Skip to main content

Optimize Rule Mining Based on Constraint Learning in Knowledge Graph

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2024)

Abstract

Knowledge graph completion (KGC) involves inferring unknown triples from known ones to improve the completeness and richness of information and semantics in knowledge graphs (KG). Most existing KGC works are dominated by the embedding method, but it fails to explain the predicted triples. Rule mining methods can achieve this, but it is challenging to mine rules from a large KG under the open-world assumption. Although several mining methods have already addressed this issue, those based on search lack the ability to learn during the search process, which leads to the generation of ineffective rules. In this paper, answer set programming is used to convert search-failed rules into constraints to avoid rule specializations. Through constraint learning, the search process is continuously improved to optimize mining. Additionally, this paper utilizes the embedding method to pre-enhance KG and introduces a comprehensive evaluation approach to tackle the weak generalization of the rule mining method. Extensive experiments show that the proposed method achieves the best accuracy and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balažević, I., Allen, C., Hospedales, T.M.: Tucker: Tensor factorization for knowledge graph completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09590 (2019)

  2. Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Garcia-Duran, A., Weston, J., Yakhnenko, O.: Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cropper, A., Dumančić, S.: Inductive logic programming at 30: a new introduction. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 74, 765–850 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cropper, A., Morel, R.: Learning programs by learning from failures. Mach. Learn. 110, 801–856 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dettmers, T., Minervini, P., Stenetorp, P., Riedel, S.: Convolutional 2D knowledge graph embeddings. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galárraga, L., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., Suchanek, F.M.: Fast rule mining in ontological knowledge bases with AMIE+. VLDB J. 24(6), 707–730 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gebser, M., Kaminski, R., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T.: Multi-shot asp solving with Clingo. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 19(1), 27–82 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gu, Z., Chen, H.: Knowledge graph representation learning based on automatic network search for link prediction. CMES-Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 135(3) (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, G., Pontelli, E., Ali, K.A., Carlsson, M., Hermenegildo, M.V.: Parallel execution of prolog programs: a survey. ACM Trans. Programm. Lang. Syst. (TOPLAS) 23(4), 472–602 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kazemi, S.M., Poole, D.: Simple embedding for link prediction in knowledge graphs. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liang, S., Shao, J., Zhang, D., Zhang, J., Cui, B.: DRGI: deep relational graph infomax for knowledge graph completion. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meilicke, C., Chekol, M.W., Ruffinelli, D., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Anytime bottom-up rule learning for knowledge graph completion. In: IJCAI, pp. 3137–3143 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S.: End-to-end differentiable proving. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schlichtkrull, M., Kipf, T.N., Bloem, P., van den Berg, R., Titov, I., Welling, M.: Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In: Gangemi, A., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 10843, pp. 593–607. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Toutanova, K., Chen, D.: Observed versus latent features for knowledge base and text inference. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality, pp. 57–66 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vashishth, S., Sanyal, S., Nitin, V., Agrawal, N., Talukdar, P.: Interacte: improving convolution-based knowledge graph embeddings by increasing feature interactions. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 3009–3016 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, Z., Ye, P., Li, J., Chen, H., Zhang, W.: Differentiable learning of rules with constants in knowledge graph. Knowl.-Based Syst. 275, 110686 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, F., Yang, Z., Cohen, W.W.: Differentiable learning of logical rules for knowledge base reasoning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, C., Hsu, C.N., Katsis, Y., Kim, H.C., Vázquez-Baeza, Y.: Theoretical rule-based knowledge graph reasoning by connectivity dependency discovery. In: 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangfeng Luo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cai, K., Wang, X., Luo, X. (2024). Optimize Rule Mining Based on Constraint Learning in Knowledge Graph. In: Cao, C., Chen, H., Zhao, L., Arshad, J., Asyhari, T., Wang, Y. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14886. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5498-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5498-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-5497-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-5498-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics