Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of model-based path control algorithms for direct-drive SCARA robots

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various advanced control strategies are applied to a direct-drive SCARA robot and studied in computer simulations. Besides computed torque control and direct adaptive control, heuristic optimal control, a new path control scheme for robotic manipulators, is included in the comparison study. PD control, the traditional robot control method, is used for generating a comparing baseline. While all schemes are applied for the same tracking task, the effect of modelling errors and measurement noise is considered in robot performance evaluation. Simulation results show that (1) without model errors, all advanced control schemes can achieve higher tracking accuracy than PD control; (2) with a random measurement error of 1%, computed torque and direct adaptive control methods are inferior to PD control; (3) heuristic control proves to be the most robust control scheme in case of mixed model and measurement errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuntze, H.-B., Closed-loop algorithms for industrial robots-status and recent trends, Proc. 1st IFAC Symposium on Robot Control (Syroco '85), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 437–444 (1985).

  2. Xu, X. and Schmidt, G., A new path control method for manipulator systems-heuristic control, submitted for publication (1991).

  3. Pearl, J., Heuristics: Intelligent Search Strategies for Computer Problem Solving, Addison Wesley, New York (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chartfield, C., The Analysis of Time Series. An Introduction, Chapman and Hall, London (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paul, R., Robot Manipulators, MIT Press, Reading, Mass. (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Slotine, J.-J.E. and Li, W., On the adaptive control of robot manipulators, Int. J. Robotics Res. 6, 49–59 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luh, J.Y.S., Walker, M.W. and Paul, R.P.C., Resolved acceleration control of mechanical manipulators, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-25, 468–474 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Slotine, J.-J.E. and Li, W., Adaptive manipulator control: a case study, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, AC-33, 995–1003 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayeda, H., Yoshida, K. and Osuka, K., Base parameters of manipulator dynamic models, 5th IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, April 1988, Vol. 3, pp. 1367–1373 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richalet, J., Rault, A., Testud, J.L. and Papon, J., Model predictive heuristic control: application to industrial processes, Automatica 14, 413–428 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cutler, C.R. and Ramaker, B.C., Dynamic matrix control — a computer control algorithm, JACC, San Francisco, Paper WP5-B (1980).

  12. ElMaraghy, H.A. and Johns, B., An investigation into the compliance of SCARA robots, Trans. ASME 110, 18–30 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, G., Xu, X. A comparison of model-based path control algorithms for direct-drive SCARA robots. J Intell Robot Syst 5, 241–252 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247420

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247420

Key words

Navigation