Abstract
This paper aims to explore the effective mode of computer-assisted corrective feedback applied to foreign language teaching. Through experimental design, it focuses on the corrective effects of different feedback methods, including immediate effects and delayed effects. The results of statistical analysis show that written corrective feedback is generally effective, indicating that corrective feedback as a teaching method can promote foreign language learning; and that the effect of metalinguistic corrective feedback is the best, indicating that the effect of corrective feedback is basically positively correlated the degree of dominance of the feedback method; and that the effect of test time on the effectiveness of corrective feedback is negatively correlated with the degree of dominance of the feedback method. The methods and findings of this study can provide a reference for further research on second language grammar acquisition in the computer communication environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Long, M.H.: Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Appl. Linguis. 4(2), 126–141 (1983)
Heen, Y.: The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Q. 41, 255–283 (2007)
Bitchener, J., Knoch, U.: The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: a ten-month investigation. Appl. Linguis. 31, 193–214 (2009)
Shintani, N., Aubrey, S.: The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer-mediated environment. Mod. Lang. J. 100(1), 296–319 (2016)
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., Suzuki, W.: Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Lang. Learn. 64(1), 103–131 (2014)
Stefanou, C., Revesz, A.: Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. Mod. Lang. J. 2, 263–282 (2015)
Truscott, J., Hsu, A.Y.: Error correction, revision, and learning. J. Second. Lang. Writ. 17(4), 292–305 (2008)
Yu, R., Yang, L.: ESL/EFL learners’ responses to teacher written feedback: reviewing a recent decade of empirical studies. Front Psychol. 12, 735101 (2021)
Robb, T.L., Ross, S.M., Shortreed, I.: Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Q. 20(1), 83–96 (2012)
Kang, E.Y., Han, Z.: The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: a meta-analysis. Mod. Lang. J. 99(1), 1–18 (2015)
Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., Ketwan, P.: EFL students’ preferences for written corrective feedback: do error types, language proficiency, and foreign language enjoyment matter? Front Psychol. 12, 660564 (2021)
Guo, X., Yang, Y.: Effects of corrective feedback on EFL learners’ acquisition of third-person singular form and the mediating role of cognitive style. J. Psycholinguist Res. 47(4), 841–858 (2018)
Ellis, N.C.: At the interface: how explicit knowledge affects implicit language learning. Stud. Second. Lang. Acquis. 27, 305–352 (2005)
Yang, Y., Lyster, R.: Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Stud. Second. Lang. Acquis. 32(2), 235–263 (2010)
Zhang, J., Cao, X., Zheng, N.: How learners’ corrective feedback beliefs modulate their oral accuracy: a comparative study on high - and low-accuracy learners of Chinese as a second language. Front Psychol. 13, 869468 (2022)
Tsao, J.J., Tseng, W.T., Wang, C.: The effects of writing anxiety and motivation on EFL college students’ self-evaluative judgments of corrective feedback. Psychol Rep. 120(2), 219–241 (2017)
Cheng, X., Zhang, L.J.: Teacher written feedback on English as a foreign language learners’ writing: examining native and nonnative English-Speaking teachers’ practices in feedback provision. Front Psychol. 12, 629921 (2021)
Li, S., Roshan, S.: The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. J. Second. Lang. Writ. 45, 1–15 (2019)
Benson, S., DeKeyser, R.: Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Lang. Teach. Res. 23(6), 702–726 (2019)
Zheng, Y., Yu, S.: Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: a case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assess. Writ. 37, 13–24 (2018)
Ellis, R.: A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT J. 63(2), 97–107 (2008)
Latif, A., Muhammad, M.: Toward a new process-based indicator for measuring writing fluency: evidence from L2 writers’ think-aloud protocols. Can. Mod. Lang. Rev. / La revue ca. 4, 99–105 (2009)
Schmidt, R.: The role of consciousness in second language learning. Appl. Linguis. 11, 129–158 (1990)
Schmidt, R.: Awareness and second language acquisition. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 13, 206–226 (1993)
Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., Fearnow, S.: Testing the output hypothesis: effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Stud. Second. Lang. Acquis. 21(3), 421–452 (1999)
Robert, M.: DeKeyser: the robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Stud. Second. Lang. Acquis. 22(4), 499–533 (2000)
Polio, C.: The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. J. Second. Lang. Writ. 21(4), 375–389 (2012)
Schmidt, R.: Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu (1995)
Zhang, K., Li, B., Chen, K.Q.: The effectiveness of teachers’ written corrective feedback for L2 development: an explanatory sequential mixed-method study. Mod. Foreign Lang. 42(3), 363–373 (2019)
Diab, N.M.: Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: does type of error and type of correction matter? Assess. Writ. 24, 16–34 (2015)
Lv, M.L., Guan, Y.P., Tang, J.M.: An empirical study on foreign language learners’ anxiety under synchronous computer-mediated communication mode. J. PLA Univ. Foreign Lang. 39(3), 28–36 (2016)
Acknowledgments
The work was substantially supported by The Anhui Education Bureau 2023 Social Science Fund for Higher Education, Lingjiatan Culture Translation and Communication Strategy Research from the Perspective of Convergence Media and by The Anhui Education Bureau 2021 Education and Teaching Research Project, A Study on the Development of Intercultural Foreign Language Teaching Competence of Applied Undergraduate Teachers Based on Community of Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xu, J. (2023). Research on the Application of Computer Aided Corrective Feedback in Foreign Language Grammar Teaching. In: Zhang, H., et al. International Conference on Neural Computing for Advanced Applications. NCAA 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1870. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5847-4_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5847-4_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5846-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5847-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)