Skip to main content

Uncovering Students’ Processing Tactics Towards ChatGPT’s Feedback in EFL Education Using Learning Analytics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blended Learning. Intelligent Computing in Education (ICBL 2024)

Abstract

ChatGPT, a promising chatbot program based on generative artificial intelligence (GAI), shows significant promise for its potential use in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education. By engaging in dialogue with students, it provides personalized support for their reading and writing, which are fundamental aspects of EFL instruction. Although research on students’ interaction with ChatGPT is emerging, there is a lack of focus on their Processing Tactic towards ChatGPT’s Feedback (PTCF) and its impact on learning outcomes. To mitigate this gap, we employed a learning analytic method combining cluster analysis and process mining to analyze multimodal data generated during their reading and writing tasks. The analysis identified three clusters of students’ PTCF: (1) Silence with no response, (2) Passive dependence, and (3) Active construction. By conducting sequence analysis on these behavior patterns, it was found that learners adopted three learning modes when using ChatGPT, which are Comprehension-focused, Tool-inspired, and Thinking-alienator. The findings also revealed differences in learning gains among groups of students with varying learning modes, specifically in the improvement of domain knowledge. Implications of these findings for both practical application and future research were also discussed later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keh, C.L.: Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELT J. 44(4), 294–304 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P., Khan, S., Khan, I.H.: Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Eval. 3(2), 100115 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oravec, J.A.: Artificial intelligence implications for academic cheating: expanding the dimensions of responsible human-AI collaboration with ChatGPT. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 34(2), 213–237 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cotton, D.R., Cotton, P.A., Shipway, J.R.: Chatting and cheating: ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International (ahead-of-print) 1–12 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Praphan, P.W., Praphan, K.: AI technologies in the ESL/EFL writing classroom: the villain or the champion? J. Second. Lang. Writ. 62, 101072 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zuckerman, M., et al.: ChatGPT for assessment writing. Med. Teach. 45(11), 1224–1227 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayed, J.M., Carlon, M.K.J., Oriola, A.M., Cross, J.S.: Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 3, 100055 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tlili, A., et al.: What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn. Environ. 10(1), 15 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Adeshola, I., Adepoju, A.P.: The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learn. Environ. 1–14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858

  10. Nisar, S., Aslam, M.S.: Is ChatGPT a good tool for T&CM students in studying pharmacology? Available at SSRN 4324310 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baidoo-Anu, D., Ansah, L.O.: Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. J. AI 7(1), 52–62 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song, C., Song, Y.: Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Front. Psychol. 14, 1260843 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kiryakova, G., Angelova, N.: ChatGPT—a challenging tool for the university professors in their teaching practice. Educ. Sci. 13(10), 1056 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawanti, S., Zubaydulloevna, K.M.: AI chatbot-based learning: alleviating students’ anxiety in English writing classroom. Bull. Soc. Inform. Theory Appl. 7(2), 182–192 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Imran, M., Almusharraf, N.: Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: a systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educ. Technol. 15(4), ep464 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malinka, K., Peresíni, M., Firc, A., Hujnák, O., Janus, F.: On the educational impact of ChatGPT: Is artificial intelligence ready to obtain a university degree? In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, vol. 1. pp. 47–53 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Z., Ma, Y., Yang, X., Li, K.: Impact of ChatGPT-based reading platforms on the academic reading ability of graduate students (in Chinese). Open Educ. Res. 29(06), 60–68 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hyland, K., Hyland, F.: Feedback on second language students’ writing. Lang. Teach. 39(2), 83–101 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao, Y., Zhi, Y.: An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: experience and perceptions. Languages 8(3), 212 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai, W., et al.: Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 323–325. IEEE (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wei, J., et al.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 24824–24837 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han, J., et al.: Exploring student-ChatGPT dialogue in EFL writing education. In: 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saint, J., Fan, Y., Singh, S., Gasevic, D., Pardo, A.: Using process mining to analyse self-regulated learning: a systematic analysis of four algorithms. In: LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 333–343 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Project Key Project of Beijing Social Science Foundation "Research on Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Development" (No. 23JYA004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yizhou Fan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Su, H., Tong, Y., Zhang, X., Fan, Y. (2024). Uncovering Students’ Processing Tactics Towards ChatGPT’s Feedback in EFL Education Using Learning Analytics. In: Ma, W.W.K., Li, C., Fan, C.W., U, L.H., Lu, A. (eds) Blended Learning. Intelligent Computing in Education. ICBL 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14797. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4442-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4442-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-4441-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-4442-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics