Skip to main content
Log in

The indecomposability problem in binary morphology: An algorithmic approach

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An indecomposable shape is like a prime number. It cannot be decomposed further as a Minkowski sum of two simpler shapes. With respect to Minkowski addition (dilation), therefore, the indecomposable shapes are the fundamental building blocks of all geometric shapes. However, just as it is difficult to identify whether a given number is a prime number or not, it is equally or more difficult to say whether a given shape is indecomposable or not. In this paper we take up a subdomain of binary images, called the weakly taxicab convex image domain, and show how the indecomposability problem in that shape domain can be approached in a manner closely analogous to the number theoretic way. Apart from our attempt to show that the indecomposability problem is an extremely interesting mathematical problem, our algorithmic treatment of the problem also leads to an efficient method of computing Minkowski addition and decomposition of binary images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Danzer, B. Grunbaum, and V. Klee, “Helly's theorem and its relatives,” Convexity—Proceedings of the Symposium in Pure Mathematics, Am. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, 1963, Vol. VII, pp. 101–180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.K. Ghosh, “An algebra of polygons through the notion of negative shapes,” CVGIP: Image Understanding, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 119–144, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.K. Ghosh and R.M. Haralick, Indecomposability Problem in Mathematical Morphology, SPIE Proceedings on Vision Geometry, 1992, Vol. 1832, pp. 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.K. Ghosh and R.M. Haralick, “Mathematical morphological operations of boundary-represented geometric objects,” Journal of mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 6, Nos. 2/3, 1996.

  5. R.M. Haralick, S.R. Sternberg, and X. Zhuang, “Image analysis using mathematical morphology,” IEEE Trans, on PAMI, Vol. PAMI-9, No. 4, pp. 532–550, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henk J.A.M. Heijman, Morphological Image Operators, Academic Press, 1994.

  7. K. Iwano and K. Steiglitz, “Testing for cycles in infinite graphs with periodic structure,” in Proc. of ACM Sympos. on Theory of Computing, 1987, pp. 46–55.

  8. M. Kallay, “Indecomposable polytopes,” Israel. J. Math., Vol. 41, pp. 235–243, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kallay, “Decomposability of polytopes is a projective invariant,” Annals of Discrete Math., Vol. 20, pp. 191–196, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Kanungo and R.M. Haralick, “Vector-space solution for a morphological shape-decomposition problem,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 2, pp. 51–82, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.E. Kim and A. Rosenfeld, “Digital straight lines and convexity of digital regions,” IEEE Trans. on PAMI, Vol. PAMI-4, No. 2, pp. 149–153, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.F. Krause, Taxicab Geometry, Dover Publications, 1986.

  13. P. McMullen, “Representations of polytopes and polyhedral sets,” Geom. Dedicata, Vol. 2, pp. 83–94, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Meyer, “Indecomposable polytopes,” Trans. of the American Math. Society, Vol. 190, pp. 77–86, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.A. Melter, “A survey of digital metrics,” Contemporary Mathematics, Am. Math. Soc., Vol. 119, pp. 95–106, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.S. Millman and G.D. Parker, Geometry: A Metric Approach with Models, Springer-Verlag, 1982.

  17. D. Mount and R. Silverman, “Combinatorial and computational aspects of Minkowski decompositions,” Contemporary Mathematics, Am. Math. Soc., Vol. 119, pp. 108–124, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F.P. Preparata and M.I. Shamos, Computational Geometry: An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, 1985.

  19. J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Academic Press, 1982.

  20. G.C. Shephard, “Decomposable convex polyhedra,” Mathematika, Vol. 10, pp. 89–95, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Z. Smilansky, “Decomposability of polytopes and polyhedra,” Geom. Dedicata, Vol. 24, pp. 29–49, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Xu, “Decomposition of convex polygonal morphological structuring elements into neighborhood subsets,” IEEE Trans. on PAMI, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 153–161, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghosh, P.K. The indecomposability problem in binary morphology: An algorithmic approach. J Math Imaging Vis 6, 169–198 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119838

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119838

Keywords

Navigation