Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal control of antagonistic muscle stiffness during voluntary movements

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the control of antagonist muscle stiffness during single-joint arm movements by optimal control theory with a minimal effort criterion. A hierarchical model is developed based on the physiology of the neuromuscular control system and the equilibrium point hypothesis. For point-to-point movements, the model provides predictions on (1) movement trajectory, (2) equilibrium trajectory, (3) muscle control inputs, and (4) antagonist muscle stiffness, as well as other variables. We compared these model predictions to the behavior observed in normal human subjects. The optimal movements capture the major invariant characteristics of voluntary movements, such as a sigmoidal movement trajectory with a bell-shaped velocity profile, an ‘N’-shaped equilibrium trajectory, a triphasic burst pattern of muscle control inputs, and a dynamically modulated joint stiffness. The joint stiffness is found to increase in the middle of the movement as a consequence of the triphasic muscle activities. We have also investigated the effects of changes in model parameters on movement control. We found that the movement kinematics and muscle control inputs are strongly influenced by the upper bound of the descending excitation signal that activates motoneuron pools in the spinal cord. Furthermore, a class of movements with scaled velocity profiles can be achieved by tuning the amplitude and duration of this excitation signal. These model predictions agree with a wide body of experimental data obtained from normal human subjects. The results suggest that the control of fast arm movements involves explicit planning for both the equilibrium trajectory and joint stiffness, and that the minimal effort criterion best characterizes the objective of movement planning and control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkeson CG, Hollarbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DJ, Hollarbach JM, Xu Y, Hunter IW (1992) Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 88:433–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi E, Dev P, Morasso P, Polit A (1978) Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. J Neurophyisol 41:542–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi E, Hogan N, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Giszter S (1992) Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behav Brain Sci 15:603–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, AE Jr, Ho YC (1975) Applied optimal control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SC, Zahalak GI (1982) The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. J Biomech 15:111–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter RR, Crago PE, Gorman PH (1993) Nonlinear stretch reflex interaction during cocontraction. J Neurophysiol 69:943–952

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG (1986) Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (λ-model) for motor control. J Motor Behav 18:17–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Orlovsky GN (1972) The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat. Exp Neurol 37:481–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Adamovich SV, Ostry DJ, Flanagan JR (1990) The origin of electro-myograms — explanation based on the equilibrium point hypothesis, IN Winters J, Woo S (eds) Multiple muscle systems, biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New york

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders M, Herrmann U (1992) Two components of muscle activation: scaling with the speed of arm movement. J Neurophysiol 67:931–943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flash T (1987) The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multijoint arm movements. Biol Cybern 57:257–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1971) Effects of initial conditions on the Hoffman reflex. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 34:226–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC (1989) Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behav Brain Sci 12:189–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z (1986) Optimized movement trajectories and joint stiffness in unperturbed, inertially loaded movements. Biol Cybern 53:373–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer JA, Andreassen S (1981) Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. J Neurophysiol 45:267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N (1984) An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4:2745–2754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houk JC, Rymer WZ (1981) Neural control of muscle length and tension. In: Brooks VB (eds) Handbook of physiology sect 1, The nervous system vol II, part 1. American Physiological Society, Bekerda, Md, pp 257–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey DR, Reed DJ (1983) Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. In: Desmedt JE (eds) Advances in neurology vol 39. Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karst GM, Hasan Z (1987) Antagonist muscle activity during human forearm movements under varying kinematic and loading conditions. Exp Brain Res 67:391–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney RE, Hunter IW (1990) System identification of human joint dynamics. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18:55–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk DE (1970) Optimal control theory, an introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Licata F, Soechting JF (1982) The mechanical behavior of the human forearm in response to transient perturbations. Biol Cybern 44:35–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (1992) Virtual trajectories, joint stiffness, and changes in the limb natural frequency during single-joint oscillatory movements. Neuroscience 49:209–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Gottlieb GL (1991) Reconstruction of shifting elbow joint compliant characteristics during fast and slow movements. Neuroscience 43:697–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lestienne F (1979) Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements. Exp Brain Res 35:407–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD, Obeso JA, Rothwell JC (1983) The function of the antagonistic muscle during fast limb movements in man. J Physiol (Lond) 335:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1986) Observations on the automatic compensation of reflex gain on varying the pre-existing level of motor discharge in man. J Physiol (Lond) 374:73–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustard E, Lee RG (1987) Relationship between EMG patterns and kinematic properties for flexion movements at the human wrist. Exp Brain Res 66:247–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagasaki H (1989) Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements. Exp Brain Res 74:319–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols TR (1987) The regulation of muscle stiffness, implications for the control of limb stiffness. In: Hebbelinck M, Shephard RJ (eds) Medicine and sport science, Vol 26. Karger, Basel, pp 36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols TR, Houk JC (1976) Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39:119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols TR, Koffler-Smulevitz D (1991) Mechanical analysis of heterogenic inhibition between soleus muscle and the pretibial flexors in the cat. J Neurophysiol 66:1139–1155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rack PMH, Westbury DR (1969) The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J Physiol 204:443–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SM (1972) A quadratically convergent algorithm for general nonlinear programming problems. Math Program 3:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Dufresne JR, Lacquaniti F (1981) Time-varying properties of myotatic response in man during some simple motor tasks. J Neurophysiol 46:1226–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Uno Y, Kawato M, Suzuki R (1989) Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Biol Cybern 61:89–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winters JM, Stark L (1987) Muscle models: what is gained and what is lost by varying model complexity. Biol Cybern 55:403–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CH, Houk JC, Young KY Miller LE (1990) Nonlinear damping of limb motion. In: Winters J Woos (eds) Multiple muscle systems, biomechanics and movement organization, chap 13. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lan, N., Crago, P.E. Optimal control of antagonistic muscle stiffness during voluntary movements. Biol. Cybern. 71, 123–135 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197315

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197315

Keywords

Navigation