Skip to main content
Log in

Qualia and vagueness

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I present two arguments against the thesis that we experience qualia. I argue that if we experienced qualia then these qualia would have to be essentially vague entities. And I then offer two arguments, one a reworking of Gareth Evans' argument against the possibility of vague objects, the other a reworking of the Sorites argument, to show that no such essentially vague entities can exist. I consider various objections but argue that ultimately they all fail. In particular I claim that the stock responses to the Sorites argument fail against my reworking of the argument because they require us to make a distinction between a determinate reality and how that reality appears to us, whereas in the case of qualia we can make no such distinction. I conclude that there can be no such things as qualia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bochvar, D.: 1939, ‘On a Three-valued Logical Calculus and its Application to the Analysis of Contradictories’, Matematiceskij Sbornik 4.

  • Clark, P.: 1987, ‘The Truth about Heaps’, Analysis 47, 177–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.: 1966, Theory of Knowledge, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.: 1985, ‘Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States’, Journal of Philosophy 82, 8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1988, ‘Quining Qualia’, in Marcel and Bisiach (eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 42–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1995, Naturalizing the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, C.: 1968, ‘Moore's Refutation of Idealism’, in Schillp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, Opencourt, La Salle, pp. 225–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1975, ‘Wang's Paradox’, Synthese 30, 301–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, D.: 1992, ‘Validity, Uncertainty, and Vagueness’, Analysis 52, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.: 1978, ‘Can there be Vague Objects?’, Analysis 38, 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K.: 1975, ‘Vagueness, Truth, and Logic’, Synthese 30, 265–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, B.: 1988, ‘Vagueness and Identity’, Analysis 48, 128–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goguen, J.: 1969, ‘The Logic of Inexact Concepts’, Synthese 19, 325–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, D.: 1994, ‘Why Higher-Order Vagueness is a Psuedo Problem’, Mind 103, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, B.: 1989, ‘Is Vague Identity Incoherent?’, Analysis 49, 103–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S.: 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, H.: 1990, ‘Vague Identity Yet Again’, Analysis 50, 157–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Over, D.: 1989, ‘Vague Objects and Identity’, Analysis 49, 197–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1983, ‘Vagueness and Alternative Logic’, in Realism and Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 285–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1985, ‘A Quick Read is a Wrong Wright’, Analysis 45, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, M.: 1995, Paradoxes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, M. and T. Williamson: 1994, ‘Sorites’, in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D.: 1981, ‘Illusions and Sense Data’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, 371–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.: 1987, ‘Intuitionism and Sorites’, Analysis 47, 179–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S.: 1975, ‘Functionalism and Qualia’, Philosophical Studies 27, 291–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S.: 1991, ‘Qualia and Conciousness’, Mind 100, 507–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.: 1962, ‘Sensations and Brain Processes’, in Chappell (ed.), The Philosophy of Mind, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, T.: 1960, ‘Sense Without Denotation’, Analysis 20, 125–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, R.: 1988, Blindspots, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M.: 1994, ‘Why the Vague Need not be Higher-Order Vague’, Mind 103, 43–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1966, ‘Singular Terms, Truth Value Gaps, and Free Logic’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 136–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gulick, R.: 1989, ‘What Difference does Conciousness Make’, Philosophical Topics 17, 211–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gulick, R.: 1993, ‘Understanding the Phenomenal Mind: Are We All Just Armadillos?’, in Davis and Humphries (eds.), Conciousness, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggens, D.: 1986, ‘On Singling Out an Object Determinately’, in Petit and McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought and Context, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 169–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T.: 1992, ‘Vagueness and Ignorence’, Supplementary Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66, 145–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T.: 1994, Vagueness, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1975, ‘On the Coherence of Vague Predicates’, Synthese 30, 325–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1976, ‘Language Mastery and the Sorites Paradox’, in Evans and McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 248–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1992, ‘Is Higher Order Vagueness Coherent?’, Analysis 53, 129–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. and Read, S.: 1985, ‘Hairier Than Putnam Thought’, Analysis 45, 285–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank the referees and Leopold Stubenberg for their help and comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Everett, A. Qualia and vagueness. Synthese 106, 205–226 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413700

Keywords

Navigation