Abstract
It is shown that a linguistically well-motivated semantical analysis of certain extensions of categorical sentences is compatible with a semantics that fulfils the so-called existential import condition, but is not compatible with a semantics that does not fulfil this condition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Seiler, Relativsatz, Attribut und Apposition, Wiesbaden 1960.
P. Suppes, Semantics of context-free fragments of natural languages, In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (Eds.) Approaches to Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel 1973, pp. 370–394.
P. Suppes, Elimination of quantifiers in the semantics of natural language by use of extended relation algebras, Revue Internationale de Philosophie (1976), pp. 117–118, 243–259.
P. Suppes, Logical inference in English: A preliminary analysis, Studia Logica 38 (1979), pp. 375–391.
P. Suppes, Variable-free semantics for negations with prosodic variation. In E. Saarinen, R. Hilpinen, I. Niiniluoto, and M. P. Hintikka (Eds.) Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka, Dordrecht: Reidel 1979, pp. 49–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was written during a stay at the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences at Stanford University and funded by grant No. Bo 778 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
I wish to thank Patrick Suppes for critical remarks and to gratefully acknowledge the use of the facilities of the Institute of Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences and the Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Böttner, M. A note on existential import. Stud Logica 47, 35–40 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374050
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374050