Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a model theory of diagrams

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A logical system is studied whose well-formed representations consist of diagrams rather than formulas. The system, due to Shin [2, 3], is shown to be complete by an argument concerning maximally consistent sets of diagrams. The argument is complicated by the lack of a straight forward counterpart of atomic formulas for diagrams, and by the lack of a counterpart of negation for most diagrams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Polythress and H. Sun. A Method to Contruct Convex, Connected Venn Diagrams for Any Finite Number of Sets. Pentagon, 1972.

  2. Sun-Joo Shin. The Logical Status of Diagrams. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

  3. Sun-Joo Shin. A Situation-Theoretic Account of Valid Reasoning with Venn Diagrams. In J. Barwise et al., (eds), Situation Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2. Stanford: CSLI, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. More Trenchard. On the Construction of Venn Diagrams, Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (1959), 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are grateful to Jon Barwise and an anonymous referee for valuable comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammer, E., Danner, N. Towards a model theory of diagrams. J Philos Logic 25, 463–482 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257381

Keywords

Navigation