Skip to main content

Recent Challenges in a New Distributed Learning Paradigm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile Internet Security (MobiSec 2022)

Abstract

The majority of online transactions between the parties can be reported in real-time publicly by relying on smart contracts (SCs) and federated learning (FL). They are both decentralized and reinforced. By aggregating the gradient values from client devices, FL enables a large number of clients to create deep learning models anonymously. Yet, it lacks an incentive system for the contributing clients. Conversely, since self-executing contracts with immutable data records are resilient to failure, the virtues of SCs can be a tenable solution as an incentive mechanism in the FL system. The clients can claim the rewards by providing a proof transaction function and stating their contribution arbitrarily through SCs. However, because the transactions are made public, directly implementing SCs in the CL system could jeopardize the users’ privacy. The observer can deduce the characteristics of the client’s resources. Therefore, in this research, we elaborate on the critical points to be taken into account in adopting SCs as an incentive mechanism for the FL environment. We also state an empirical investigation and the open challenges that can address the aforementioned issues and concerns. Eventually, we recapitulate the essential points to be considered in developing a new distributed learning paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Casino, F., et al.: Blockchain-based food supply chain traceability: a case study in the dairy sector. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59(19), 5758–5770 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IoT analytics. https://iot-analytics.com/state-of-the-iot-update/. Accessed 17 Aug 2022

  3. Marjani, M., et al.: Big IoT data analytics: architecture, opportunities, and open research challenges. IEEE Access 5, 5247–5261 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mamoshina, P., et al.: Converging blockchain and next-generation artificial intelligence technologies to decentralize and accelerate biomedical research and healthcare. Oncotarget 9(5), 5665 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., et al.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, H.M., Laskowski, M.: Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. 25(1), 18–27 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salah, K., Rehman, M.H.U., Nizamuddin, N., Al-Fuqaha, A.: Blockchain for AI review and open research challenges. IEEE Access 7, 10127–10149 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blockchain Explorer. The latest transaction and blocks of eth smart contracts (2022). https://www.blockchain.com/explorer. Accessed 15 Sept 2022

  9. Kiffer, L., Levin, D., Mislove, A.: Analyzing ethereum’s contract topology. In: Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018, pp. 494–499. ACM Digital Library (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonawitz, K., et al.: Towards federated learning at scale: system design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01046 (2019)

  11. Firdaus, M., Rahmadika, S., Rhee, K.-H.: Decentralized trusted data sharing management on internet of vehicle edge computing (IoVEC) networks using consortium blockchain. Sensors 21(7), 1–20 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan, L.U., et al.: Federated learning for edge networks: resource optimization and incentive mechanism. IEEE Commun. Mag. 58(10), 88–93 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qu, Y., Pokhrel, S.R., Garg, S., Gao, L., Xiang, Y.: A blockchained federated learning framework for cognitive computing in industry 4.0 networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 17, 2964–2973 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seuwou, P., Adegoke, V.F.: The changing global landscape with emerging technologies and their implications for smart societies. In: Handbook of Research on 5G Networks and Advancements in Computing, Electronics, and Electrical Engineering, pp. 402–423. IGI Global (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rahmadika, S., Rhee, K.-H.: Reliable collaborative learning with commensurate incentive schemes. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), pp. 496–502. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blockchain transaction report. https://worldpaymentsreport.com. Accessed 5 June 2019

  17. McMahan, H.B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Arcas, B.A.Y.: Federated learning of deep networks using model averaging. arXiv:1602.05629 (2018)

  18. Kumar, P., Garg, S., Singh, A., Batra, S., Kumar, N., You, I.: MVO-based 2-D path planning scheme for providing quality of service in UAV environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 5(3), 1698–1707 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rahmadika, S., Rhee, K.-H.: Enhancing data privacy through a decentralised predictive model with blockchain-based revenue. Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput. 37(1), 1–15 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, R., Guo, J., Wang, D.C., Tsai, J.J., Al-Hamadi, H., You, I.: Trust-based service management for mobile cloud IoT systems. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 16(1), 246–263 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Melis, L., Song, C., De Cristofaro, E., Shmatikov, V.: Exploiting unintended feature leakage in collaborative learning. In: 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 691–706. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rahmadika, S., Rhee, K.-H.: Unlinkable collaborative learning transactions: privacy-awareness in decentralized approaches. IEEE Access 9, 65293–65307 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Melis, L., Song, C., De Cristofaro, E., Shmatikov, V.: Inference attacks against collaborative learning. CoRR, abs/1805.04049 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bhagoji, A.N., Chakraborty, S., Mittal, P., Calo, S.: Analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens. CoRR, abs/1811.12470 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bagdasaryan, E., Veit, A., Hua, Y., Estrin, D., Shmatikov, V.: How to backdoor federated learning. CoRR, abs/1807.00459 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fung, C., Yoon, C.J.M., Beschastnikh, I.: Mitigating sybils in federated learning poisoning. CoRR, abs/1808.04866 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandi Rahmadika .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rahmadika, S., Fajri, B.R., Farell, G., Hadi, A., Budayawan, K. (2023). Recent Challenges in a New Distributed Learning Paradigm. In: You, I., Kim, H., Angin, P. (eds) Mobile Internet Security. MobiSec 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1644. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4430-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4430-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4429-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4430-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics