Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model of the motor unit action potential was developed to investigate the amplitude and frequency spectrum contributions of motor units, located at various depths within muscle, to the surface detected electromyographic (EMG) signal. A dipole representation of the transmembrane current in a three-dimensional muscle volume was used to estimate detected individual muscle fiber action potentials. The effects of anisotropic muscle conductance, innervation zone location, propagation velocity, fiber length, electrode area, and electrode configuration were included in the fiber action potential model. A motor unit action potential was assumed to be the sum of the individual muscle fiber action potentials. A computational procedure, based on the notion of isopotential layers, was developed which substantially reduced the calculation time required to estimate motor unit action potentials. The simulations indicated that: 1) only those motor units with muscle fibers located within 10–12 mm of the electrodes would contribute significant signal energy to the surface EMG, 2) variation in surface area of electrodes has little effect on the detection depth of motor unit action potentials, 3) increased interelectrode spacing moderately increases detection depth, and 4) the frequency content of action potentials decreases steeply with increased electrode-motor unit territory distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers BA, Put JHM, Wallinga W, Wirtz P (1989) Quantitative analysis of single muscle fiber action potentials recorded at known distances. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 73:245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen S, Arendt-Nielsen L (1987) Muscle fiber conduction velocity in motor units of the human anterior tibial muscle: a new size principle parameter. J Physiol (Lond) 391:561–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen S, Rosenfalck A (1978) Recording from a single motor unit during strong effort. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 25:501–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen S, Rosenfalck A (1981) Relationship of intracellular and extracellular action potentials of skeletal muscle fibers. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng 6:267–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JB, Rose PK, Vanner S, Bakker GJ, Richmond FJR (1988) Compartmentalization of motor units in the cat neck muscle, biventer cervicis. J Neurophysiol 60:21–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian JV, (1973) Electrodes and electrode connectors. In: Desmedt JE (eds) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, Karger, Basel, pp 502–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive: their functions revealed by electromyography, 5th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodine SC, Roy RR, Eldred E, Edgerton VR (1987) Maximal force as a function of anatomical features of motor units in the cat tibialis anterior. J Neurophysiol 57:1730–1745

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd DC, Lawrence PD, Bratty PJA (1978) On modeling the single motor unit action potential. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 25:236–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook MH, Engel WK (1969) The histographic analysis of human muscle biopsies with regard to fiber types. Neurology 19:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchthal F, Guld C, Rosenfalck P (1955) Propagation velocity in electrically activated muscle fibres in man. Acta Physiol Scand 34:75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchthal F, Guld C, Rosenfalck P (1957) Multielectrode study of the territory of a motor unit. Acta Physiol Scand 39:83–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RE (1981) Motor units: anatomy, physiology, and functional organization. In: Brooks VB (eds) Handbook of physiology, sect 1, vol II/1. American Physiological Society, Washington DC, pp 345–422

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca CJ, Merletti R (1988) Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69:568–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova N (1974) Model of the extracellular potential field of a single striated muscle fibre. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 14:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstedt J (1964) Human single muscle fiber action potentials. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 61:1–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstedt J, Stålberg E (1973) How the size of needle electrode leading-off surface influences the shape of the single muscle fibre action potential in electromyography. Comput Programs Biomed 3:204–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer SM, Studer RM, Moschytz GS (1984) Mathematical model of single-fiber action potential. Med Biol Eng Comput 22:433–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglevand AJ (1989) A motor unit pool model: relationship of neural ontrol properties to isometric muscle tension and the electromyogram. Ph. D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Gath I, Stålberg E (1975) Frequency and time domain characteristics of single muscle fibre action potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39:371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Gath I, Stålberg E (1977) On the volume conduction in human skeletal muscle: in situ measurements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43:106–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gath I, Stålberg E (1978) The calculated radial decline of the extracellular action potential compared with in situ measurements in the human brachial biceps. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:547–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes LA, Baker LE (1967) The specific resistance of biological material — a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng 5:271–293

