-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics