Skip to main content

Designing Performance Indicator in Human-Centered Agile Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Centred Intelligent Systems (KES-HCIS 2023)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 359))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 284 Accesses

Abstract

Advances in information technology are transforming the value provided to customers and business models for delivering value. Pharmaceutical companies, which are required to provide safe and reliable products, are also building digital platforms to comply with regulatory and user requirements and to improve the efficiency of manufacturing and quality control. In order to be accountable for the reliability of their products and services, they need to continuously assess their performance in the process of digital transformation.

However, there is no established method to dynamically design and manage performance indicators in the process from the verification of concept of a new product to its deployment to the business. In this report, we propose a method for deriving dynamic performance indicators for corporate digital transformation using a design thinking approach. This method enables more dynamic and flexible design and review of performance indicators, instead of the conventional static performance indicators centered on financial perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Singh, M., Sachan, S., Singh, A., & Singh, K. K. (2020). Internet of Things in pharma industry: possibilities and challenges, pp. 195–216 Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma, A., Kaur, J., Singh, I.: IoT in pharmaceutical manufacturing, warehousing, and supply chain management. SN Comput. Sci. 1(4), 1–10 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Szlezak, N., Evers, M., Wang, J., Pérez, L.: The role of big data and advanced analytics in drug discovery, development, and commercialization. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 95(5), 492–495 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Resman, M., Pipan, M., Šimic, M., Herakovič, N.: A new architecture model for smart manufacturing: a performance analysis and comparison with the RAMI 4.0 reference model. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag, 14(2), 153–165 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miura, K., Kobayashi, N., Shirasaka, S.: A strategic performance indicator deriving framework for evaluating organizational change. Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 9(4), 36–46 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schulz, C., Schweda, C.M.: Exemplifying a Framework for Interrelating Enterprise Architecture Concerns. In: Sicilia, M.-A., Kop, C., Sartori, F. (eds.) ONTOSE 2010. LNBIP, vol. 62, pp. 33–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16496-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Tamm, T., Seddon, P.B., Shanks, G., Reynolds, P.: How does enterprise architecture add value to organizations? Commun. Assoc. Inform Syst. 28(1), 141–168 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Masuda, Y., Shirasaka, S., Yamamoto, S., Hardjono, A.B., Practices in Adaptive Enterprise Architecture with Digital Platform: A Case of Global Healthcare Enterprise, T.: International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems. IGI Global. 14, 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Masuda, Y., Zimmerman, A., Shepard, D. S., Schmidt, R., Shirasaka, S.: An adaptive enterprise architecture design for a digital healthcare platform: toward digitized society-industry 4.0, Society 5.0. In: 2021 IEEE 25th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), (pp. 138–146) (2021). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon, J.R., Nanni, A.J., Vollmann, T.E.: New performance challenge: Measuring operations for world-class competition. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, Homewood (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. Calif. Manage. Rev. 39(1), 53–79 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bourne, M., Melnyk, S., Bititci, U.S.: Performance measurement and management: theory and practice. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 38(11), 2010–2021 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., Nudurupati, S.: Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14(3), 305–327 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi, P.H., Lipsey, M.W., Henry, G.T.: Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage publications (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Organization for standardization (2008), ISO9001:2008 Quality management systems – requirements

    Google Scholar 

  16. ICH. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline: Pharmaceutical Quality System Q10; June, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lawrence, X.Y., Kopcha, M.: The future of pharmaceutical quality and the path to get there. Int. J. Pharm. 528(1–2), 354–359 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arling, E.R., Dowling, M.E., Frankel, P.A.: Creating and managing a quality management system. Pharmaceutical Sciences Encyclopedia: Drug Discovery, Development, and Manufacturing, pp. 1–48 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Iizuka, Y., Nagata, Y.: Introduction to Modern Quality Management (Japaneses). Asakura Publishing Co., Ltd (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Curedale, R.: Design Thinking Processes & Methods. Design Community College, Los Angeles, (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stanford d.school bootcamp bootleg, https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg

  22. Peterson, K., Wohlin, C., Baca, D.: The waterfall model in large-scale development, in International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 2009, S. 386–400

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J., The agile manifesto, Software development, Bd. 9, Nr. 28–35, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  24. Qurashi, S.A., Qureshi, M.: Scrum of scrum solution for large size teams using scrum methodology, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1408.6142 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leffingwell, SAFe 4.5 reference guide: scaled agile framework for lean enterprises. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ambler, S.W., Lines, M.: Disciplined agile delivery: A practitioner’s guide to agile software delivery in the enterprise. IBM press, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  27. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasei Miura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Miura, K., Masuda, Y., Shirasaka, S. (2023). Designing Performance Indicator in Human-Centered Agile Development. In: Zimmermann, A., Howlett, R., Jain, L.C. (eds) Human Centred Intelligent Systems. KES-HCIS 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 359. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3424-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics