Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. BarwiseJon and PerryJohn (1983), situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CormackAnabel (1987), ‘Review of Mental Spaces’, Linguistics and Philosophy 10, pp. 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fauconnier, Gilles (forthcoming), Cognitive Mappings for Language and Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press.

  4. GazdarGerald (1979), Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. JackendoffRay (1975), ‘On Belief Contexts’, Linguistic Inquiry 6, pp. 59–93.

    Google Scholar 

  6. KampHans (1984), ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J.Groenendijk, T. M. V.Janssen, and M.Stokhof, eds., Truth, Interpretation, and Information, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. KampHans, and ReyleEwe (1993), From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic, and Discourse Representation Theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. KripkeSaul (1979), ‘A Puzzle About Belief’, in A.Margalit, ed., Meaning and Use, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 239–283.

    Google Scholar 

  9. LewisDavid (1968), ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, Journal of Philosophy 65, pp. 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McConnell-GinetSally (1987), ‘Review of Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language’, Language 63, pp. 142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  11. NunbergGeoffrey (1978), The Pragmatics of Reference, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  12. NunbergGeoffrey (1979), ‘The Non-Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, pp. 143–184.

    Google Scholar 

  13. RussellBertrand (1905), ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14, pp. 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BrugmanClaudia (1988), The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon, New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  2. FillmoreCharles J., and KayPaul (1993), ‘Construction Grammar Coursebook,’ course notes for Linguistics X20, Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley Linguistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GoldbergAdele E. (1995), Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HerskovitsAnnette (1986), Language and Spatial Cognition, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. LakoffGeorge (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LangackerRonald W. (1987, 1991), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volumes I and II, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindner, Susan (1981), ‘A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of Verb-Particle Constructions with UP and OUT’, Ph.D. dissertation, San Diego: University of California at San Diego.

  8. LinkGodehard (1983), ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in R.Baeuerle, C.Schwarze, and A.vonStechnow, eds., Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 302–323.

    Google Scholar 

  9. PollardCarl, and SagIvan A. (1994), Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. TalmyLeonard (1988), ‘The Relation of Grammar to Cognition’, in B.Rudzka-Ostyn, ed., Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 165–205.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BoërStephen, and LycanWilliam G. (1986), Knowing Who, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CarnapRudolph (1947), Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CastañedaHector-Neri (1972), ‘Thinking and the Structure of the World’, Philosophia 4 (1974) 3–40; reprinted in 1975 in Critica 6 (1972) 43–86.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CastañedaHector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ChurchAlonzo (1950), ‘On Carnap's Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief’, Analysis 10, pp. 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cresswell, Max (1990), Review of Mark Richard's Propositional Attitudes, in Canadian Philosophical R Review 10, pp. 430–432.

  7. Crimmins, Robert (1992), Review of Mark Richard's Propositional Attitdes, in Philosophical Review 101, pp. 895–898.

  8. FregeGottlob (1892), ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’ (‘On sense and Reference’), in PeterGeach and MaxBlack, eds. and trans., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 56–78.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FregeGottlob (1980), Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, ed. by GerhardGabriel, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. KaplanDavid (1977), ‘Demonstratives, Draft #2’, in JosephAlmog, JohnPerry, and HowardWettstein, eds., Themes from Kaplan, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. KripkeSaul (1980), Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mackie, Penelope (1991), Review of Mark Richard's Propositional Attitudes, in Philosophical Books 32, pp. 237–240.

  13. PutnamHilary (1975), ‘The Meaning of Meaning’, in KeithGunderson, ed., Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science VII, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oppy, Michael (1991), Review of Mark Richard's Propositional Attitudes, in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69, pp. 362–365.

  15. PetersonPhilip L. (1990), ‘Critical Notice of An Essay on Facts (by K. R. Olson)’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, pp. 610–615.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PetersonPhilip L. (1994a), ‘Attitudinal Opacity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 17, pp. 159–220.

    Google Scholar 

  17. PetersonPhilip L. (1994b), ‘Facts, Events, and Semantic Emphasis in Causal Statements’, The Monist 77, pp. 492–496.

    Google Scholar 

  18. PetersonPhilip L. (1995a), ‘Are Some Propositions Empirically Necessary?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  19. PetersonPhilip L. (1995b), ‘Which Universals Are Laws?’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72, pp. 492–496.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Segal, Martin (1991), Review of Mark Richard's Propositional Attitudes, in Mind 100, pp. 408–410.

  21. SosaErnest (1970), ‘Propositional Attitudes De Re and De Dicto’, Journal of Philosophy 67, pp. 883–896.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. DennettDaniel C. (1987), The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DretskeFred (1988), Explaining Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GoldmanAlvin (1970), A Theory of Human Action, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MeleAlfred R. (1987), Irrationality, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MeleAlfred R. (1992), Springs of Action, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MeleAlfred R. (1995), Autonomous Agents, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mele, Alfred R. (forthcoming), ‘Motivation: Essentially Motivation-Constituting Attitudes’, Philosophical Review.

  8. NagelThomas (1970), The Possibility of Altruism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SchifferStephen (1976), ‘A Paradox of Desire’, American Philosophical Quarterly 13: 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. WilliamsBernard (1979), ‘Internal and External Reasons’, in R.Harrison, ed., Rational Action, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. WilliamsBernard (1989), ‘Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame’, Logos 10: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BlockNed (1986), ‘Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology’, in P.French, T.Uehling, and H.Wettstein, eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 10: Studies in the Philosophy of Mind, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 615–678.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ChurchlandPaul M. (1991), ‘Some Reductive Strategies in Cognitive Neurobiology’, in P. M.Churchland, A Neurocomputational Perspective, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 77–110.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ChurchlandPaul M. (1995), The Engine of Reason; the Seat of the Soul, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ColeDavid (1990), ‘Functionalism and Inverted Spectra’, Synthese 82, pp. 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DavidsonDonald (1984a), ‘Truth and Meaning’, in D.Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. DavidsonDonald (1984b), ‘Reply to Foster’, in D.Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DavidsonDonald (1984c), ‘Radical Interpretation’, in D.Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DennettDaniel C. (1981), ‘Intentional Systems’, in D. C.Dennett, Brainstorms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel C.Dennett (1987), The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DevittMichael and SterelnyKim (1987), Language and Reality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. FodorJerry A. (1990), A Theory of Content and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LeporeErnest and FodorJerry (1993), ‘Précis of Holism: A Shopper's Guide’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53, pp. 637–640.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LewisDavid (1983), ‘Radical Interpretation’, in D.Lewis, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  14. QuineW. V. O. (1953), ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in W. V. O.Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Agre Philip E., and ChapmanDavid (1987), ‘Pengi: An Implementation of a Theory of Activity’, Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87, Seattle), Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 268–272.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BrooksRodney A. (1991), ‘Intelligence without Representation’, Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DrescherGary L. (1991), Made-Up Minds: A Constructivist Approach to Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. EdelmanGerard M. (1987), Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FreemanWalter J., and SkardaC. A. (1990), ‘Representations: Who Needs Them?’, in J. L.McGaugh et al., eds., Brain Organization and Memory Cells, Systems and Circuits, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 375–380.

    Google Scholar 

  6. HofstadterDouglas R. (1984), ‘The Copycat Project: An Experiment in Nondeterminism and Creative Analogies’, Al Memo 755, Cambridge, MA: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HollandJohn H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, John V. (1987), ‘Idea for a Mind’, SIGART Newsletter, No. 181 (July), pp. 23–26.

