Skip to main content
Log in

Controlling the dynamics of a two-joined arm by central patterning and reflex-like processing

A two-stage hybrid model

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is demonstrated, that a two-joined arm performing goal directed movements is controllable (a) by two central pattern generators (CPG) representing sampled data control, each referring to one joint, initiated for exactly one period, and producing the angular movement width about this joint, and (b) by reflex-like processes operating continuously with respect to time. The latter eliminate the effects of dynamic coupling, gravity, inertia, and mechanical impedance on the movement by ‘proprioceptive feedforward’ of position, velocity and acceleration signals, thus enabling the CPGs to handle the arm segments as if they were independent and free from forces. Higher ordered centers (with respect to the CPGs) therefore only need to control the kinematics, not dynamics, of the arm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carew ThJ (1981) Spinal Cord I: muscles and muscle receptors. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH (eds) Principles of neural science 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckmiller R (1990) Neural computers for motor control. In: Eckmiller R (ed) Advanced neural computers. Elsevier, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund HJ (1986) Time control of hand movements. In: Freund HJ, Büttner U, Cohen B, Noth J (eds) The oculomotor and skeletalmotor systems. Prog Brain Res 64:287–294.

  • Grillner S (1985) Neural control of vertebrate locomotion — central mechanisms and reflex interaction with special reference to the cat. In: Barnes WJP, Gladden NH (eds) Feedback and motor control in invertebrates and vertebrates. Groom-Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst E von, Mittelstaedt H (1950) Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenchaften 37:464–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst E von, Mittelstaedt H (1973) The reafference principle. Interaction between the central nervous system and the periphery. In: Selected papers of Erich von Holst: the behavioural physiology of animals and man, vol 1. Methuen, London (Translated from German by R. Martin), pp 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalveram K Th (1981) Erwerb sensumotorischer Koordinationen unter störenden Umwelteinflüssen: Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Erlernens von Werkzeuggebrauch (Engl. Titel: Acquiring sensorimotor coordinations under disturbed feedback. A contribution to the problem of learning to handle a tool). In: Tent L (ed) Erkennen, Wollen, Handeln. Festschrift für Heinrich Düker. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 336–348.

  • Kalveram K Th (1990) A neural network acquiring the inverse of a tool or limb transformation by “self-imitation learning”. Poster at the ICNC — 10th Cybernetic Congress of the DGK, Düsseldorf. (Reprint available on request from the author).

  • Kalveram K Th (1991) Pattern generating and reflex-like processes controlling aiming movements in the presence of inertia, damping and gravity. A theoretical note. Biol Cybern 64:413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawato M (1990) Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised motor learning. In: Eckmiller R (ed) Advanced neural computers. Elsevier, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperstein M, Rubinstein J (1989) Implementation of an adaptive neural controller for sensory-motor coordination. Control Syst 3:25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF (1986) Simulation studies on the control of posture and movement in a multi-jointed limb. Biol Cybern 54:367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin JH (1981) Somatic sensory system I: Receptor physiology and submodality coding. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH (eds) Principles of neural science, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey DI (1981) corollary discharges: Motor commands and perception. In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control, part 2. In: Handbood of physiology, Sect. 1: The nervous system, vol II. Americal Physiological Society, Bethesda, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt H (1990) Basic solutions to the problem of head-centric visual localization. In: Warren R, Wertheim AH (eds) The perception and control of self-motion. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto H, Kawato M, Setoyama T, Suzuki R (1988) Feedback-error-learning neural network for trajectory control of a robotic manipulator. Neural Networks 1:251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter HJ, Martinetz TM, Schulten KJ (1989) Topology-conserving maps for learning visuo-motor-coordination. Neural Networks 2:159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman E (1979) Levels of sensorimotor representation. J Math Psychol 20:91–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman E, Kelso JAS (1987) Skilled actions: A task-dynamic approach. Psychol Rev 94:84–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry RW (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual neural inversion. J Comp Physiol 43:482–489.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalveram, K.T. Controlling the dynamics of a two-joined arm by central patterning and reflex-like processing. Biol. Cybern. 65, 65–71 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197291

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197291

Keywords

Navigation