Skip to main content
Log in

Proving equivalence of different axiomatizations of free groups

  • Problem Corner
  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The equivalence problem of different non-classical equational axiomatizations of free groups due to Higman and Neumann, Neumann, and others, is discussed. It is shown that such problems can be done easily using a rewrite rule based theorem prover such as RRL by generating complete rewriting systems for these axiomatizations. Some of these complete rewriting systems are obtained after introducing new function symbols which do not appear in the original non-classical axiomatizations. It is, however, suspected that these equivalence problems can be a considerable challenge for theorem provers based on other paradigms, such as natural deduction, resolution (clausal as well as non-clausal), and connection graphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dershowitz, N., ‘Termination of rewriting’, J. Symbolic Computation 3, 69–116 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Detlefs, D., and Forgaard, R., ‘A procedure for automatically proving the termination of a set of rewrite rules’, Proc. of the 1st Intl. Conf. on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA-85). Dijon, France. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 202 (ed. Jouannaud), Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 255–270 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Higman, G., and Neumann, B. H., ‘Groups as groupoids with one law’, Publ. Math. Debrecen. 2, 215–227 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kapur, D., and Sivakumar, G., ‘Experiments with and architecture of RRL, a Rewrite Rule Laboratory’, in. Proc. of An NSF workshop on the Rewrite Rule Laboratory, Sept. 1983, General Electric R & D Center Report 84GEN008, pp. 33–56 (1984).

  5. Kapur, D., and Zhang, H., ‘RRL: A Rewrite Rule Laboratory,’ Proc. of 9th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE-9), Argonne, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 310 (eds. Lusk and Overbeek), Springer Verlag, New York, 768–769 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kapur, D., and Zhang, H., RRL: A Rewrite Rule Laboratory — A User's Manual, General Electric R & D Center (June, 1987).

  7. Knuth, D., and Bendix, P., ‘Simple word problems in universal algebras,’ in: J. Leech (ed.) Computational Problems in Abstract Algebras, Pergamon Press (1970).

  8. Lescanne, P., ‘Term rewriting systems and algebra’, Proc. of 7th Intl. Conf. on Automated Deduction (CADE-7), Napa Valley, Calif., Lecture Notes in Computer Science 170 (ed. Shostak) Springer Verlag, New York, 166–174 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, U., Doing Algebra with REVE, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Technical Report UMCS-86-10-4 (June, 1986).

  10. Neumann, B. H., ‘Another single law for groups,’ Bull. Austr. Math. Soc., 23, 81–102 (1981) as quoted in [9] above.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work partially supported by the NSF Grant No. CCR-8408461.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapur, D., Zhang, H. Proving equivalence of different axiomatizations of free groups. J Autom Reasoning 4, 331–352 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244946

Key words

Navigation