Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational Learning Literature Visited – Fresh Lenses to Study Practices in ISD Organizations?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development

  • 1632 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents results of a study, in which the literature related to organizational learning (OL) and learning organization (LO) also in disciplines outside information systems (IS) was studied. The results of the literature review were classified based on the proposed framework. Based on the framework, organizations tend to learn from direct experience, from the experience of others, or by developing conceptual frameworks or paradigms for interpreting that experience. This chapter also represents some expressions from empirical data related to the subjects. The results suggest that studies made in other disciplines might provide the IS community some fresh lenses and insights to study OL and LO. The results also suggest that there exists a difference between canonical practices and non-canonical practices in the ISD organizations studied. Implications of these differences and the need for more empirical research related to the OL and LO are also discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler, P. and Cole, R. (1993). Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan management review, Spring 1993, Vol. 34, No.3., pp. 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming Organizational Defences – Facilitating Organizational Learning. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argyris, C. (1992). On Organizational Learning. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for Action – A Guide to Overcoming barriers to Organizational Change. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1996). Organizational Learning II – Theory, Method and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice; toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, February 1991, Vol. 2, No. 1., pp. 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, J., Lee, T., Zhang, R. and Zhang Y. (2003) System requirements for organizational learning. Communications of the ACM, December 2003, Vol. 46, No. 12., pp. 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiva, R. and Alegre, J. (2005). Organizational learning and organizational knowledge: towards the integration of two approaches. Management Learning, March 2005, Vol. 36, No. 1., pp. 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cyert, R. M. and March J. G. (1963) Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denzin, N. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) (2003). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dierkes, M., Antal, A., Child, J. and Nonaka, I. (eds.) (2001). Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dutton, J. M. and Thomas, A. (1984). Treating progress functions as managerial opportunity. Academic Management Review, Vol. 9, pp. 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Easterby-Smith, M., Antonacopoulou, E., Simm, D. and Lyles, M. (2004). Constructing contributions to Organizational Learning. Management Learning, Dec 2004, Vol. 35, No. 4., pp. 317–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Easterby-Smith, M. and Araujo, L. (1999) Organizational learning: Current debates and opportunities In: Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J. and Araujo, L. (eds.) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edmondson (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A Group-level Perspective. Organization Science, March/April 2002, Vol. 13, No. 2., pp. 128–146.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elkjaer, B. (1999). In Search of Social Learning Theory. In: Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J. and Araujo, L. (eds) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hargadon, A. and Bechky, B. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organizational Science, July/August 2006, Vol. 17, No. 4., pp. 484–500.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huber, G. P. Organizational learning: the Contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, February 1991, Vol. 2., No. 1., pp. 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kolb, D. (1984). Experimental Learning. Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Levitt, B. and March, J. (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 14, pp. 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyytinen K. and Robey, D. (1999). Learning failure in information systems development. Information Systems Journal, April 1999, Vol. 9, No. 2., pp. 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lyytinen, K and Rose, G. M (2006). Information system development agility as organizational learning.European Journal of Information Systems, April 2006, Vol. 15, No 2., pp. 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newell, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L. Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2006). Sharing knowledge across projects: Limits to ICT-led project review practices. Management Learning, June 2006, Vol 37, No 2., pp. 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Orr, J. (1987). Narratives at Work: Story Telling as Cooperative Diagnostic Activity. Field Service Manager, pp. 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schein, E. (1993). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the Green Room. Sloan Management Review, Winter 1993, Vol. 34, No.2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline – The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stein, E, and Vandenbosch, B (1996). Organizational learning during advanced system development: Opportunities and obstacles. Journal on Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2., pp. 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Strauss, A. L. and J. Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Applications. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tosey, P. (2005). The hunting of the learning organisation: A paradoxical journey. Management Learning, September 2005, Vol. 36, No 3., pp. 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vera, D. and Crossnan, N. (2003). Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. In M. A. Lyles and M. Easterby-Smith (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, pp. 122–142., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wastell, D. (1999). Learning dysfunctions in information systems development: overcoming the social defenses with transitional objects. Management Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 4., pp. 581–600.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South Karelia University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Pasi Juvonen & Päivi Ovaska

Authors
  1. Pasi Juvonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Päivi Ovaska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Computer Science, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

    George Angelos Papadopoulos

  2. College of Business & Economics, Dept. Information Technology &, Boise State University, Univesity Dr. 1910, Boise, 83725-1615, Idaho, USA

    Wita Wojtkowski

  3. College of Business & Economics, Dept. Information Technology &, Boise State University, Univesity Dr. 1910, Boise, 83725-1615, Idaho, USA

    Gregory Wojtkowski

  4. Dep. of Information Systems, University of Gdansk, 81-824 Sopot,Polska ul. Armii, Krajowej, 119121, Poland

    Stanislaw Wrycza

  5. University of Maribor, Presernova 11, Kranj, 4000, Slovenia

    Jože Zupancic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Juvonen, P., Ovaska, P. (2009). Organizational Learning Literature Visited – Fresh Lenses to Study Practices in ISD Organizations?. In: Papadopoulos, G., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Wrycza, S., Zupancic, J. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-84809-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-84810-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation