Skip to main content

Applying Utility Functions to Adaptation Planning for Home Automation Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development

Abstract

A pervasive computing environment typically comprises multiple embedded devices that may interact together and with mobile users. These users are part of the environment, and they experience it through a variety of devices embedded in the environment. This perception involves technologies which may be heterogeneous, pervasive, and dynamic. Due to the highly dynamic properties of such environments, the software systems running on them have to face problems such as user mobility, service failures, or resource and goal changes which may happen in an unpredictable manner. To cope with these problems, such systems must be autonomous and self-managed. In this chapter we deal with a special kind of a ubiquitous environment, a smart home environment, and introduce a user-preference-based model for adaptation planning. The model, which dynamically forms a set of configuration plans for resources, reasons automatically and autonomously, based on utility functions, on which plan is likely to best achieve the user's goals with respect to resource availability and user needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Wimmers, E. L. 2000. A framework for expressing and combining preferences. ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, Dallas, TX, 2000. ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alia, M., Eide, V. S. W., Paspallis, N., Eliassen, F., Hallsteinsen, S., Papadopoulos, G.A. 2007. A utility-based adaptivity model for mobile applications. 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07), Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, May 21–23, 2007, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 556–563

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bettstetter, C., Renner, C. 2000. A Comparison of Service Discovery Protocols and Implementa-tion of the Service Location Protocol. EUNICE 2000, Sixth EUNICE Open European Sum-mer School, Twente, Netherlands, September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bluetooth Special Interest Group, Bluetooth Core Specification – Version 2.1. 2007

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonjour Protocol Specification. http://developer.apple.com/networking/bonjour/specs.html

  6. Edwards, W. K. 2006. Discovery systems in ubiquitous computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 5, 2, 70–77, April 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. European IST-FP6 project MADAM (Mobility And aDaptation enabling Middleware) http://www.ist-madam.org

  8. European IST-FP6 project MUSIC (Self-adapting applications for Mobile Users In ubiquitous Computing environments) http://www.ist-music.eu

  9. Floch, J., Hallsteinsen, S., Stav, E., Eliassen, F., Lund, K., Gjorven, E. 2006. Using architecture models for runtime adaptability. IEEE Software 23, 2, 62–70, March 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guttman, E., Perkins, C., Veizades, J., and Day, M. 1999. Service Location Protocol, Version 2. RFC. RFC Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hafenrichter, B., Kießling, W. 2005. Optimization of relational preference queries. 16th Austral-asian Database Conference – Volume 39 (Newcastle, Australia). H. E. Williams and G. Dobbie, Eds. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 103. Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, Australia, 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henricksen, K., Indulska, J., Rakotonirainy, A. 2006. Using context and preferences to implement self-adapting pervasive computing applications. Journal of Software Practice and Experience, Special Issue on Experiences with Auto-Adaptive and Reconfigurable Systems, 36(11–12), 1307–1330. Wiley, New York, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kephart, J., Chess, D. M. 2003. The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Computer Magazine 36, 1, 41–50, January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Labrinidis, A.., Stefanidis, A. 2005. Panel on mobility in sensor networks. 6th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM’05), pp. 333–334. Ayia Napa, Cyprus, May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rouvoy, R., Eliassen, F., Floch, J., Hallsteinsen, S., Stav, E. 2008. Composing components and services using a planning-based adaptation middleware. 7th International Symposium on Software Composition (SC′08). pp. 52–67 of LNCS 4954 (Springer). Budapest, Hungary. March 29–30, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sousa, J. P. and Garlan, D. 2002. Aura: An architectural framework for user mobility in ubiquitous computing environments. IFIP 17th World Computer Congress – Tc2 Stream/3rd IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture: System Design, Development and Maintenance (August 25–30, 2002). J. Bosch, W. M. Gentleman, C. Hofmeister, and J. Kuusela, Eds. IFIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 224. Kluwer B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sousa, J. P., Poladian, V., Garlan, D., Schmerl, B., Shaw, M. 2006. Task-based adaptation for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, Special Issue on Engineering Autonomic Systems 36(3), May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. UPnP Forum 2007. Universal Plug and Play. http://www.upnp.org

  19. Waldo, J. 2000 The Jini specifications. 2nd Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Z., Garlan, D. Task-driven computing. Technical Report CMU-CS-00-154 School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/2000/CMU-CS-00-154.pdf

  21. Zachariadis, S., Mascolo, C., Emmerich, W. 2002. Exploiting logical mobility in mobile computing middleware. 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems – Workshops (ICDCS 2002 Workshops). July 2002, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of this chapter would like to thank their partners in the IST-MUSIC project and acknowledge the partial financial support given to this research by the European Union (6th Framework Programme, IST 035166).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pyrros Bratskas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bratskas, P., Paspallis, N., Kakousis, K., Papadopoulos, G.A. (2009). Applying Utility Functions to Adaptation Planning for Home Automation Applications. In: Papadopoulos, G., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Wrycza, S., Zupancic, J. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-84809-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-84810-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics