Skip to main content

Long-Term Interactive Driving Simulation: MPC to the Rescue

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence (CICAI 2023)

Abstract

Simulation now plays an important role in the development of autonomous driving algorithms as it can significantly reduce the economical cost and ethical risk of real-world testing. However, building a high-quality driving simulator is not trivial as it calls for realistic interactive behaviors of road agents. Recently, several simulators employ interactive trajectory prediction models learnt in a data-driven manner. While they are successful in generating short-term interactive scenarios, the simulator quickly breaks down when the time horizon gets longer. We identify the reason behind: existing interactive trajectory predictors suffer from the out-of-domain (OOD) problem when recursively feeding predictions as the input back to the model. To this end, we propose to introduce a tailored model predictive control (MPC) module as a rescue into the state-of-the art interactive trajectory prediction model M2I, forming a new simulator named M\(^2\)Sim. Notably, M\(^2\)Sim can effectively address the OOD problem of long-term simulation by enforcing a flexible regularization that admits the replayed data, while still enjoying the diversity of data-driven predictions. We demonstrate the superiority of M\(^2\)Sim using both quantitative results and visualizations and release our data, code and models: https://github.com/0nhc/m2sim.

Sponsored by Baidu Inc. through Apollo-AIR Joint Research Center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tian, B., Liu, M., Gao, H.-A., Li, P., Zhao, H., Zhou, G.: Unsupervised road anomaly detection with language anchors. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 7778–7785. IEEE (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li, P., et al.: LODE: locally conditioned Eikonal implicit scene completion from sparse LiDAR. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14052 (2023)

  3. Jin, B., et al.: ADAPT: action-aware driving caption transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00673 (2023)

  4. Zheng, Y., et al.: Steps: joint self-supervised nighttime image enhancement and depth estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01334 (2023)

  5. Hu, Y., et al.: Planning-oriented autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 17 853–17 862 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ngiam, J., et al.: Scene transformer: a unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, Q., Huang, X., Gu, J., Williams, B.C., Zhao, H.: M2I: from factored marginal trajectory prediction to interactive prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6543–6552 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, X., Wang, Y., Jiang, K., Zhou, Z., Nam, K., Yin, C.: Interactive trajectory prediction using a driving risk map-integrated deep learning method for surrounding vehicles on highways. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23(10), 19 076–19 087 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, K., Zhao, L., Dong, C., Wu, L., Zheng, L.: AI-TP: attention-based interaction-aware trajectory prediction for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shen, Z.: Towards out-of-distribution generalization: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.13624 (2021)

  11. Filos, A., Tigkas, P., McAllister, R., Rhinehart, N., Levine, S., Gal, Y.: Can autonomous vehicles identify, recover from, and adapt to distribution shifts? In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3145–3153. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kerrigan, E.C.: Predictive control for linear and hybrid systems [bookshelf]. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 38(2), 94–96 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Falcone, P., et al.: Nonlinear model predictive control for autonomous vehicles (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carvalho, A., Gao, Y., Gray, A., Tseng, H.E., Borrelli, F.: Predictive control of an autonomous ground vehicle using an iterative linearization approach. In: 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), pp. 2335–2340. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gao, Y., Lin, T., Borrelli, F., Tseng, E., Hrovat, D.: Predictive control of autonomous ground vehicles with obstacle avoidance on slippery roads. In: Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, vol. 44175, pp. 265–272 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beal, C.E., Gerdes, J.C.: Model predictive control for vehicle stabilization at the limits of handling. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 21(4), 1258–1269 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levinson, J., et al.: Towards fully autonomous driving: systems and algorithms. In: 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 163–168. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mohamed, A., Qian, K., Elhoseiny, M., Claudel, C.: Social-STGCNN: a social spatio-temporal graph convolutional neural network for human trajectory prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14 424–14 432 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Casas, S., Gulino, C., Suo, S., Luo, K., Liao, R., Urtasun, R.: Implicit latent variable model for scene-consistent motion forecasting. In: Vedaldi, A., Bischof, H., Brox, T., Frahm, J.-M. (eds.) ECCV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12368, pp. 624–641. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58592-1_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamra, N., Zhu, H., Trivedi, D.K., Zhang, M., Liu, Y.: Multi-agent trajectory prediction with fuzzy query attention. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 22 530–22 541 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nayakanti, N., Al-Rfou, R., Zhou, A., Goel, K., Refaat, K.S., Sapp, B.: Wayformer: motion forecasting via simple & efficient attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05844 (2022)

  22. Lopez, P.A.: Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 2575–2582. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, H.: CityFlow: a multi-agent reinforcement learning environment for large scale city traffic scenario. In: The World Wide Web Conference, pp. 3620–3624 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Althoff, M., Koschi, M., Manzinger, S.: CommonRoad: composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads. In: 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 719–726. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Suo, S., Regalado, S., Casas, S., Urtasun, R.: TrafficSim: learning to simulate realistic multi-agent behaviors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10 400–10 409 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bergamini, L., et al.: SimNet: learning reactive self-driving simulations from real-world observations. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5119–5125. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sun, Q., Huang, X., Williams, B.C., Zhao, H.: InterSim: interactive traffic simulation via explicit relation modeling. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 11 416–11 423. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou, J.: Exploring imitation learning for autonomous driving with feedback synthesizer and differentiable rasterization. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1450–1457. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kong, J., Pfeiffer, M., Schildbach, G., Borrelli, F.: Kinematic and dynamic vehicle models for autonomous driving control design. In: 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1094–1099. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cho, M., Lee, Y., Kim, K.-S.: Model predictive control of autonomous vehicles with integrated barriers using occupancy grid maps. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kühner, T., Kümmerle, J.: Large-scale volumetric scene reconstruction using LiDAR. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 6261–6267. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Han, Z. et al. (2024). Long-Term Interactive Driving Simulation: MPC to the Rescue. In: Fang, L., Pei, J., Zhai, G., Wang, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence. CICAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14474. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9119-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9119-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9118-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9119-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics