Abstract
Amidst the Covid-19 pandemic, distance learning was employed on an unprecedented level. As the lockdown measures have eased, it has become a parallel option alongside traditional in-person learning. Nevertheless, the utilization of basic videoconferencing tools such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet comes with a multitude of constraints that extend beyond technological aspects. These limitations are intricately linked with human behavior, psychology, but also pedagogy, drastically changing the interactions that take place during learning. Telepresence robots have been widely used due to their advantages in enhancing a sense of in-person. To investigate the opportunities, the impact, and the risks associated with the usage of telepresence robots in an educational context, we conducted an experiment in a real setting, in the specific use case of a design school and a project-based class. We are interested in the experience of a classroom and the relationships between a distance student, his/her peers, and the professor/instructor. This study employed two types of robots: a Kubi robot (a semi-static tablet-based system) and a Double robot (a mobile telepresence robot). The primary objective was to ascertain the perceptions and experiences of both remote and in-person students during their interaction with these robots. The results of the study demonstrate a marked preference among students for the Double robot over the Kubi, as indicated by their feedback.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Higher education and the digital revolution: about MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Bus. Horiz. 59(4), 441–450 (2016)
Velinov, A., Koceski, S., Koceska, N.: A review of the usage of telepresence robots in education. Balkan J. Appl. Math. Inform. 4(1), 27–40 (2021)
Wernbacher, T., et al.: Trine: telepresence robots in education (2022)
Thompson, P., Chaivisit, S.: Telepresence robots in the classroom. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 50(2), 201–214 (2021)
Bell, J., Cain, W., Peterson, A., Cheng, C.: From 2D to Kubi to doubles: designs for student telepresence in synchronous hybrid classrooms. Int. J. Designs Learn. 7(3) (2016)
Fitter, N.T., Raghunath, N., Cha, E., Sanchez, C.A., Takayama, L., Matarić, M.J.: Are we there yet? Comparing remote learning technologies in the university classroom. IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett. 5(2), 2706–2713 (2020)
Schouten, A.P., Portegies, T.C., Withuis, I., Willemsen, L.M., Mazerant-Dubois, K.: Robomorphism: examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126, 106980 (2022)
Gallon, L., Angel Abénia, F.D., Negui, M.: Using a telepresence robot in an educational contex. In: 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS 2019) (2019)
John, O.P., Srivastava, S.: The Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives, pp. 102–138 (1999)
Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., Blanchard, C.: On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivat. Emot. 24, 175–213 (2000)
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 71–81 (2009)
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., Bélisle, M., St-Onge, C.: Engagement des étudiants: une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle appliquée à des modalités de cours hybrides universitaires. Mesure et évaluation en éducation 43(2), 1–34 (2020)
Kertechian, S.K.: Conscientiousness as a key to success for academic achievement among French university students enrolled in management studies. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 16(2), 154–165 (2018)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Grounded Theory in Practice. Sage (1997)
Perifanou, M., Häfner, P., Economides, A.A.: Users’ experiences and perceptions about telepresence robots in education (2022)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by InterCarnot: Bots4Education project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hei, X. et al. (2024). Evaluating Students’ Experiences in Hybrid Learning Environments: A Comparative Analysis of Kubi and Double Telepresence Robots. In: Ali, A.A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14454. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8717-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8718-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)