Skip to main content
Log in

The magnetic and electric fields induced by superparamagnetic magnetite in honeybees

Magnetoperception: an associative learning?

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hairs on the abdomen of honeybees contain dendrites and a rod and ring structure composed of black particles, presumed to be superparamagnetic (SPM) magnetite. The rod and ring were divided into compartments and each compartment approximated by a dipole. The magnetic fields were calculated at a point P at various locations for a change of the external geomagnetic field from zero to 0.5 G in 0.1 s. The magnetite amplifies the external field at the rod/ring-dendrite interface. The induced electric field and potential difference for a small circular area are in the order of 10−7 V/m and 10−13 V respectively. Mechanisms are proposed for amplifying the electric fields in the dendrite and in an integrating nerve fibre. A hypothesis is developed for associative learning of visual and magnetic stimuli. If magnetic and visual inputs are associated in the ganglion and in the brain, very small changes of either magnetic or visual inputs could be perceived. A bee could sequentially follow the images associated with magnetic gradients on a cloudy day and find the food source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkon KL, Blackwell KT, Barbour GS, Rigler AK, Vogl TP (1990) Pattern-recognition by an artificial network derived from biological neuronal systems. Biol Cybern 62:363–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnod Y (1991) Models of interactions between cortical areas for sensory-motor programs. In: Physiological and computational aspects of cortical functions. Nato Advanced Research Workshop at Sirolo, Italy, May 91, Program and Abstracts, pp 16–17

  • Di Stefano G, Iacino L, Schiff H (1990) What the mantis shrimp's eye (possibly) tells its raptorial appendages. Biol Cybern 63:393–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman WJ (1990) On the problem of anomalous dispersion in chaoto-chaotic phase transitions of neural masses, and its significance for the management of perceptual information in brains. In: Haken H, Stadler M (eds) Synergetics of cognition. (Springer series in synergetics, vol 45) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 126–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman WJ (1991) La fisiologia della percezione. Scienze 272:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN (1991) Dynamic properties of visual cortical cells. In: Physiological and computational aspects of cortical functions. Nato Advanced Research Workshop at Sirolo, Italy, May 91, Program and Abstracts, pp 28–29

  • Gould JL (1985) Are animal maps magnetic? In: Kirschvink JL, Jones KS, MacFadden BJ (eds) Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in organisms: a new biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, pp 257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JL, Kirschvink JL, Deffeyes KS (1978) Bees have magnetic resonance. Science 202:1026–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacino L, Di Stefano G, Schiff H (1990) A neural model for localizing targets in space accomplished by the eye of a mantis shrimp. Biol Cybern 63:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn AJ (1974) The detection of electric fields from inanimate and animate sources other than electric organs. In: Fessard A (eds) Electroreceptors and other specialized receptors. (Handbook of sensory physiology vol III/3) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 147–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeton WT, Larkin TS, Windsor DM (1974) Normal fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field influence pigeon orientation. J Comp Physiol 95:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL (1989) Magnetite biomineralization and geomagnetic sensitivity in higher animals: an update and recommendations for future study. Bioelectromagnetics 10:239–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL, Gould JL (1981) Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic sensitivity in animals. Biosystems 13:181–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschvink JL, Kuwajima T, Ueno S, Kirschvink SJ, Diaz-Ricci J Morales A, Barwig S, Quinn J (1992) Discrimination of low-frequency magnetic fields by honeybees: biophysics and experimental tests. J Gen Physiol. Supplement on Sensory Transduction (Corey D. Roper S. eds) pp 225–240

  • Kuterbach DA, Walcott B, Reeder RJ, Frankel RB (1982) Iron-containing cells in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Science 218:695–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Leucht T (1984) Responses to light under varying magnetic conditions in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol [A] 154:865–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin H, Lindauer M (1977) Der Einfluss des Erdmagnetfeldes und die Schwereorientierung der Honigbiene. J Comp Physiol 122:145–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesson MH, Lowenstam HA (1985) Biomineralization processes of the radula teeth of chitons. In: Kirschvink JL, Jones DS, Mac-Fadden BJ (eds) Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in organisms: a new biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, pp 333–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesson MH, Kirschvink JL (1992) Ultrastructure and biophysics of magnetite-based magnetoreceptors in honeybees. Abstracts of the First World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine at Lake Buena Vista, Florida, June 92. Abstract Book, p 121

  • Schiff H (1991) Modulation of spike frequencies by varying the ambient magnetic field and magnetite candidates in bees (Apis mellifera). Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 100:975–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Semm P, Beason RC (1990) Responses to small magnetic variations by the trigeminal system of the bobolink. Brain Res Bull 25:735–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Towne WF, Gould JL (1985) Magnetic field sensitivities in honeybees. In: Kirschvink JL, Jones DS, MacFadden BJ (eds) Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in organisms: a new biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, pp 385–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott C, Gould JL, Kirschvink JL (1979) Pigeons have magnets. Science 184:180–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop B, Glantz RM (1985) Synaptic mechanisms of a tonic EPSP in crustacean visual interneurons: analysis and simulation. J Neurophysiol 54:636–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM (1984) Learned magnetic field discrimination in yellowfin tuna, Tunnus albacares. J Comp Physiol [A] 155:673–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM, Baird DL, Bitterman ME (1989) Failure of stationary but not of flying honeybees to respond to magnetic field stimuli. J Comp Psychol 103:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM, Bitterman ME (1989a) Attached magnets impair magnetic field discrimination by honeybees. J Expl Biol 141:447–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM, Bitterman ME (1989b) Conditioning analysis of magnetoreception in honeybees. Bioelectromagnetics 10:261–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker MM, Bitterman ME (1989c) Honeybees can be trained to respond to very small changes in geomagnetic field intensity. J Expl Biol 145:489–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkswo JP (1985) Cellular action currents. In: Chiabrera A, Nicolini C, Schwan HP (eds) Interactions between electromagnetic fields and cells. Plenum Press, New York, pp 173–189

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Prof. Dr. W. Reichardt, an outstanding scientist and personality, who will be greatly missed by all who knew him and his work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schilf, H., Canal, G. The magnetic and electric fields induced by superparamagnetic magnetite in honeybees. Biol. Cybern. 69, 7–17 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201404

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201404

Keywords

Navigation