Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of degree of uniformity on predicted visual cortical response tuning curves

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The different cortical visual cells exhibit a large repertoire of responses to sinusoidal gratings, depending on their receptive field structure and the stimulation parameters. It has been shown previously that the tuning curves and histogram shapes of cell responses are affected by subunit distances. One receptive field model (Spitzer and Hochstein 1985b) incorporated subunit distance but assigned it as a constant parameter, for ease of calculation. Here we investigate different tuning curve properties of various primary cortical cell types during testing of 10 deg of nonuniform distances of the receptive fields' subunits. The effect of nonuniformity was compared for average responses, tuning curve shapes, maximum peak responses, and bandwidths across four cell types of different sizes. The shapes and other properties of tuning curves are usually found to be retained also when the degree of uniformity is not very high for most of the cell types. In addition, the effect of uniformity is compared across these different response properties. The maximum peak responses of the tuning curve are found to display a lower coefficient of variation than the bandwidth, for all cell types, for most degrees of uniformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985) Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2:284–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht DG, Geiser WS (1991) Motion sensitivity and the contrastresponse function of simple cells in the visual cortex Visual Neurosci 7:531–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker CJR, Cynader MS (1987) Space-time separability of direction selectivity in cat striate cortex neurons. Vision Res 28:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop PO, Coombs JS, Henry GH (1973) Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. J Physiol 231:31–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarda RM, Petehans E, Bishop PO (1985) Simple cells in cat striate cortex: responses to stationary flashing and to moving light bars. Exp Brain Res 60:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valois RL, Albrecht DG, Threll LG (1982) Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22:545–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JH, Tsai-Chia Chou (1988) Temporal edges: the detection of motion and computation of optical flow. Iccr: 374–382

  • Fogel I, Sagi D (1989) Gabor filters as texture discriminators. Biol Cybern 61:103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster KH, Gaska JP, Nagler M, Pollen DA (1985) Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurons in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. J Physiol 365:331–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Glezer VD, Cooperman Am, Ivanov VA, Tsherbach TA (1976)An investigation of spatial frequency characteristics of complex receptive fields in the visual cortex of the cat. Vision Res 16:789–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Glezer VD, Tsherbach TA, Gauselman VE, Bondarko VM (1980) Linear and non-linear properties of simple and complex receptive fields in area 17 of the cat visual cortex. Biol Cybern 37:195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Glezer VD, Yakovlev VV, Gauzelman VE (1989) Spatial organization of subfields in receptive fields of cells in cat striate cortex. Vision Res 29:7, 777–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N, Sutter A, Venkkatesan C (1993) Spatial-frequency and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation. Vision Res. 33:1893–1911

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeger DJ (1992) Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neurosci 9:181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeger DJ (1993) Modeling simple cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-square, linear operators. J Neurophysiol 70:1885–1898

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggelund P (1985) Receptive field organization of simple and complex cells. In: Rose D, Dobson VG (eds) Models of visual cortex. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitger F, Rosenthaler L, Von der Heydt R, Peterhans (1992) Simulation of neuronal contour mechanisms: from simple to end-stopped cells. Vision Res 32:963–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1959) Receptive field of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol 148:547–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol 160:106–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JP, Stepnonki A, Palmer LA (1987) The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 6:1187–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowski JJ, Bishop PO (1981) Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 44:386–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowski JJ, Bishop PO (1982) Silent periodic cells in the striate cortex. Vision Res 22:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennie P, Krauskopt J, Scalar G (1990) Chromatic mechanisms in striate cortex of macaque. J. Neurosci 10:649–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Malonek D, Spitzer H (1989) Response histogram shapes and tuning curves: the predicted responses of several cortical cell types to drifting gratings stimuli. Biol Cybern 60:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D (1982) Vision. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean J, Palmer LA (1989) Contribution of linear spatiotemporal receptive field structure to velocity selectivity of simple cells in area 17 of cat. vision Res 29:675–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ (1978a) Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J physiol 283:79–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ (1978b) spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurons in area 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 283:101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullkin WH, Jones JP, Palmer LA (1984) Periodic simple cells in cat area 17. J Neurophysiol 2:372–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollen DA, Ronner SF (1975) Periodic changes across the receptive fields of complex cells in the striate and parastriate cortex of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 245:667–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollen DA, Ronner SF (1982) Spatial computation performed by simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. Vision Res 22:101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley R, Lennie P (1985) Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system. Ann Rev Neurosci 8:547–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer H, Almon M (1992) A visual motion model based on spatial and temporal edge detection. Proceedings of the 9th Israeli Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision, 147–187

  • Spitzer H, Hochstein S (1985a) Simple and complex-cell response dependencies on stimulation parameters. J Neurophysiol 53:1244–1265

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer H, Hochstein S (1985b) A complex-cell receptive-field model. J. Neurophysiol 53:1266–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer H, Hochstein S (1988) Complex-cell receptive field models. Prog Neurobiol 31:285–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer H, Almon M, Sandler VM (1993) A model for detection of spatial and temporal edges by a single X cell. Vision Res 33:1871–1880

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer H, Almon M, Sherman I (1994) A model for the early stages of motion processing based on spatial and temporal edge detection by cells. Spatial Vis 8:341–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter A, Beck J, Graham N (1989) Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: testing a simple spatial-frequency channels models. Percept Psychophys 46:312–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor JD, Conte MC (1991) Spatial organization of nonlinear interactions in form perception. Vision Res 9:1457–1488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almon, M., Spitzer, H. Effect of degree of uniformity on predicted visual cortical response tuning curves. Biol. Cybern. 72, 221–232 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201486

Keywords

Navigation