Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the mechanical properties of a manipulandum on human operator dynamics. II. Viscosity

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of the viscosity of a manipulandum used by a human operator in a position-control pursuit-tracking task was examined. An active servo-sys tem was used to set the viscosity of a manipulandum (motor) connected to the forearm to one of seven levels ranging in a geometric series from 12 to 800 N · s/m. During each condition the viscosity of the motor was held constant by a computer while subjects tracked, by moving their forearm in the sagittal plane, a visually presented target whose position changed randomly every 1.5s for 255s. Nonparametric and parametric impulse response functions were calculated between the input (target) and output (position) in each tracking condition. Nonparametric analyses revealed that subjects became sluggish at higher viscosities (above 200 N · s/m) and took longer to reach the target. A second-order low-pass transfer function was found to provide a very good description of tracking performance at each viscous level. The gain and damping parameter of this transfer function were not affected by the manipulandum's viscosity, whereas both the pure delay and natural frequency of the human operator system decreased systematically with increasing manipulandum viscosity. These findings suggest that over the range of viscosities studied, there is no speed-accuracy trade-off in terms of determining an optimal level of manipulandum viscosity for a human operator, and that a less viscous interface will result in faster performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RW, McRuer D (1979) The man/machine control interface in pursuit control. Automatica 15:683–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Baty DL (1969) Effects of display gain on human operator information processing rate in a rate control tracking task. IEEE Trans Man Machine Syst 10:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty J (1975) Applications of Wiener kernel analysis in psychology. The problem of manual control. In: McCann GD, Marmarelis PZ (eds) Proceedings of the 1st symposium on testing and identification of nonlinear systems. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, pp 339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Boff KR, Lincoln JE (1988) Engineering data compendium: human perception and performance, vol 3. AAMRL, Wright-Paterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Book WJ, Hannema DP (1980) Master-slave manipulator performance for various dynamic characteristics and positioning task parameters, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 10:764–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SC, Zahalak GI (1982) The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. J Biomech 15:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan RB, Childress DS (1990) On a unifying noise-velocity relationship and information transmission in human-machine systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20:1125–1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind JL, Sprague LT (1961) Transmission of information in simple manual control systems. IRE Trans Hum Factors Electron 2:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiori N, Richardson J, Bouin M (1991) Operator workload and system performance under different conditions of force feedback in a telemanipulation task. Ergonomics 34:193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagner DG, Webster JG (1988) Telepresence for touch and proprioception in teleoperator systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:1020–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerton M (1981) Tracking. In: Holding D (ed) Human skills. Wiley, New York, pp 177–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford B, Wood L, McAffee DA, Zak H (1991) Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 21:620–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JW (1970) A describing function analysis of tracking performance using two tactile displays. IEEE Trans Man Mach Syst 11:92–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland D, Noble ME (1953) The effect of physical constants of a control on tracking performance. J Exp Psychol 46:353–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter IW, Kearney RE (1982) Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. J Biomech 15:747–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter IW, Kearney RE (1983a) Generation of random sequences with jointly specified probability and autocorrelation functions. Biol Cybern 47:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter IW, Kearney RE (1983b) Two-sided linear filter identification. Med Biol Eng Comput 21:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter IW, Lafontaine S, Nielsen PMF, Hunter PJ, Hollerbach JM (1990) Manipulation and dynamic mechanical testing of microscopic objects using a tele-micro-robot system. IEEE Control Syst Mag 10:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen SC, Iversen EK, Davis CC, Potter DM, McLain TW (1989) Design of a multiple degree of freedom, force reflective hand master/slave with a high mobility wrist. In: 3rd Topical Meeting on Robotics and Remote Systems, March 13–16. Charlestown, North Carolina, USA

  • Jagacinski RJ, Miller DP, Gilson RD (1979) A comparison of kinesthetic-tactual and visual displays via a critical tracking task. Hum Factors 21:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski RJ, Flach JM, Gilson RD (1983) A comparison of visual and kinesthetic-tactual displays for compensatory tracking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 13:1103–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LA, Hunter IW (1990) Influence of the mechanical properties of a manipulandum on human operator dynamics. I. Elastic stiffness. Biol Cybern 62:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LA, Hunter IW (1993) A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Exp Brain Res

  • Kearney RE, Hunter IW (1990) System identification of human joint dynamics. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18:55–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles WB, Sheridan TB (1966) The “feel” of rotary controls: friction and inertia. Hum Factors 8:209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DH, Han K-W (1980) Analysis of human operator's behavior in high-order dynamic systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 10:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin ML, Radwin RG, Vanderheiden GC (1992) Gain effects on performance using a head-mounted computer input device. Ergonomics 35:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumelsky V (1991) On human performance in telerobotics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 21:971–982

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer D (1980) Human dynamics in man-machine systems. Automatica 16:237–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Merhav SJ, Ben Ya'acov O (1976) Control augmentation and work load reduction by kinesthetic information from the manipulator. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 6:825–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesplay KP, Childress DS (1988) Capacity of the human operator to move joints as control inputs to prostheses. ASME Model Control Issues Biomech Syst 12:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Weir DJ, Stein JF (1985) Visuomotor tracking with delayed visual feedback. Neuroscience 16:511–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani PB (1972) An auditory display in a dual-axis tracking task. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2:375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew RW, Duffendack JC, Fensch LK (1967) Sine-wave tracking revisited. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electron 8:130–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton EC (1974) Tracking skill and manual control. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju GJ, Verghese GC, Sheridan TB (1989) Design issues in 2-port network models of bilateral remote manipulation. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics Automation 3:1316–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki M, Inooka H, Ishikura T (1990) Manual control of a flexible arm and its application to an automatic control system IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20:718–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP, Bekey GA (1978) Tactile information processing by human operators in control systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8:860–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan TB, Ferrell WR (1974) Man-machine systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Takashima M, Yoshizawa S, Nagumo J (1980) Human operator dynamics in manual tracking systems with auditory input. Biol Cybern 37:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Tränkle U, Deutschmann D (1991) Factors influencing speed and precision of cursor positioning using a mouse. Ergonomics 34:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells MJ, Griffin MJ (1987) A review and investigation of aiming and tracking performance with head-mounted sights. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 17:210–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (1986) The effects of control dynamics on performance. In: uBoff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of human perception and performance, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 39–1–39–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, L.A., Hunter, I.W. Influence of the mechanical properties of a manipulandum on human operator dynamics. II. Viscosity. Biol. Cybern. 69, 295–303 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203126

Keywords

Navigation