Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Arresting circles in formal dialogues

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. John A. Barker, ‘The Fallacy of Begging the Question’, Dialogue XV (1976) 241–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. AugustusDe Morgan, Formal Logic, London, Taylor and Walton, 1847.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. L. Hamblin, Fallacies, London, Methuen, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jaakko Hintikka, Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Hoffman, ‘On Begging the Question at Any Time’, Analysis 32 (1972) 197–99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saul Kripke, ‘Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic I’, Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, ed. by J. N. Crossley and M. A. E. Dummett, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1965, pp. 92–130.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Lorenzen, ‘Ein Dialogisches Konstruktivitatskriterium’, in Infinitistic Methods, New York, Pergamon Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David Samford, ‘Begging the Question’, Analysis 32 (1972) 197–99.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Stegmüller, ‘Remarks on the Completeness of Logical Systems Relative to the Validity Concepts of P. Lorenzen and K. Lorenz’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 5 (1964) 81–112.

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Woods and Douglas Walton, ‘Petitio Principii’, Synthese 31 (1975) 107–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Woods and Douglas Walton, ‘Petitio and Relevant Many-Premissed Arguments’, forthcoming in Logique et Analyse.

  12. FrankVan Dun, ‘On the Modes of Opposition in the Formal Dialogues of P. Lorenzen’, Logique et Analyse 57–58 (1972) 103–136.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kathleen Johnson Wu, ‘A New Approach to Formalization of a Logic of Knowledte and Belief’, Logique et Analyse 63–64 (1973) 513–525.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

    John Woods & Douglas Walton

  2. University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Canada

    John Woods & Douglas Walton

Authors
  1. John Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas Walton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We are indebted to participants of the Logic Seminar, at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, for comments on an earlier draft read to that group by one author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woods, J., Walton, D. Arresting circles in formal dialogues. J Philos Logic 7, 73–90 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00245921

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00245921

Keywords

Search

Navigation