Skip to main content
Log in

A new procedure for improving the predictiveness of CoMFA models and its application to a set of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A new automated procedure to improve the predictive quality of CoMFA models for both training and test sets is described. A model of greater consistency is generated by performing small reorientations of the underlying molecules for which too low activities are calculated. In order to predict activities of test compounds, the most similar molecules in the previously optimized model are identified and used as a basis for the prediction. This method has been applied to two independent sets of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors (80 compounds each, serving as training sets), resulting in a significant increase of the cross-validated r2 value. For both models, the predictive r2 value for a test set consisting of 70 compounds was improved substantially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cramer, III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.E., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avery, M.A., Gao, F. and Chong, W.K.M., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 4264.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horwitz, J.P., Massova, I., Wiese, T.E., Besler, P.H. and Corbett, T.H., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 781.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waller, C.L., Oprea, T.I., Giolitti, A. and Marshall, G.R., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 4152.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Waller, C.L. and Marshall, G.R., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 2390.

    Google Scholar 

  6. DePriest, S.A., Mayer, D., Naylor, C.B. and Marshall, G.R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115 (1993) 5372.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Debnath, A.K., Hansch, C., Kim, K.H. and Martin, Y.C., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 1007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H. and Dunn, III, W.J., SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 5 (1984) 735.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wold, S., Albano, C., Dunn, III, W.J., Edlund, U., Esbenson, K., Geladi, P., Hellberg, S., Johannson, E., Lindberg, W. and Sjörström, M., In Kowalski, B. (Ed.) Chemometrics: Mathematics and Statistics in Chemistry, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 17–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stahle, L. and Wold, S., Prog. Med. Chem., 25 (1988) 292.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cramer, III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relatsh., 7 (1988) 18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thibaut, U., Folkers, G., Klebe, G., Kubinyi, H., Merz, A. and Rognan, D., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relatsh., 13 (1994) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicklaus, M.C., George, W.A. and Terrence, Jr., R.B., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 6 (1992) 487.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Silipo, C. and Hansch, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97 (1975) 6849.

    Google Scholar 

  15. SYBYL Molecular Modelling Package, v. 6.04, TRIPOS Associates, Inc., St. Louis, MO, 1993.

  16. Vinter, J.G., Davies, A. and Saunder, M.R., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 1 (1987) 31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Powell, M.J.D., Math. Program., 12 (1977) 241.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart, J.J.P. and Seiler, F.J., MOPAC (v. 5.00), QCPE Program No. 455, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange, University of Indiana, Bloomington, IN, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dewar, M.J.S. and Thiel, W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99 (1977) 4899.

    Google Scholar 

  20. SYBYL Molecular Modelling Software version 6.0 Command Manual, Tripos Associates, Inc., St. Louis, MO, 1992, p. 1259.

  21. SYBYL Molecular Modelling Software version 6.0 Theory Manual, Tripos Associates, Inc., St. Louis, MO, 1992, p. 2225.

  22. Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., Comput. J., 7 (1965) 308.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. and Vetterling, W.T., Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987, pp. 289–293.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson, M., Lajiness, M. and Maggiora, G., Prog. Clin. Biol. Res., 291 (1989) 167.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, K.H., Greco, G., Novellino, E., Silipo, C. and Vittoria, A., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 263.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, M. and Cramer, III, R.D., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relatsh., 12 (1993) 137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kroemer, R.T., Hecht, P. A new procedure for improving the predictiveness of CoMFA models and its application to a set of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 9, 396–406 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123997

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123997

Keywords

Navigation