Abstract
We quantified texture segregation by measuring psychophysically the percentage correct detection scores for each of a set of 10 texture-defined (TD) letters using the temporal two-alternative forced choice method, and at the same time quantified spatial discrimination of the TD form of measuring psychophysically the percentage correct letter recognition scores for the 10 letters. Ten levels of task difficulty were created by adding noise dots to the texture patterns. The resulting psychophysical data were used to test and compare models of the detection and recognition of texture-defined letters. Each model comprised a sequence of physiologically plausible stages in early visual processing. Each had the same first, second and third stages, namely linear orientation-tuned spatial filters followed by rectification and smoothing. Model 1 had only one non-linear stage. Model 2 had two non-linear stages. In model 2 the second non-linear stage was cross-orientation inhibition. This second non-linear stage enhanced the texture borders by, in effect, comparing textures at different locations in the texture pattern. In both models, the last stage modelled either letter detection or letter recognition. Letter recognition was modelled as follows. We passed a given letter stimulus through the first several stages of a model and, in 10 separate calculations, cross-correlated the output with a template of each of the 10 letters. From these 10 correlations we obtained a predicted percentage correct letter recognition score for the given letter stimulus. The predicted recognition scores closely agreed with the experimental data at all 10 levels of task difficulty for model 2, but not for model 1. We conclude that a borderenhancing algorithm is necessary to model letter recognition. The letter-detection algorithm modelled detection of part of a letter (a single letter stroke) in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio of a letter-segment detector. The predicted letter detection scores fitted the data closely for both models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985) Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am 2:284–299.
Beck J (1966a) Perceptual grouping produced by changes in orientation and shape. Science 154:538–540.
Beck J (1966b) Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping. Percept Psychophys 1:300–302.
Beck J (1967) Perceptual grouping produced by like figures. Percept Psychophys 2:419–495.
Beck J (1972) Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty. Am J Psychol 85:1–19.
Beck J (1982) Textural segmentation. In: Beck J (ed) Organization and representation in perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Beck J, Sutter A, Ivry R (1987) Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segmentation. Comp Vision Graphics Image Process 37:299–325.
Bergen JR (1991) Theories of visual texture perception. In: Regan D (ed) Vision and visual dysfunction, Vol 10B. Spatial vision. Macmillan, New York, pp 114–134.
Bergen JR, Adelson E (1988) Early vision and texture perception. Nature 333:363–364.
Bonds AB (1989) Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Vision Neurosci 2:41–55.
Burr D, Morrone C, Maffei L (1981) Intra-cortical inhibition prevents simple cells from responding to textured visual patterns. Exp Brain Res 43:455–458.
Caelli T (1985) The processing characteristics of visual segregation. Spatial Vis 1:19–30.
Chubb C, Landy MS (1991) Orthogonal distribution analysis: a new approach to the study of texture perception. In: Landy MS, Movshon JA (eds) Computation models of visual processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Clark M, Bovik AC (1989) Experiments in segmenting texton patterns using localized spatial filters. Pattern Recog 6:707–717.
Daugman JG (1980) Two dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vision Res 25:671–684.
Daugman JG (1988) Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression. IEEE Trans Acoustics Speech Signal Process 36:1169–1179.
DeValois RL, DeValois KK (1980) Spatial vision. Annu Rev Psychol 31:309–341.
DeValois KK, Tootell R (1983) Spatial-frequency-specific inhibition in cat striate cortical cells. J Physiol (Lond) 336:359–376.
Fogel I, Sagi D (1989) Gabor filters as texture discriminators. Biol Cybern 61:103–113.
Gilbert CD, Weisel TN (1990) The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in the primary visual cortex of the cat. Vision Res 30:1689–1701.
Gilbert CD, Hirsch JA, Weisel TN (1990) Lateral interactions in visual cortex. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quart Biol 55:663–667.
Graham N (1989) Visual pattern analyzers. Oxford University Press, New York.
Green DM, Swets JA (1973) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York.
Julesz B (1975) Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Sci Am 232:34–43.
Julesz B (1990) Early vision is bottom-up, except for focal attention. (Symp 55:The brain) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Long Island.
Julesz B, Krose B (1988) Visual texture perception: features and spatial filters. Nature 333:302–303.
Julesz B, Gilbert EN, Victor JD (1978) Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biol Cybern 31:137–140.
Landy MS, Bergen JR (1991) Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vision Res 31:679–691.
Malik J, Perona P (1990) Preattentive texture discrimination with early visual mechanisms. J Opt Soc Am A 7:923–932.
Marceltja S (1980) Mathematical descriptions of the responses of simple cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am 70:1297–1300.
Morrone MC, Burr D (1986) Evidence for the existence and development of visual inhibition in humans. Nature 321:235–237.
Morrone MC, Burr D, Maffei L (1982) Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 216:335–354.
Nelson JI, Frost B (1978) Orientation selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field. Brain Res 139:359–365.
Nothdurft HC (1991) Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast. Vision Res 31:1073–1078.
Nothdurft HC (1992) Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Percept Psychophys 52:355–375.
Parker A, Hawken MJ (1988) Two-dimensional spatial structure of receptive fields in monkey striate cortex. J Opt Soc Am A 5:598–605.
Regan D, Hong XH (1994) Recognition and detection of texture-defined letters. Vision Res 34:2403–2407.
Regan D, Regan MP (1986) Spatial frequency tuning, orientation tuning and spatial discrimination investigated by nonlinear analysis of pattern EP's (abstract). 3rd Int Evoked Potential Symp, Berlin.
Regan D, Regan MP (1987) Nonlinearity in human visual responses to two-dimensional patterns and a limitation of Fourier methods. Vision Res 27:2181–2183.
Regan D, Simpson TL (1995) Multiple sclerosis can cause visual processing deficits specific to texture-defined form. Neurology (in press)..
Rodieck RW, Stone J (1965) Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 28:833–849.
Rubenstein BS, Sagi D (1990) Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymetries. J Opt Soc Am A 7:1632–1643.
Sloan LL (1951) Measurement of visual acuity: a critical review. Arch Ophthalmol 45:704–725.
Sutter A, Beck J, Graham N (1989) Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model. Percept Psychophys 46:312–332.
Toyama K, Kimura M, Tanaka K (1981) Organization of cat visual cortex as investigated by cross-correlation techniques. J Neurophysiol 46:202–214.
Turner MR (1986) Texture-discrimination by Gabor functions. Biol Cybern 55:71–82.
VanEssen D, DeYoe EA, Olavarria J, Knierim J, Fox J, Sagi D, Julesz B (1989) Neural responses to static and moving texture patterns in visual cortex of the macaque monkey. In: Lam DMK, Gilbert CD (eds) Neural mechanisms of visual perception. Portfolio, Woodlands, Texas, pp 137–154.
Victor JD (1988) Models for preattentive texture discrimination: Fourier analysis and local feature processing in a unified framework. Spat Vision 3:263–280.
Victor JD, Brodie SE (1978) Discriminable textures with identical Buffon-needle statistics. Biol Cybern 31:231–234.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Regan, D., Hong, X.H. Two models of the recognition and detection of texture-defined letters compared. Biol. Cybern. 72, 389–396 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201414
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201414