Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating docked complexes with the HINT exponential function and empirical atomic hydrophobicities

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Methods that predict geometries of ligands binding to receptor molecules can facilitate ligand discovery and yield information on the factors governing complementarity. Here, the use of atomic hydrophobicities in evaluating binding modes has been examined with four ligand-receptor complexes of known structure. In each system, hundreds of hypothetical binding orientations were generated with DOCK and evaluated using the HINT (Hydropathic INTeractions) exponential function and atomic hydrophobic constants. In three of the four systems, the experimental binding mode received the best HINT score; in the fourth system, the experimental binding mode scored only slightly lower than a similar, apparently reasonable orientation. The HINT function may be generally useful as a scoring method in molecular docking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shoichet, B.K., Bodian, D.L. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 380.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meng, E.C., Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 505.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meng, E.C., Gschwend, D.A., Blaney, J.M. and Kuntz, I.D., Proteins, 17 (1993) 266.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wireko, F.C., Kellogg, G.E. and Abraham, D.J., J. Med. Chem., 34 (1991) 758.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kellogg, G.E., Joshi, G.S. and Abraham, D.J., Med. Chem. Res., 1 (1992) 444.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansch, C. and Leo, A., Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology, Wiley, New York, NY, 1979, pp. 1–339.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J.B., MeyerJr., E.F., Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T. and Tasumi, M., J. Mol. Biol., 112 (1977) 535.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrin, T.E., Huang, C.C., Jarvis, L.E. and Langridge, R., J. Mol. Graphics, 6 (1988) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rees, D.C. and Lipscomb, W.N., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80 (1983) 7151.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bolin, J.T., Filman, D.J., Matthews, D.A., Hamlin, R.C. and Kraut, J., J. Biol. Chem., 257 (1982) 13650.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vyas, N.K., Vyas, M.N. and Quiocho, F.A., Science, 242 (1988) 1290.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borah, B., Chen, C.-W., Egan, W., Miller, M., Wlodawer, A. and Cohen, J.S., Biochemistry, 24 (1985) 2058.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly, M.L., Science, 221 (1983) 709.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meng, E.C., Kuntz, I.D., Abraham, D.J. et al. Evaluating docked complexes with the HINT exponential function and empirical atomic hydrophobicities. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 8, 299–306 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126747

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126747

Key words

Navigation