Abstract
Scholarly communication through video by various people and institutions has spread more and more in recent years and impacts the dissemination of scholarly knowledge and people’s daily lives. However, most of the previous works were conducted to measure the impacts of these research outputs as Altmetrics studies; little is known about characteristics and trends of scholarly articles and their associated videos. E.g., how many of these articles and videos are available since when?, and who has been publishing these videos? Hence, we analyzed 410,101 articles with 228,192 unique DOIs referenced in 137,629 videos uploaded by 39,416 channels, using data provided by Altmetric.com. As a result, the total number of scholarly references on YouTube has increased rapidly since 2016 and has continued to grow. The top research fields of scholarly articles were Clinical Medicine and Multidisciplinary consistently. The most common channels in the number of videos associated with scholarly references were hosted by publishers and academic societies, SciShow, and other individuals/organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggarwal, V.: Visual abstracts do not increase some impact scores more than conventional abstracts of clinical research: a retrospective cohort study. Health Inf. Lib. J. 38(4), 259–267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12376
Allgaier, J.: Science and medicine on YouTube. In: Hunsinger, J., Allen, M.M., Klastrup, L. (eds.) Second International Handbook of Internet Research, pp. 7–27. Springer, Dordrecht (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_1
Altmetric: YouTube tracking : Altmetric (2020). https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000236682-youtube
Altmetric: Introduction to the Altmetric Explorer (2023). https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000240622-introduction-to-the-altmetric-explorer
BioMed Central: Cell Communication and Signaling \(|\) Submission guidelines (2023). https://biosignaling.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines
BioMed Central: Microbiome \(|\) Submission guidelines (2023). https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines
Bonnevie, T., et al.: Video abstracts are associated with an increase in research reports citations, views and social attention: a cross-sectional study. Scientometrics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04675-9
Clarivate: ESI Journal List (2023). https://esi.help.clarivate.com/Content/journal-list.htm
Clarivate: Web of Science Master Journal List - Collection List Downloads (2023). https://mjl.clarivate.com/collection-list-downloads
Crossref: Crossref Metadata API JSON Format (2023). https://github.com/CrossRef/rest-api-doc/blob/master/api_format.md
Crossref: Crossref REST API (2023). https://api.crossref.org/
Dove Press: Medical Research Papers Preparation & Submission Guidelines \(|\) Dove Press \(|\) Dove Press Author guidelines (2023). https://www.dovepress.com/author-guidelines
Elsevier: Video guidelines: Cell Press (2023). https://www.cell.com/video-guidelines
Google for Developers: YouTube Data API (2023). https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3
MyJoVE Corporation: JoVE Journal (2023). https://www.jove.com/journal
Research Square: Research Promotion \(|\) Research Square (2023). https://www.researchsquare.com/researchers/promotion
SciShow: Channels - SciShow (2023). https://www.scishow.com/channels/
SciShow: SciShow (2023). https://www.scishow.com/
Shaikh, A.R., Alhoori, H., Sun, M.: YouTube and science: models for research impact. Scientometrics 128(2), 933–955 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04574-5
Spicer, S.: Exploring Video Abstracts in Science Journals: An Overview and Case Study. J. Librarianship Schol. Commun. 2(22) (2014). https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1110
SpringerNature: Promote your publication \(|\) For Researchers \(|\) Springer Nature (2023). https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/publication-promotion
Sugimoto, C.R., Work, S., Larivière, V., Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 68(9), 2037–2062 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833
Zong, Q., Xie, Y., Tuo, R., Huang, J., Yang, Y.: The impact of video abstract on citation counts: evidence from a retrospective cohort study of New Journal of Physics. Scientometrics 119(3), 1715–1727 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03108-w
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP22K18147, JP21K12592, and JP23K11761. We are grateful to Altmetric.com (https://www.altmetric.com/) for providing valuable data through the researcher data access program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F. (2023). Quantitative Analysis of Scholarly References on YouTube. In: Goh, D.H., Chen, SJ., Tuarob, S. (eds) Leveraging Generative Intelligence in Digital Libraries: Towards Human-Machine Collaboration. ICADL 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14457. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8085-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8085-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8084-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8085-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)