Abstract
Cognitive science uses the notion of computational information processing to explain cognitive information processing. Some philosophers have argued that anything can be described as doing computational information processing; if so, it is a vacuous notion for explanatory purposes.
An attempt is made to explicate the notions of cognitive information processing and computational information processing and to specify the relationship between them. It is demonstrated that the resulting notion of computational information processing can only be realized in a restrictive class of dynamical systems called physical notational systems (after Goodman's theory of notationality), and that the systems generally appealed to by cognitive science-physical symbol systems-are indeed such systems. Furthermore, it turns out that other alternative conceptions of computational information processing, Fodor's (1975) Language of Thought and Cummins' (1989) Interpretational Semantics appeal to substantially the same restrictive class of systems.
The necessary connection of computational information processing with notationality saves the enterprise from charges of vacuousness and has some interesting implications for connectionism. But, unfortunately, it distorts the subject matter and entails some troubling consequences for a cognitive science which tries to make notationality do the work of genuine mental representations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Broadbent, D. (1985), ‘A Question of Levels: Comment on McClelland and Rumelhart’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 114 (2), pp. 189–192.
Chomsky, N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1980), ‘Rules and Representations’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 1–61.
Churchland, P. S. (1986), Neurophilosophy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cummins, R. (1989), Meaning and Mental Representation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cussins, A. (1990), ‘The Connectionist Construction of Concepts’, in M.A. Boden, ed., The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. (1987), The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dretske, F. (1989), ‘Putting Information to Work”, in P.P. Hanson, ed., Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
Elgin, C. Z. (1983), With Reference to Reference, Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co.
Fodor, J. A. (1975), The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1981a), ‘The Mind-Body Problem’, Scientific American 244 (1), pp. 114–123.
Fodor, J. A. (1981b), ‘Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology,’ in J. Haugeland, ed., Mind Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1987), Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988), ‘connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’, Cognition 28, pp. 3–71.
Goel, V. (1990a), ‘Specifying and Classifying Representational Systems: A Critique and Proposal for Cognitive Science’, manuscript submitted for publication.
Goel, V. (1990b), ‘Smolensky's PTC: Having It Both Ways’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2), pp. 400–401.
Goel, V. (1991), ‘Sketches of Thought: An Empirical and Logical Investigation into the Role of Sketching in Design Problem Solving’, Ph.D. Dissertation, UC-Berkeley.
Goodman, N. (1976), Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols (Second Edition), Indianpolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co.
Hamacher, V. C., Vranesic, Z. G., and Zaky, S. G. 1978, Computer Organization, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Haugeland, J. (1978), ‘Nature and Plausibility of cognitivism’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, pp. 215–226.
Haugeland, J. (1984), Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hinton, G. E. and Sejnowski, T. J. (1986), ‘Learning and Relearning in Boltzmann Machines,’ in D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group, eds., Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983), Mental Models, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kohlers, P. A. and Smythe, W. E.(1984), ‘Symbol Manipulation: Alternatives to the Computational View of Mind’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, pp. 289–314.
Marr, D. (1979), ‘Representing and Computing Visual Information’, in P. H. Winston and R. H. Brown, eds., Artificial Intelligence: An MIT Perspective, Volume 2, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E., and Hinton, G. E. (1986), ‘The Appeal of Parallel Distributed Processing’, in D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group, eds., Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McGinn, C. (1989), Mental Content, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Miller, G. (1963), Psychology: The Science of Mental Life, N.Y.: Harper and Row.
Newell, A. (1980), ‘Physical Symbol Systems,’ Cognitive Science 4, pp. 135–183.
Newell, A. (1982), ‘The Knowledge Level,’ Artificial Intelligence 18, pp. 87–127.
Newell, A. (1986), ‘The Symbol Level and Knowledge Level,’ in Z. W. Pylyshyn and W. Demopoulos, eds., Meaning and Cognitive Structure: Issues in the Computational Theory of Mind, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Newell, A. (1987), ‘Foundations of cognitive Systems,’ William James Lectures, Harvard University.
Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1972), Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Newell, A. and simon, H. A. (1981), ‘Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search’, in J. Haugeland, ed., Mind Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984), Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reeke, G. N. Jr. and Edelman, G. M. (1988), ‘Real Brains and Artificial Intelligence’, Daedalus 117 (1), pp. 143–173.
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1988), ‘Levels Indeed! A Response to Broadbent,’ Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 114 (2), pp. 193–197.
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1986), ‘PDP Models and General Issues in Cognitive Science,’ in D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group, eds., Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R. (1980), ‘Minds, Brains and Programs,’ The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 417–457.
Searle, J. R. (1983), Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1984), Minds, Brains and Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1990), ‘Models and Reality’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2), p. 399.
Skinner, B. F. (1953), Science and Human Behavior, N.Y.: Macmillan.
Smith, B. C. (forthcoming), A View from Somewhere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smolensky, P. (1986), ‘Intormation Processing in Dynamical Systems: Foundations of Harmony Theory,’ in D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group, eds., Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smolensky, P. (1988), ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism,’ The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1), pp. 1–74.
Tank, D. W. and Hopfield, J. J. (1987), Collective Computation in Neuronlike Circuits’, Scientific American 257 (6), pp. 104–114.
Wegner, Peter. (1968), ‘Programming Languages, Information Structures, and Machine Organization, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goel, V. Notationality and the information processing mind. Minds and Machines 1, 129–165 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361034
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361034