Bibliography
Bar-Hillel, Yeshoshua: 1954, ‘Logical Syntax and Semantics’, Language 30, 230–237.
Chomsky, Noam: 1955, ‘Logical Syntax and Semantics: Their Linguistic Relevance’, Language 31, 36–45.
Chomsky, Noam: 1957, Syntactic Structures, The Hague.
Chomsky, Noam: 1971, ‘Deep Sturcture, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation’, in Steinberg and Jakobovits, 1971, 183–216.
Gleitman, Lila and Gleitman, Henry: 1970, Phase and Paraphrase, New York.
Harman, Gilbert and Davidson, Donald: 1971, Semantics of Natural Languages, Dordrecht.
Hintikka, Jaakko, Moravcsik, Julius, and Suppes, Patrick: 1972m Approaches to Natural Language, Dordrecht, 1973.
Jackendoff, Ray: 1969, Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English, MIT dissertation.
Katz, Jerrold and Postal, Paul: 1964, An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions, Cambridge.
Lakoff, George: 1971, ‘On Generative Semantics’, in Steinberg and Jakobovits, 1971, 232–296.
Lakoff, George: 1972, ‘Linguistics and Natural Logic’, in Harman and Davidson, 1971, 545–665.
Lewis, David: 1971, ‘General Semantics’ Synthese 22, 18–67.
Montague, Richard: 1970a, ‘English as a Formal Language’, in Visentini et al., 1970, 189–224.
Montague, Richard: 1970b, ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria 36, 373–398. English' in Hintikka et al., 1973, 221–242.
Partee, Barbara: 1970, ‘Negation, COnjunction, and Quantifiers: Syntax vs Semantics’, Foundations of Language 6, 153–165.
Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge.
Reichenbach, Hans: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York.
Steinberg, Danny and Jakobovits, Leon: 1971, Semantics, Cambridge, England.
Stockwell, Robert, Schachter, Paul, and Partee, Barbara: 1973, The Major Syntactic Sturctures of English, New York.
Tarski, Alfred: 1944. ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–375.
Vermazen, Bruce: 1967, ‘A review of Katz and Postal (1964) and Katz (1966)’, Synthese 17, 350–365.
Visentini, bruno, Et al.: 1970, Linguaggi nella societa e nella tecnica, Milan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is a written version of a talk given in April, 1972, in the Linguistics and Semantics Workshop at the University of Western Ontario. A preliminary version was given in March at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and a version was also given at a colloquium at UC San Diego. The first part of the paper, like the first part of the talks, is a condensation of a talk which I gave in various forms and places in the fall and winter 1971–72. A fuller treatment of the same subject can be found in my ‘Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar’. My debts to others in this work are too numerous to list here, but I must at least mention Richmond Thomason, whose suggestions about the abstraction operator helped me get by first ideas about how to accommodate transformations in the Montague framework; Michael Bennett, whose continuing extensions of Montague's work have fertilized and challenged my own; David Kaplan, who has given me constant encouragement and taught me a great deal about philosophy and logic; and of course Richard Montague and Noam Chomsky, without whom I wouldn't have had a starting point. I am also grateful to all the students and other audiences who have given me helpful comments and criticisms, particularly the linguistics and philosophy students in my Montague seminar at UCLA, Winter-Spring, 1972.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Partee, B. Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar. J Philos Logic 2, 509–534 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262953
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262953