Abstract
The objective of this study is to compare the interfaces of two FURS (Flexible Ureterorenoscopy) robotic operation consoles across generations. Analyzing functional requirements during surgery, the first-generation interface was designed. Evaluation of the first-generation interface, combined with user needs and design principles, informed the design of the second-generation interface, which aimed to improve the usability of the console during surgery. Both interface generations were assessed for usability and user experience using the System Usability Scale (SUS).The results indicate improvement in usability and user satisfaction following interface iteration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wen, Z.: Clinical application and evaluation of ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Southern Medical University, Ph.D. dissertation (2014)
Gao, L., Lin, L., Yan, G., Rong, R.: Advancements in medical robotics. Chin. J. Med. Instrum. 06, 341–344 (1997)
Lu, R.: Recent developments in artificial intelligence. Comput. Eng. Appl. 04, 1–14+48 (1987)
Long, Q.: European urology: a new robot FURS: development and early clinical research (IDEAL stage 1–2b). Mod. Urol. J. 20(02), 131–132 (2015)
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. In: Bainbridge, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 445–456. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)
Morville, P., Rosenfeld, L.: Information Architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale web sites. O'Reilly Media, Inc. (2006)
Lai, J., Honda, T., Yang, M.C.: A study of the role of user-centered design methods in design team projects. Ai Edam 24(3), 303–316 (2010)
Wilson, C.: Interview techniques for UX practitioners: a user-centered design method. Newnes (2013)
Lynch, P.J.: Visual design for the user interface, Part 1: design fundamentals. J. Biocommun. 21, 22 (1994)
Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 24(6), 574–594 (2008)
Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12
Lund, A.M.: Measuring usability with the use questionnaire12. Usability Interface 8(2), 3–6 (2001)
Fruhling, A., Lee, S.: Assessing the reliability, validity and adaptability of PSSUQ. In: AMCIS 2005 Proceedings, p. 378 (2005)
Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)
Tullis, T.S., Stetson, J.N.: A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability ABSTRACT: introduction. In: Usability Professional Association Conference
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Scientific Research Item of Zhejiang Lab under Grant No. 2022NB0AC01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
You, Y. et al. (2023). Usability Evaluation of FURS Robot Control Panel Interface Design Based on SUS. In: Yang, H., et al. Intelligent Robotics and Applications. ICIRA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14271. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6495-6_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6495-6_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-6494-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-6495-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)