Skip to main content

Black-Box Fairness Testing with Shadow Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communications Security (ICICS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14252))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 720 Accesses

Abstract

Discrimination in decision-making systems is of growing concern as machine learning techniques (especially deep learning) are increasingly applied in systems with societal impact. Multiple recent works have proposed to identify/generate discriminative samples through fairness testing. State-of-the-art fairness testing methods can efficiently generate many discriminative samples, which can be subsequently used to improve the fairness of the model. Unfortunately, the applicability of these approaches is limited in practice as they require the availability of both the model and the training data, i.e., a white-box setting. In a black-box setting (e.g., testing online services), existing approaches are impractical for multiple reasons, e.g., they require huge testing budgets. In this work, we propose a black-box fairness testing approach for neural networks, namely BREAM, which addresses two challenges, i.e., how to generate many discriminative samples without querying many times and how to guide the searching without the original model. Our overall idea is to obtain approximate gradients by training shadow models to effectively guide the discriminative sample generation for black-box DNNs. We also observe the density diversity of the distribution of discrimination, which enables incremental maintenance of shadow models and rational allocation of search resources by dividing multiple subspaces. We evaluated BREAM on three widely adopted datasets for fairness research. The results show that BREAM achieves a 9X higher performance than existing black-box methods, comparable to the state-of-the-art white-box fairness method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Code of black-box fairness testing with shadow models. https://github.com/lenijwp/Black-box-Discrimination-Finder

  2. Embedding api-build faster great ai algorithms for hr. https://hrflow.ai/embedding/

  3. Aggarwal, A., Lohia, P., Nagar, S., Dey, K., Saha, D.: Black box fairness testing of machine learning models. In: Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 625–635 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L.: Machine bias. ProPublica, 23 May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. Batina, L., Bhasin, S., Jap, D., Picek, S.: CSI NN: reverse engineering of neural network architectures through electromagnetic side channel. In: 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), pp. 515–532. USENIX Association, Santa Clara, CA, August 2019. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity19/presentation/batina

  6. Bojarski, M., et al.: End to end learning for self-driving cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.07316 (2016)

  7. Cherian, V., Bindu, M.: Heart disease prediction using Naive Bayes algorithm and laplace smoothing technique. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Trends Technol. 5(2), 68–73 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chollet, F., et al.: Keras (2015). https://github.com/keras-team/keras

  9. Corbett-Davies, S., Goel, S.: The measure and mismeasure of fairness: a critical review of fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.00023 (2018)

  10. Dua, D., Graff, C.: UCI adult data set (2017). https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/adult

  11. Dua, D., Graff, C.: UCI bank marketing data set (2017). https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/bank+marketing

  12. Dua, D., Graff, C.: UCI machine learning repository (2017). https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  13. Dua, D., Graff, C.: UCI statlog (german credit data) data set (2017). https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/statlog+(german+credit+data)

  14. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fan, M., Wei, W., Jin, W., Yang, Z., Liu, T.: Explanation-guided fairness testing through genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 871–882 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman, M., Friedler, S.A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., Venkatasubramanian, S.: Certifying and removing disparate impact. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 259–268 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferral, K.: Wisconsin supreme court allows state to continue using computer program to assist in sentencing. the capital times, 13 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  18. Galhotra, S., Brun, Y., Meliou, A.: Fairness testing: testing software for discrimination. In: Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 498–510 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goh, G., Cotter, A., Gupta, M., Friedlander, M.P.: Satisfying real-world goals with dataset constraints. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2415–2423 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. HLEG, A.: High-level expert group on artificial intelligence. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, G., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Ren, J., Cheng, Y., Zhao, X.: Automatic classification method for software vulnerability based on deep neural network. IEEE Access 7, 28291–28298 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamiran, F., Calders, T., Pechenizkiy, M.: Discrimination aware decision tree learning. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 869–874. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Asoh, H., Sakuma, J.: Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer. In: Flach, P.A., De Bie, T., Cristianini, N. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7524, pp. 35–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33486-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Liang, L., Zheng, K., Sheng, Q., Huang, X.: A denial of service attack method for an IoT system. In: 2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), pp. 360–364. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lloyd, S.P.: Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. 28(2), 129–137 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Oh, S.J., Augustin, M., Schiele, B., Fritz, M.: Towards reverse-engineering black-box neural networks (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Olson, P.: The algorithm that beats your bank manager. CNN money, 15 March 2011

    Google Scholar 

  28. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z.B., Swami, A.: Practical black-box attacks against machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 506–519 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: Why should i trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135–1144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ribeiro, M.T., Wu, T., Guestrin, C., Singh, S.: Beyond accuracy: behavioral testing of NLP models with checklist. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04118 (2020)

  31. Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., Philbin, J.: Facenet: a unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 815–823 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schuba, C.L., Krsul, I.V., Kuhn, M.G., Spafford, E.H., Sundaram, A., Zamboni, D.: Analysis of a denial of service attack on TCP. In: Proceedings. 1997 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No. 97CB36097), pp. 208–223. IEEE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sweeney, L.: Discrimination in online ad delivery. Queue 11(3), 10–29 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Szegedy, C., et al.: Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6199 (2013)

  35. Tramer, F., et al.: Fairtest: discovering unwarranted associations in data-driven applications. In: 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS &P), pp. 401–416. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tramèr, F., Zhang, F., Juels, A., Reiter, M.K., Ristenpart, T.: Stealing machine learning models via prediction APIs. In: 25th \(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security Symposium (\(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security 16), pp. 601–618 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Udeshi, S., Arora, P., Chattopadhyay, S.: Automated directed fairness testing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 98–108 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, B., Gong, N.Z.: Stealing hyperparameters in machine learning. In: 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 36–52. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yu, H., et al.: Cloudleak: large-scale deep learning models stealing through adversarial examples. In: Proceedings of Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium (NDSS) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, B.H., Lemoine, B., Mitchell, M.: Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 335–340 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M.: Efficient white-box fairness testing through gradient search. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pp. 103–114 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, L., Wu, Y., Wu, X.: Achieving non-discrimination in data release. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1335–1344 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, P., et al.: White-box fairness testing through adversarial sampling. In: 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, P., et al.: White-box fairness testing through adversarial sampling (2020). https://github.com/pxzhang94/ADF

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1406900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2018, 62161160337, U20B2049, U1736205, 61802166, 62102359, 62006181, 62132011, U20A20177, 62206217), State Key Laboratory of Communication Content Cognition (Grant No. A02103) and Shaanxi Province Key Industry Innovation Program (2023-ZDLGY-38, 2021ZDLGY01-02). Chao Shen is the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Shen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jiang, W., Shen, C., Lin, C., Wang, J., Sun, J., Gao, X. (2023). Black-Box Fairness Testing with Shadow Models. In: Wang, D., Yung, M., Liu, Z., Chen, X. (eds) Information and Communications Security. ICICS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14252. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7356-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7356-9_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7355-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7356-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics