Skip to main content
Log in

JETA: A knowledge-based approach to aircraft gas turbine engine maintenance

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aircraft gas turbine engine maintenance is a complex task requiring not only specialized technical skill but effective integration of many sources of information. Traditionally, military maintenance technicians make extensive use of common sense knowledge, equipment manuals, pilot reports, instrument readings, engine settings and physical observations. Reasoning based upon patterns in sensor data, case histories and past maintenance is infrequently carried out. Difficulties in maintenance arise from the need to quickly restore the engines to an operational state, the frequent reassignment of technicians and the awkward access to, and interpretation of, data. There is a need to overcome these factors.

This paper describes a knowledge-based diagnostic system for military gas turbine aero-engines. The objectives were to develop a system which encodes the heuristics of technicians and to provide an expandable framework for automating the technical manuals and incorporating explanations, data interpretation, as well as case history and model-based reasoning. The eventual goal is to apply the system to the maintenance of complex mechanical equipment and have it reason, in an on-line mode, with data obtained from a data acquisition system.

A description of the application area and the features of the system, in its current stage of development, are discussed. This paper will be of practical benefit to those developing knowledge-based maintenance systems for complex mechanical equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.L. Davidson, M. Halasz, S. Phan and S. Abu-Hakima, “Intelligent troubleshooting of complex machinery,” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Charleston, SC, 1990.

  2. C. Schofield, R. La Grandeur, F. Dubé, T. Harris, R. Cue and A. LeBlanc, “Canadian forces aircraft engine condition/health monitoring—policy, plans and experience,” Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) Proceedings No. 448, Québec City, Canada, pp. 4–1, 10, 1988.

  3. S.D.S.R. Karamchetty, “HARVEST—An expert system,” Proceedings of the 1985 ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, Boston, MA, pp. 243–248, 1985.

  4. L. Friedman, “FAITH: A diagnostic shell,” Proceedings of the Third Annual Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computer Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA, pp. 563–572, 1987.

  5. R. Patil and O. Senyk, “Efficient structuring of composite causal hypotheses in medical diagnosis,” Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, pp. 23–29, 1987.

  6. O. Senyk, “The integration of compiled and explicit causal knowledge for diagnostic reasoning,” Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, pp. 106–109, 1988.

  7. W.J. Clancey, “Heuristic classification,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 289–350, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.J. Kalme, “A rule-based architecture for diagnosis,” Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computer Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA, pp. 524–535, 1987.

  9. C.R. Saxon, “AI-based diagnostic reasoning: An overview of what, how and why,” Proceedings of the Third Annual Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computer Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA, pp. 511–523, 1987.

  10. R.M. Turner, “Using schemata for diagnosis,” Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, pp. 84–89, 1988.

  11. G. Biswas and T.S. Anand, “MIDST: An expert system shell for mixed initiative reasoning,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Charlotte, NC, pp. 1–8, 1987.

  12. R. Fikes and T. Kehler, “The role of frame-based representation in reasoning,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, no. 9, 1985.

  13. T.G. Jellison and R.L. De Hoff, “Knowledge based jet engine diagnostics,” Proceedings of the First Annual Workshop on Space Operations, Automation and Robotics (SOAR 87), Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.R. LaPierre, P.A. Costen, D.L. Doel and R.P. Shah, “INTERFACE II—Advanced diagnostic software,” Report No. AFWAL-TR-88-2096, Prepared for Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Final Report for Period July 1985–July 1988.

  15. K. Collinge and K. Schoff, “TEXMAS—An expert system for gas turbine diagnosis and more,” SAE 871737, 1987.

  16. W.H. Chu, “Generic expert system shell for diagnostic reasoning,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, IEA/AIE-88, TN, 1988.

  17. Carnegie Group Inc., “TestBench Technical Description,” 5 PPG Place, Pittsburgh, PA, 15222.

  18. P.P. Bonissone and H.E. Johnson, Jr., “DELTA: An expert system for diesel electric locomotive repair,” Proceedings of the Joint Services Workshop, AI in Maintenance, Boulder, CO, pp. 391–405, 1983.

  19. P.K. Fink and J.C. Lusth, “Expert systems and diagnostic expertise in the mechanical domains,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-17, no. 3, pp. 340–349, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Cantone, “Diagnostic reasoning with IN-ATE,” Proceedings of the Third Annual Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computer Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA, pp. 583–588, 1987.

  21. T.P. Gall, C.R. Marling, D.A. Moyer, C.K. Wu and K.J. Daniel, “Hypertext/expert system for machine diagnostics and mechanic training,” Proceedings of the 1988 ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, CA, pp. 325–330, 1988.

  22. G. Karel and M. Kenner, “KLUE: A diagnostic expert system tool for manufacturing,” Proceedings of the 1988 ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, pp. 331–336, 1988.

  23. D.L. Doel, “The role for expert systems in commercial gas turbine engine monitoring,” Proceedings of the ASME Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Brussels, Belgium, 1990.

  24. D. Kibler, D.W. Aha, M.K. Albert, “Instance-based prediction of real-valued attributes,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 5, pp. 51–57, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. de Kleer, B.C. Williams, “Diagnosing multiple faults,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32, pp. 97–130, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Hamscher, “XDE: diagnosing devices with hierrachic structure and known component failure modes,” Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 48–54, 1990.

  27. D.W. Simmons, T.P. Hamilton and R.G. Carlson, “Helix: A causal model-based diagnostic expert system,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Abu-Hakima, M. Halasz, S. Phan, K. Kornelson, “A graphical knowledge browser for the jet engine troubleshooting assistant (JETA),” Proceedings of the Third Symposium/Workshop on Engineering Applications of Expert Systems in DND, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, pp. 58–72, 1991.

  29. L. Chesler, J. Geissman, R. Koster, I. Stobie, “EXFAULT: A generalized expert fault diagnosis system,” Proceedings of the Third Annual Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computer Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA, pp. 573–582, 1987.

  30. S. Abu-Hakima, F. Oppacher, “Improving explanations in knowledge-based systems: RATIONALE,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 2, pp. 301–343, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P.J. Hayes and D.R. Reddy, “Steps towards graceful interaction in spoken and written man-machine communication,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 19, No. 3, 231–284, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  32. P.J. Hayes and I.D. Glasner, “Automatic construction of explanation networks for a cooperative user interface,” SIGSOC Bulletin (USA), vol. 13, no. 2–3, pp. 6–14, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halasz, M., Davidson, P., Abu-Hakima, S. et al. JETA: A knowledge-based approach to aircraft gas turbine engine maintenance. Appl Intell 2, 25–46 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058574

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058574

Key words

Navigation