  9. KanervaPentti (1988), Sparse Distributed Memory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MaesPattie (1991), Designing Autonomous Agents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MinskyMarvin (1985), Society of Mind, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  12. NewellAllen (1990), Unified Theories of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. OrnsteinRobert (1986), Multimind, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WilsonStewart W. (1991), ‘The Animat Path to AI’, in Jean-ArcadyMeyer and Stewart W.Wilson (eds.), From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. WinogradTerry, and FloresFernando (1986), Understanding Computers and Cognition, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BlockNed (1980), ‘Troubles with Functionalism’, in NedBlock (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BodenMargaret (1987), Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. 2nd expanded edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (1st edition, 1977, Harvester Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. BodenMargaret (1988), Computer Models of Mind, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BornRainer (1987), Artifical Intelligence: The Case Against, New York: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BroadbentDonald (1993), The Simulation of Human Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  6. CrockettLarry (1994), The Turing Test and the Frame Problem: AI's Mistaken Understanding of Intelligence, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  7. FetzerJames (1991), Philosophy and Cognitive Science, New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  8. FodorJerry and PylyshynZenon (1988), ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’, Cognition 28: 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. GarnhamAlan (1987), Artificial Intelligence: An Introduction, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HaugelandJohn (1985), Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LucasJ. R. (1961), ‘Minds, Machines, and Gödel’, Philosophy 36: 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McClintockAlexander (1995), The Convergence of Machine and Human Nature, Brookfield, VI: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MorelliRalph; BrownW. Miller; AnselmiDina; HaberlandtKarl; and LloydDan (1992), Minds, Brains, and Computers, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  14. PenroseRoger (1989), The Emperor's New Mind, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. PenroseRoger (1994), Shadows of the Mind, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. RapaportWilliam J. (1986), ‘Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: A Course Outline’, Teaching Philosophy 9: 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  17. RobinsonWilliam (1992), Computers, Minds, and Robots, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. WeizenbaumJoseph (1976), Computer Power and Human Reason, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BarsalouLawrence W. (1993), ‘Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts’, in A. F.Collins et al. (eds.), Theories of Memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 29–102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BlockNed (1980), ‘Troubles with Functionalism’, in NedBlock (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CrutchfieldJames P. (1994), ‘The Calculi of Emergence’, Physica D 75, pp. 11–54.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FodorJerry (1975), The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HaugelandJohn (1989), ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Western Mind’, in J.Brink and C.Haden (eds.). The Computer and the Brain: Perspectives on Human and Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolen, J. (1994), Exploring the Computational Capabilities of Recurrent Neural Networks, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Ohio State University.

  7. McGinnColin (1993), Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. PiagetJean (1952), The Origins of Intelligence in Children, New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. WildeDouglass J. and BeightlerCharles (1967), Foundations of Optimization, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. AchinsteinPeter (1983), The Nature Of Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, Charles Eugene (1991), Direct Memory Access Parsing, Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.

  3. OwensChristopher (1988), ‘Domain-Independent Prototype Cases for Planning’, in JanetKolodner, ed., Case-Based Reasoning: Proceedings of a Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (Clearwater Beach, FL), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 302–311.

    Google Scholar 

  4. RiesbeckChristopher K., and SchankRoger C. (1989), Inside Case-Based Reasoning, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SchankRoger C. (1986), Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics and Languages, Michigan State University, 48824-1027, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Barbara Abbott

  2. Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, 48824-1027, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Barbara Abbott

  3. Program in Applied Linguistics, Boston University, 02215, Boston, MA, USA

    Annette Herskovits

  4. Department of Philosophy, Syracuse University, 541 Hall of Languages, 13244-1170, Syracuse, NY, USA

    Philip L. Peterson

  5. Department of Philosophy, Davidson College, 28036, Davidson, NC, USA

    Alfred R. Mele

  6. Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota, 55812, Duluth, MN, USA

    David J. Cole

  7. Department of Electrical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, H4T 2C8, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Daniel Crevier

  8. Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, T6G 2E5, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Francis Jeffry Pelletier

  9. Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, T6G 2E5, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Francis Jeffry Pelletier

  10. Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, T6G 2E5, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Istvan S. N. Berkeley

  11. Biological Computation Project, University of Alberta, T6G 2E5, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Istvan S. N. Berkeley

  12. Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, 02254, Waltham, MA, USA

    Brendan J. Kitts

  13. Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, Manchester, U.K.

    Mike Brown & George Paliouras

Authors
  1. Barbara Abbott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annette Herskovits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philip L. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alfred R. Mele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David J. Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniel Crevier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Francis Jeffry Pelletier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Istvan S. N. Berkeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Brendan J. Kitts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mike Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. George Paliouras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbott, B., Herskovits, A., Peterson, P.L. et al. Book reviews. Mind Mach 6, 239–285 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391288

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391288

Search

Navigation