Abstract
Logic is a popular word in the social sciences, but it is rarely used as a formal tool. In the past, the logical formalisms were cumbersome and difficult to apply to domains of purposeful action. Recent years, however, have seen the advance of new logics specially designed for representing actions. We present such a logic and apply it to a classical organization theory, J.D. Thompson's Organizations in Action. The working hypothesis is that formal logic draws attention to some finer points in the logical structure of a theory, points that are easily neglected in the discursive reasoning typical for the social sciences. Examining Organizations in Action we find various problems in its logical structure that should, and, as we argue, could be addressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BarwiseJ. and J.Etchemendy (1990), The Language of First-Order Logic. Stanford, CA: CSLI 23.
Baumol W. J. (1971), “On Rhe Behavioral Rheory of the Firm,” in R.Marris and A.Wood (Eds.) The Corporate Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 118–143.
Blumer H. (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Breton A. and R. Wintrobe (1982), The Logic of Bureaucratic Conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bruggeman, J. (1994), Niche Width Theory Reappraised, CCSOM Working Paper, 94–117.
Cohen M.D., J.G. March and J. P. Olsen (1972), “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choicew” Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1–25.
Cohen, M. R. and E. Nagel (1934), An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, New York.
CohenP. R. and H. J.Levesque (1987), Persistence, Intention and Commitment, in M. P.Georgeff and A. L.Lansky (Eds.) Proceedings of the 1986 Workshop on Reasoning About Actions and Plans, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 297–340.
CohenP. R. and H. J.Levesque (1990), “Intention is Choice with Commitment,” Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261.
Devlin K. (1994), “Situation Theory and Social Structure,” in M.Masuch and L.Pólos (Eds.) Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Logic at Work. Berlin: Springer, 197–237.
Devlin, K. and D. Rosenberg, “Situation Theory and Cooperative Action,” in Situation Theory and its Applications, 3 CSLI lecture notes, forthcoming.
French, S. (1988), Decision Theory, An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality. Ellis Horwood Limited.
GazendamH.W.M. (1993), Variety Controls Variety: On the Use of Organization Rheories in Information Management. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
GamutL.T.F. (1991), Logic, Language, and Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GiddensA. (1979), Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structures, and Contradiction in Cocial Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Glance N.S. and B.A. Huberman (1994), “Social Dilemmas and Fluid Organization,” in K.M.Carley and M.Prietula (Eds.), Computational Organization Theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 217–240.
Gouldner, A.W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity,” American Sociological Review 35.
GrandoriA. (1987), Perspectives on Organization Theory. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
HabermasJ. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
HannanM.T. and J.Freeman (1977), “The Population Ecology of Organizations,” American Journal of Sociology 82, 929–964.
HannanM.T. and J.Freeman (1989), Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harel, D. (1984), “Dynamic Logic,” in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, (Eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol.II, D. Reidel 497–604.
Huang, Z. and M. Masuch (1991), Reasoning About Action: A Comparative Survey, CCSOM Research Report, 91-37.
Huang, Z., M. Masuch and L. Pólos (1992), A Preference Logic for Rational Actions. CCSOM Research Report, 92-45.
HuangZ., M.Masuch and L.Pólos (1996), “ALX, An Action Logic for Agents with Bounded Rationality,” Artificial Intelligence 82, 75–127.
Huang, Z. and M. Masuch (1993), ALX3, A Multi-Agent Action Logic. CCSOM Working Paper, 93–102.
Johnon-LairdP.N. and P.C.Wason (1977), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnon-LairdP.N. and R.M.J.Byrne (1977), Deduction. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lindenberg S. (1991), “Die Methode der abnehmenden Abstraktion: Theoriegesteuerte Analyse und empirischer Gehalt,”, in H.Esser and K.Troitzsch (Eds.) Modellierung sozialer Prozesse. Bonn: Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften, 29–78.
LuhmannN. (1982), The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
ManhartK. (1994), “Strukturalistische Theorienkonzeption in den Sozialwissenschaften,” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23, 111–128.
March J.G. (1976); “The Technology of Foolishness,” in J.G.March and J.P.Olsen (Eds) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget, 69–81.
March J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1986), “Garbage Can Models of Decision Making in Organizations,” in J.G.March and R.Weissinger-Baylon (Eds) Ambiguity and Command, Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 11–53.
March J.G. and H.A. Simon (1958), Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Masuch, M. (1991), Formalization of Thompson's Organization in Action. CCSOM Research Report, 91-32.
Masuch M. (1992), “Artificial Intelligence in Organization and Management Theory,” in M.Masuch and M.Warglien (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Organization and Management Theory. Models of Distributed Intelligence. New York and Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Moore, R.C. (1985), A Formal Theory for Knowledge and Action. CSLI Report 85-31, Stanford University.
MontagueR. (1974), Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
MintzbergH. (1979), The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Padgett, J.F. (1980), “Managing Garbage Can Hierarchies,” in Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 583–604.
ParsonsT. (1937), The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
ParsonsT. (1960), Structure and Process in Modern Societies. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Péli, G. and M. Masuch (1994), “The Logic of Propagation Strategies,” Academy of Management Proceedings, forthcoming.
PéliG., J.Bruggeman, M.Masuch, and B. ÓNualláin (1994), “A Logical Approach to Organizational Ecology: Formalizing the Inertia-Fragment in First Order Logic,” American Sociological Review 59, 571–593.
Pólos, L. (1993), “Information States in Situation Semantics,” CCSOM Research Report, 93–98.
Pólos, L. (1993), “Updated Situation Semantics,” Journal of Symbolic Logics.
Pólos, L. (1994), “Scientific Rules and Empirical Generalization: Towards a Situational Theory of Theory Building,” CCSOM Report, 94–116.
Rao A. S. and Georgeff M. P. (1991), “Modelling Rational Agents Within a BDI-Architecture,” in J.Allen, R.Fikes, and E.Sandewall (Eds) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 473–484.
Salancik, G. R. and H. Leblebici (1993), “Grammars for Theories of Organization,” Workshop on Mathematical Organization Theory, Chicago IL.
SalmonW. (1990), Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
SchutzA. (1967), The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Simon H.A. (1955), “A behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99–118.
SimonH. A. (1964), “On the Concept of Organizational Goal,” Administrative Science Quarterly 9, 1–22.
SimonH.A. (1987), “Bounded Rationality,” in J.Eatwell, et al. (Eds.) The New Palgrave, London: Macmillan Press.
StalnakerR. (1968), “A Theory of Conditional,” Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly 2, 98–122.
ThompsonJ.D. (1967), Organizations in Action, Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Von Wright, G.H. (1963), The Logic of Preference. Edinburgh.
WilliamsonO.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masuch, M., Huang, Z. A case study in logical deconstruction: Formalizing J.D. Thompson's Organizations in Action in a multi-agent action logic. Comput Math Organiz Theor 2, 71–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240422
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240422