Skip to main content
Log in

A single primitive trope relation

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • BaconJohn, ‘Four modal modelings’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (1988), pp. 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • FraasenBas C.van, ‘Facts and tautological entailments’, Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969), pp. 477–487, and in Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity 1 by Alan Ross Anderson and Nucl D. Belnap Jr., Princeton University Press, 1975, pp. 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodmanNelson, The Structure of Appearance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • HochbergHerbert, ‘A refutation of moderate nominalism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (1988) pp. 188–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinseyJ. C. C., ‘A new definition of truth’, Synthese 7 (1949), pp. 428–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • StoutG. F., ‘The nature of universals and propositions’, Proceedings of the British Academy 10 (1921), pp. 157–172; reprinted in the The Problem of Universals, ed. Charles Landesman, Basic Books. New York, 1971, pp 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • WilliamsD. C., ‘The elements of being’, in his Principles of Empirical Realism, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, 1966, pp. 74–109; slightly abridged from ‘On the elements of being’, Review of Metaphysics 7 (1953), pp. 3–18, 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bacon, J. A single primitive trope relation. J Philos Logic 18, 141–154 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293445

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293445