Skip to main content
Log in

Paradoxes of fulfillment

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • N. Asher and H. Kamp, 1986, “The Knower's Paradox and Representational Theories of Attitudes,” in J. Halpern (ed.),Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge. Los Angeles: Morgan Kaufmann, 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Asher and H. Kamp, 1988, “Self-Reference, Attitudes and Paradox,” in R. Turner and G. Chierchia (ed.),Property Theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bonevac and T. K. Seung, 1988, “Conflict in Practical Reasoning,”Philosophical Studies 53, 315–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Burge, 1979, “Semantical Paradox,”The Journal of Philosophy 76, 169–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Chellas, 1980,Modal Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dummett, 1978, “Truth,” inTruth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Gupta, 1982, “Truth and Paradox,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Gupta, 1987, “The Meaning of Truth,” in E. LePore (ed.),New Directions in Semantics. London: Academic Press, 453–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Herzberger, 1982, “Naive Semantics and the Liar Paradox,”Journal of Philosophy 79, 479–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Herzberger, 1982, “Notes on Naive Semantics,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 61–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. H. Hodgson, 1967,The Consequences of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Koons, 1987,Analogues of the Liar Paradox in Systems of Epistemic Logic Representing Meta-mathematical Reasoning and Strategic Rationality in Non-cooperative Games. PhD dissertation: University of California at Los Angeles.

  • R. Koons, 1988a, “A Formalization of Burge's Solution to the Liar,” manuscript.

  • R. Koons, 1988b, “A Representational Account of Mutual Belief,” manuscript.

  • S. Kripke, 1975, “Outline of a Theory of Truth,”Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. B. Marcus, 1982, “Moral Dilemmas and Consistency,”Journal of Philosophy 77, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Martinich, 1983, “A Pragmatic Solution to the Liar Paradox,”Philosophical Studies 43, 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Montague, 1963, “Syntactical Treatments of Modality, with Corollaries on Reflection Principles and Finite Axiomatizability,”Acta Philosophica Fennica, Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics, 153–167. Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.),Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 286–302.

  • C. Parsons, 1974, “The Liar Paradox,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 381–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Regan, 1980,Utilitarianism and Cooperation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Thomason, 1980, “A Note on Syntactical Treatments of Modality,”Synthese 44, 391–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Williams, 1973, “Ethical Consistency,” inProblems of the Self. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonevac, D. Paradoxes of fulfillment. J Philos Logic 19, 229–252 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00556635

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00556635

Navigation