Abstract
Tank and Hopfield have shown that networks of analog neurons can be used to solve linear programming (LP) problems. We have re-examined their approach and found that their network model frequently computes solutions that are only suboptimal or that violate the LP problem's constraints. As their approach has proven unreliable, we have developed a new network model: the goal programming network. To this end, a network model was first developed for goal programming problems, a particular type of LP problems. From the manner the network operates on such problems, it was concluded that overconstrainedness, which is possibly present in an LP formulation, should be removed, and we have provided a simple procedure to accomplish this.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hillier FS, Lieberman GJ (1986) Introduction to operations research. Holden-Day, Oakland Calif
Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1985) “Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biol Cybern 52:141–152
Kamgar-Parsi B, Kamgar-Parsi B (1990) On problem solving with Hopfield neural networks. Biol Cybern 62:415–423
Mead C (1989) Analog VLSI and neural systems. Addison Wesley, Reading Mass
Pyne IB (1956) Linear programming on an electronic analogue computer. Trans AIEE 75:139–143
Shawe-Taylor JS, Cohen DA (1990) Linear programming algorithm for neural networks. Neural Networks 3:572–582
Tank DW, Hopfield JJ (1986) Simple “neural” optimization networks: an A/D converter, signal decision circuit, and a linear programming circuit. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 33:533–541
Van Hulle MM (1991) A goal programming network for mixed integer linear programming: a case study for the job-shop scheduling problem, (accepted for publication in Int J Neural Syst)
Wilson GV, Pawley GS (1988) On the stability of the Travelling Salesman Problem algorithm of Hopfield and Tank. Biol Cybern 57:63–70
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Hulle, M.M. A goal programming network for linear programming. Biol. Cybern. 65, 243–252 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206222
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206222