Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between absolute disparity and ocular vergence

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The relationship between disparity and ocular vergence was investigated under closed-loop as well as under open-loop viewing conditions. First we examined whether vergence responded similarly to disparity presented under open-loop and closed-loop conditions. Similar response were observed in both conditions. The direct relationship between disparity and vergence was examined by presenting constant disparities between 0.2° and 4° under open-loop viewing conditions. Such vergence responses are described as the outputs of first-order low-pass filters with different filter characteristics for each amplitude of disparity. By analyzing the latency of vergence responses induced by constant disparities with help of the transfer function of disparitycontrolled vergence, the time delay of disparity processing in the vergence loop was estimated. We suggested that the time delay was approximately between 80 and 120 ms instead of 160 ms as is generally assumed. The relationship between the rate of disparity change and vergence was examined by comparing responses to ramp and stepwise changes in target vergence. From the similar responses to ramp and staircase changes in disparity we concluded that vergence is not sensitive to the velocity of target vergence as such. On the basis of these findings we developed a model of disparity-controlled vergence. In this model disparity is processed through several parallel, imperfect integrators with slightly different low-pass filter characteristics, each of them susceptible to a limited range of disparities. Gains as well as phase lags of vergence responses to sinusoidal disparities are accurately simulated by this model. As a consequence of the limited working range of the low-pass filters, the model correctly simulates the alterations of fast and slow phases in response to step and ramps of target vergence, which are characteristic of real vergence responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Collewijn H, Tamminga EP (1986) Human fixation and pursuit in normal and open-loop conditions: effects of central and peripheral retinal targets. J Physiol 379:109–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Collewijn H, Van der Mark F, Jansen TC (1975) Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Res 15:447–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming BG, Judge SJ (1986) Disparity-induced and blur-induced convergence eye movement and accommodation in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 55:896–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman WB, Tangney JF, Steinman RM, Ferguson JL (1984)Characteristics of smooth eye movements with stabilized targets. Vision Res 24:1003–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkelens CJ (1987) Adaptation of ocular vergence to stimulation with large disparities. Exp Brain Res 66:507–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1985) Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Res 25:1689–1700

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung GK, Semmlow JL, Ciuffreda KJ (1986) A dual mode dynamic model of the vergence eye movement system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-33:1021–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1978) Global stereopsis: cooperative phenomena in stereoscopic depth perception. In: Held R, Leibowitz HW, Teubner H-L (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VIII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 215–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan VV, Stark L (1977) A heuristic model for the human vergence eye movement system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-24:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashbass C (1981) Reflexions on the control of vergence. In: Zuber BL (eds) Models of oculomotor behavior and control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashbass C, Westheimer G (1961) Disjunctive eye movements. J Physiol 159:339–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movements using a scierai search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Electr BME-10:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DA (1973) Models of the saccadic eye movement control system. Kybernetik 14:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor CM (1979) The relationship between fusional vergence and fixation disparity. Vision Res 19:1359–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor CM (1980) Fixation dispersity: a steady state error of disparity-induced vergence. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57:618–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmlow JL, Hung GH, Ciuffreda KJ (1986) Quantitative assessment of disparity vergence components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:558–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg AV, Collewijn H (1989) Human smooth pursiut during transient perturbations of predictable and unpredictable arget motions. Exp Brain Res 72:95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G, Mitchell G (1956) Eye movement responses to convergent stimuli. Am Arch Ophthalmol 55:848–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber BL, Stark L (1968) Dynamical characteristics of the fusional vergence eye movement system. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern SSC-4:72–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pobuda, M., Erkelens, C.J. The relationship between absolute disparity and ocular vergence. Biol. Cybern. 68, 221–228 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224855

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224855

Keywords