Abstract
Social robots are becoming more and more perceptible in public service settings. For engaging people in a natural environment a smooth social interaction as well as acceptance by the users are important issues for future successful Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). The type of verbal communication has a special significance here. In this paper we investigate the effects of spoken language varieties of a non-standard/regional language compared to standard language. More precisely we compare a human dialog with a humanoid social robot Pepper where the robot on the one hand is answering in High German and on the other hand in Low German, a regional language that is understood and partly still spoken in the northern parts of Germany. The content of what the robot says remains the same in both variants. We are interested in the effects that these two different ways of robot talk have on human interlocutors who are more or less familiar with Low German in terms of perceived warmth, competence and possible discomfort in conversation against a background of cultural identity. To measure these factors we use the Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS) on 17 participants with an age ranging from 19 to 61. Our results show that significantly higher warmth is perceived in the Low German version of the conversation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
van Pinxteren, M.M.E., Wetzels, R.W.H., Rüger, J., Pluymaekers, M., Wetzels, M.: Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing. J. Serv. Mark. 33(4), 507–518 (2019)
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114(4), 864–886 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
Stock-Homburg, R.: Denn sie wissen nicht, was sie tun - Studie der TU Darmstadt zur Robotisierung von Büro- und Dienstleistungsberufen. Transnational Study series “Robots@work4.0” (2016). http://www.tu-darmstadt.de/universitaet/aktuelles_meldungen/archiv_2/2016/2016quartal4/einzelansicht_162880.de.jsp
Winkle, K., Jackson, R., Bejarano, A., Williams, T.: On the flexibility of robot social identity performance: benefits, ethical risks and open research questions for HRI. In: Conference: Workshop on Robo-Identity: Artificial identity and multi-embodiment at HRI (2021)
Gardecki A., Podpora,, M., Beniak, R., Klin, B.: The Pepper humanoid robot in front desk application. In: Conference Paper: Progress in Applied Electrical Engineering (PAEE) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/PAEE.2018.8441069
Diana, C.: My Robot Gets Me: How Social Design Can Make New Products More Human, pp. 218–228. Havard Business Review Press, Boston (2021). ISBN 9781633694422
Andrist, S., Ziadee, M., Boukaram, H., Mutlu, B., Sakr, M.: Effects of culture on the credibility of robot speech: a comparison between English and Arabic. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2015), New York, NY, USA, pp. 157–164. Association for Computing Machinery (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696464
Foster, M.E., Stuart-Smith, J.: Social robotics meets sociolinguistics: investigating accent bias and social context in HRI. In: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2023), New York, NY, USA, pp. 156–160. Association for Computing Machinery (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580063
Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56(1), 81–103 (2000)
Nias, J., Ruffin, M.: CultureBot: a culturally relevant humanoid robotic dialogue agent. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Southeast Conference (ACM SE 2020), New York, NY, USA, pp. 280–283. Association for Computing Machinery (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3374135.3385306
Obremski, D., Friedrich, P., Haak, N., Schaper, P., Lugrin, B.: The impact of mixed-cultural speech on the stereotypical perception of a virtual robot. Front. Robot. AI 9, 983955 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.983955
Pazylbekov, A., Kalym, D., Otynshin, A., Sandygulova, A.: Similarity attraction for robot’s dialect in language learning using social robots. In: 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea (South), pp. 532–533 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673232
Lugrin, B., Ströle, E., Obremski, D., Schwab, F., Lange, B.: What if it speaks like it was from the village? Effects of a Robot speaking in Regional Language Variations on Users Evaluations. In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Naples, Italy, pp. 1315–1320 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223432
Aldebaran, United Robotics Group and Softbank Robotics (2022). Pepper [Online]. http://www.aldebaran.com/en/pepper
Fink, J.: Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In: Ge, S.S., Khatib, O., Cabibihan, J.-J., Simmons, R., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7621, pp. 199–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_20
Carpinella, C.M., Wyman, A.B., Perez, M.A., Stroessne, S.J.: The robotic social attributes scale (RoSAS): development and validation. In: 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Vienna, Austria, pp. 254–262 (2017)
Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 71–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sievers, T., Russwinkel, N. (2024). Talking Like One of Us: Effects of Using Regional Language in a Humanoid Social Robot. In: Ali, A.A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14454. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8717-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8718-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)