Skip to main content
Log in

Use of the hydrogen bond potential function in a comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) on a set of benzodiazepines

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The results of the GRID-Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) were compared with those of the SYBYL-CoMFA in a study of benzodiazepines. The results demonstrate that the hydrogen bonding function using the GRID H2O probe in a CoMFA can successfully describe the hydrophobic effects of substituents without any bias or preconcept of their effects in the development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. Martin, Y.C., In Quantitative Drug Design: A Critical Introduction (Medicinal Research Series, Vol. 8), Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ståhle, L. and Wold, S., Proc. Med. Chem., 25 (1988) 292.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindberg, W., Persson, J.-A. and Wold, S., Anal. Chem., 55 (1983) 643.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoskuldsson, A., J. Chemometrics, 2 (1987) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer III, R.D., Bunce, J.D., Patterson, D.E. and Frank, I.E., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 7 (1988) 18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wold, S., Technometrics, 20 (1978) 397.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen, M.S., Tan, Y., Trudell, M.I., Narayanan, K., Schindler, I.R., Martin, M.J., Schultz, C., Hagen, T.J., Koehler, K.F., Codding, P.W., Skonick, P. and Cook, J.M., J. Med. Chem., 33 (1990) 2343.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bjorkroth, J.-P., Pakkanen, T.A., Lindroos, J., Pohjala, E., Hanjijarvi, H., Lauren, L., Hannuniemi, R., Juhakoshi, A., Kippo, K. and Kleimola, T., J. Med. Chem., 34 (1991) 2338.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll, F.I., Gao, Y., Rahman, A., Abraham, P., Parham, K., Lewin, A.H., Boja, J.W. and Kuhar, M.J., J. Med. Chem., 34 (1991) 2719.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greco, G., Novellino, E., Silipo, C. and Vittoria, A., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relatsh., 10 (1991) 289.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greco, G., Novellino, E., Silipo, C. and Vittoria, A., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relatsh., 11 (1992) 461.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, M., Cramer III, R.D., Lones, D.M., Patterson, D.E. and Simeroth, P.E., Tetrahedro Comp. Method., 3 (1990) 47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, K.H. and Martin, Y.C., J. Org. Chem., 56 (1991) 2723.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, K.H. and Martin, Y.C., J. Med. Chem., 34 (1991) 2056.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, K.H., In Wermuth, C.G. (Ed.) Trends in QSAR and Molecular Modelling '92, ESCOM Leiden, 1993, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, K.H., Med. Chem. Res., 1 (1991) 259.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goodford, P.J., J. Med. Chem., 28 (1985) 849.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boobbyer, D.N.A., Goodford, P.J., McWhinnie, P.M. and Wade, R.C., J. Med. Chem., 32 (1989) 1083.

    Google Scholar 

  20. GRID Program, V7, Molecular Discovery Ltd., West Way House, Elms Parade, Oxford, U.K.

  21. SYBYL Molecular Modelling System (Version 5.30), TRIPOS Assoc., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.

  22. Hansch, C. and Leo, A., In Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology, Wiley, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy, E.F. and Stewart, J.J.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107 (1985) 3902.

    Google Scholar 

  24. MOPAC (Version 5.00), Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange, No. 455, 1989.

  25. The terms GRID-CoMFA and SYBYL-CoMFA are used throughout this paper in order to distinguish the different force fields (GRIDS and SYBYL force fields, respectively) used in the CoMFA study. The term QSAR-CoMFA refers to the study where both the traditional QSAR and CoMFA methodologies are employed in order to investigate structure-activity relationships of a set of compounds.

  26. Haefely, W., Kyburz, E., Gerecke, M. and Moheler, H., In Testa, B. (Ed.) Advances in Dru Researches, Vol. 14, Academic Press, London, 1985, pp. 156–322.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The originally reported standard error of the calibration was transformed into the root mean square of estimation calculated as described in the Methods section and reported in parentheses in order to compare the results.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.H., Greco, G., Novellino, E. et al. Use of the hydrogen bond potential function in a comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) on a set of benzodiazepines. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 7, 263–280 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125502

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125502

Key words

Navigation