Abstract
Mathematics, as a subject dealing with abstract concepts, poses a special challenge for educators. In students' experience, the subject is often associated with (potentially) unflattering adjectives — “austere”, “remote”, “depersonalized”, and so forth. This paper describes a computer program named HyperGami whose purpose is to alleviate this harsh portrait of the mathematical enterprise. HyperGami is a system for the construction of decorated paper polyhedral. shapes; these shapes may be combined into larger polyhedral sculptures, which we have dubbed “orihedra.” In this paper, we illustrate the methods by which orihedra may be created from HyperGami solids (using the construction of a particular sculpture as an example); we describe our experiences with elementary- and middle-school students using HyperGami to create orihedra; we discuss the current limitations of HyperGami as a sculptural medium; and we outline potential directions for future research and software development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abelson, H. and diSessa, A. (1980). Turtle Geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Abelson, H. and Sussman, G. J. with Sussman, J. (1985). Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Banchoff, T. (1990). Dimension. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the Shoulders of Giants (pp. 11–59). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
BioCrystal, Inc. Zometool. Boulder, CO.
Brinkmann, E. (1966). Programed instruction as a technique for improving spatial visualization. Journal of Applied Psychology 50(2): 179–184.
Coxeter, H. S. M. (1973). Regular Polytopes. New York: Dover.
Croft, H., Falconer, K. and Guy, R. (1991). Unsolved Problems in Geometry. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cundy, H. M. and Rollett, A. P. (1951). Mathematical Models. London: Oxford University Press.
Eisenberg, M. (1991). Programmable applications: Interpreter meets interface. MIT AI Lab Memo 1325. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Eisenberg, M. (1996). The thin glass line: Designing interfaces to algorithms. Proceedings of CHI '96, Vancouver, BC, pp. 181–188.
Eisenberg, M. and DiBiase, J. (1996). Mathematical manipulatives as designed artifacts: The cognitive, affective, and technological dimensions. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences, pp. 44–51.
Eisenberg, M. and Fischer, G. (1994). Programmable design environments. Proceedings of CHI'94, Boston, pp. 431–437.
Eisenberg, M. and Nishioka, A. (1997). Creating polyhedral models by computer. To appear in Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching.
Eisenberg, M. and Nishioka, A. (1994). HyperGami: A computational system for creating decorated paper constructions. To appear in Proceedings of Second International Meeting of Origami Science and Scientific Origami. Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Hayes, B. (1995). Pleasures of plication. American Scientist 83: 504–509.
Heath, Sir Thomas L. (1925). The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements. New York: Dover. (Reprinted, 1956.)
Hilbert, D. and Cohn-Vossen, S. (1952). Geometry and the Imagination. New York: Chelsea.
Hilton, P. and Pedersen, J. (1994). Build Your Own Polyhedra. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Holden, A. (1971). Shapes, Space, and Symmetry. New York: Dover.
Mitchelmore, M. (1980). Three-dimensional geometrical drawing in three cultures. Educational Studies in Mathematics 11: 205–216.
Mühlhausen, E. (1993) Riemann surface — crocheted in four colors. Mathematical Intelligencer 15(3): 49–53.
Nardi, B. (1993). A Small Matter of Programming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Papert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In I. Harel and S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Pearce, P. and Pearce, S. (1980). Experiments in Form. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1948). The Child's Conception of Space. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Resnick, M. (1993). Behavior construction kits. Communications of the ACM 36(7): 64–71.
Rudolph, J. S. (1983). Make Your Own Working Paper Clock. New York: Harper and Row.
Senechal, M. and Fleck, G. (1988). Polyhedra in the curriculum. In M. Senechal and G. Fleck (Eds.), Shaping Space: A Polyhedral Approach (pp. 262–265). Boston:Birkhäuser
Spooner, P. (1986). Spooner's Moving Animals. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
Suzuki, E. (1987). Omoshiro ku kan e no sho tai. (Unique Creativity Utilizing Polyhedra.) In Japanese. Tokyo: Teruko Nakagawa.
Trudeau, R. J. (1987). The Non-Euclidean Revolution. Boston: Birkhäuser.
Welchman-Tischler, R. (1992). The Mathematical Toolbox. White Plains, NY: Cuisenaire.
Wenninger, M. (1971). Polyhedron Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, R. (1979). The Geometrical Foundation of Natural Structure. New York: Dover.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eisenberg, M., Nishioka, A. Orihedra: Mathematical sculptures in paper. Int J Comput Math Learning 1, 225–261 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182617
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182617