Skip to main content
Log in

R⌝-algebras and R⌝-model structures as power constructs

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In relevance logic it has become commonplace to associate with each logic both an algebraic counterpart and a relational counterpart. The former comes from the Lindenbaum construction; the latter, called a model structure, is designed for semantical purposes. Knowing that they are related through the logic, we may enquire after the algebraic relationship between the algebra and the model structure. This paper offers a complete solution for the relevance logic R⌝. Namely, R⌝-algebras and R⌝-model structures can be obtained from each other, and represented in terms of each other, by application of power constructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. R. Anderson and N. D. Belnap, Jr., Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. L. Bell and A. B. Slomson, Models and Ultraproducts, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. N. Bleicher, H. Schneider and R. L. Wilson, Permanence of identities on algebras, Algebra Universalis 3 (1973), pp. 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Brink, Power structures and logic, Quaestiones Mathematicae 9 (1986), pp. 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. H. Bruck, A Survey of Binary Systems, Springer, Berlin, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. D. Comer, Combinatorial aspects of relations, Algebra Universalis 18 (1984), pp. 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Drescher and O. Ore, Theory of multigroups, American Journal of Mathematics 60 (1938), pp. 705–733.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Dunn, Relevance logic and entailment, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic Vol. III, Synthese Library Vol. 166, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986, pp. 117–224.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. D. Gautam, The validity of equations of complex algebras, Archiv für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung 3 (1957), pp. 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. B. Halsted, Rational Geometry, J. Wiley & Sons, London, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Henkin, J. D. Monk and A. Tarski, Cylindric Algebras, Parts I and II. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971 and 1985. (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics Vols. 64 and 115.)

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Jonsson and A. Tarski, Boolean algebras with operators, Parts I and II. American Journal of Mathematics 73 (1951), pp. 891–939; 74 (1952), pp. 127–162.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. R. Kline, Double elliptic geometry in terms of point and order alone, Annals of Mathematics 18 (1916–17), pp. 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. K. Meyer, Sententical constants in relevant implication, Research Paper No. 2, Logic Group, Department of Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. K. Meyer, A Boolean-valued semantics for R, Research Paper No. 4, Logic Group, Department of Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. K. Meyer and R. Routley, Algebraic analysis of entailment, Logique et Analyse 15 (1972), pp. 407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. K. Meyer and R. Routley, Algebraic analysis of entailment, II, Typescript, Department of Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. K. Meyer and R. Routley, Classical relevant logics, Parts I and II, Studia Logica 32 (1973), pp. 51–66; 33 (1974), pp. 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. K. Meyer and J. K. Slaney, Abelian logic (From A to Z), Research Paper No. 7, Logic Group. Department of Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Prenowitz, Projective geometries as multigroups, American Journal of Mathematics 65 (1943), pp. 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Prenowitz, Descriptive geometries as multigroups, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 59 (1946), pp. 333–380.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Prenowitz, Spherical geometries and multigroups, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 2 (1950), pp. 100–119.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Prenowitz and J. Jantosciak, Join Geometries, Springer, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Rasiowa, An Algebraic Approach to Non-Classical Logics, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1974. (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 78.)

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Routley and R. K. Meyer, The semantics of entailment, in H. Le Blanc (Ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973. (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 68), pp. 194–243.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Shafaat, On varieties closed under the construction of power algebras, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 11 (1974), pp. 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Shafaat, Constructions preserving the associative and the commutative laws, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society Series A, 21 (1976), pp. 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Shafaat, Homomorphisms, homomorphic relations and power algebras, Periodica Mathematica Hungarica 11 (1980), pp. 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. E. Szabo, The continuous realizability of entailment, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 29 (1983), pp. 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Tarski, On the calculus of relations, Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (1941), pp. 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Urquhart, Relevant implication and projective geometry, Logique et Analyse 26 (1983), pp. 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brink, C. R⌝-algebras and R⌝-model structures as power constructs. Stud Logica 48, 85–109 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370636

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370636

Keywords

Navigation