Skip to main content
Log in

Tensor-Krylov methods for large nonlinear equations

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we describe tensor methods for large systems of nonlinear equations based on Krylov subspace techniques for approximately solving the linear systems that are required in each tensor iteration. We refer to a method in this class as a tensor-Krylov algorithm. We describe comparative testing for a tensor-Krylov implementation versus an analogous implementation based on a Newton-Krylov method. The test results show that tensor-Krylov methods are much more efficient and robust than Newton-Krylov methods on hard nonlinear equations problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Bouaricha, “Solving large sparse systems of nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems using tensor methods on sequential and parallel computers,” Ph.D. Thesis, Cmputer Science Department, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1992.

  2. A. Bouaricha and R.B. Schnabel, “TENSOLVE: A software package for solving systems of nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares problems using tensor methods,” Preprint MCS-P463-0894, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 1994.

  3. A. Bouaricha and R.B. Schnabel, “Tensor methods for large, sparse systems of nonlinear equations,” Preprint MCS-P473-1094, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 1994.

  4. P.N. Brown and Y. Saad, “Globally convergent techniques in nonlinear Newton-Krylov algorithms,” Technical Report, L.-316, Computing and Mathematics Research Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1989.

  5. P.N.Brown and Y.Saad, “Hybrid Krylov methods for nonlinear systems of equations,” SIAM J. Stat. Comp., vol. 11, pp. 450–481, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.E.Dennis and R.B.Schnabel, Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.Feng, P.Frank, and R.B.Schnabel, “Local convergence analysis of tensor methods for nonlinear equations,” Math. Prog., vol. 62, pp. 427–459, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y.Saad, “Krylov subspace methods for solving unsymmetric linear systems,” Math. Comp., vol. 37, pp. 105–126, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y.Saad and M.H.Schultz, “Conjugate gradient-like algorithms for solving nonsymmetric linear systems,” Math. Comp., vol. 44, pp. 417–424, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y.Saad and M.H.Schultz, “GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 7, pp. 856–869, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.B.Schnabel and P.D.Frank, “Tensor methods for nonlinear equations,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 21, pp. 815–843, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.B.Schnabel, J.E.Koontz and B.E.Weiss, “A modular system of Algorithms of unconstrained minimization,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw., vol. 11, pp. 419–440, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.N.Shadid and R.S.Tuminaro, “Sparse iterative algorithm software for large-scale MIMD machines: An initial discussion and implementation,” Technical Report Sand91–0059, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Simonsini and E. Gallopoulos, “Convergence properties of block GMRES for solving systems with multiple right-sides,” Technical Report 1316, Center for Supercomputing Research and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1992.

  15. V.Simonsini and E.Gallopoulos, “An iterative method for nonsymmetric systems with multiple right handhand sides,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 16, pp. 917–933, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.Sonneveld, “CGS: A fast Lanczos-type solver for nonsymmetric linear system,” SIAMJ. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 10, pp. 36–52, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.Van DerVost, “Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 13, pp. 631–644, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part of this work was performed while the author was research associate at CERFACS (Centre Européen de Recherche et de Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique).

Research supported in part by the Office of Scientific Computing, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouaricha, A. Tensor-Krylov methods for large nonlinear equations. Comput Optim Applic 5, 207–232 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248265

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248265

Keywords

Navigation