    Google Scholar 

  • George RE (1970) The summation of muscle fibre action potentials. Med Biol Eng 8:357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Gootzen THJ, Stageman DF, Van Oostrerom A (1991) Finite limb dimensions and finite muscle length in a model for the generation of electromyographic signals. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81:152–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Griep PAM, Boon KL, Stegeman DF (1978) A study of the motor unit action potential by means of computer simulation. Biol Cybern 30:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve DW (1975) Electromyography. In: Grieve DW, Miller DI, Paul JP, Smith AJ (eds) Techniques for the analysis of human movement. Lepus, London, pp 109–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Gydikov A, Trayanova N (1986) Extracellular potentials of single active muscle fibres: effects of finite fibre length. Biol Cybern 53:363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Gydikov A, Gerilovsky L, Radicheva N, Trayanova N (1986) Influence of the muscle fibre and geometry on the extracellular potentials. Biol Cybern 54:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hary D, Belman MJ, Propst J, Lewis S (1982) A statistical analysis of the spectral moments used in EMG tests of endurance. J Appl Physiol 53:779–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar GF, Allin J, Kranz H (1987) Surface EMG spectral changes with muscle length. Med Biol Eng Comput 25:683–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaflitz M, Merletti R, De Luca CJ (1990) Inference of motor unit recruitment order in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. J Appl Physiol 68:1657–1667

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström L, Magnusson RI (1977) Interpretation of myoelectric power spectra: a model and its applications. Proc IEEE 65:653–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb GE, Gans C (1986) Electromyography for experimentalists. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorente de Nó R (1947) A study of nerve physiology, chap XVI. Analysis of the distribution of action currents of nerve in volume conductors. Stud Rockefellar Inst Med Res 132:384–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludin HP (1969) Microelectrode study of normal human skeletal muscle. Eur Neurol 2:340–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn PA, Bettles ND, Hughes AD, Johnson SW (1978) Influences of electrode geometry on bipolar recordings of the surface electromyogram. Med Biol Eng Comput 16:651–660

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill KC, Huynh A (1988) A model of the surface-recorded motor-unit action potential. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 10:1697–1699

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB (1975) The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. J Physiol (Lond) 246:549–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R (1973) The contractile properties of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions. J Physiol (Lond) 228:285–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrenhof JW, Abbink HJ (1985) Crosscorrelation and cross-talk in surface electromyography. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 25:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandedkar S, Stålberg E (1983) Simulation of macro EMG motor unit potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 56:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stålberg EV (1985) Selectivity of electromyographic recording techniques: a simulation study. Med Biol Eng Comput 23:536–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stålberg EV (1986) Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part I: turns and amplitude measurements. Muscle Nerve 9:423–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandekar SD, Stålberg EV, Sanders DB (1985) Simulation techniques in electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32:775–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker PA, Scott RN (1973) Statistics of the myoelectric signal from monopolar and bipolar electrodes. Med Biol Eng 11:591–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsey R (1964) Volume conductor fields of action currents. Biophys J 4:317–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsey R (1974) The active fiber in a volume conductor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 21:371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsey R (1977) Action potential sources and their volume conductor fields. Proc IEEE 65:601–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfalck P (1969) Intraand extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibers. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 47:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Stålberg E (1966) Propagation velocity in human muscle fibers in situ. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 70:1–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Stålberg E, Antoni L (1980) Electrophysiological cross section of the motor unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 43:469–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipp P (1978) Effect of electrode parameters on the bandwidth of the surface e.m.g. power spectrum. Med Biol Eng Comput 16:537–541

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Andrew J. Fuglevand, David A. Winter & Aftab E. Patla

  2. Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    David A. Winter & Daniel Stashuk

Authors
  1. Andrew J. Fuglevand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David A. Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aftab E. Patla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Stashuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuglevand, A.J., Winter, D.A., Patla, A.E. et al. Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing. Biol. Cybern. 67, 143–153 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201021

Keywords