Skip to main content
Log in

Sequent-systems and groupoid models. I

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to connect the proof theory and the model theory of a family of propositional logics weaker than Heyting's. This family includes systems analogous to the Lambek calculus of syntactic categories, systems of relevant logic, systems related toBCK algebras, and, finally, Johansson's and Heyting's logic. First, sequent-systems are given for these logics, and cut-elimination results are proved. In these sequent-systems the rules for the logical operations are never changed: all changes are made in the structural rules. Next, Hubert-style formulations are given for these logics, and algebraic completeness results are demonstrated with respect to residuated lattice-ordered groupoids. Finally, model structures related to relevant model structures (of Urquhart, Fine, Routley, Meyer, and Maksimova) are given for our logics. These model structures are based on groupoids parallel to the sequent-systems. This paper lays the ground for a kind of correspondence theory for axioms of logics with implication weaker than Heyting's, a correspondence theory analogous to the correspondence theory for modal axioms of normal modal logics.

The first part of the paper, which follows, contains the first two sections, which deal with sequent-systems and Hubert-formulations. The second part, due to appear in the next issue of this journal, will contain the third section, which deals with groupoid models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. R. Anderson andN. D. Belnap, Jr.,Entailement: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. D. Belnap, Jr,Display Logic,Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982), pp. 375–417.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Božić,A Contribution to the Semantics of Relevant Logics (in Serbo-Croatian), Doctoral Dissertation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Buszkowski,Completeness results for Lambek syntactic calculus,Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 32 (1986), pp. 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. van Dalen,Logic and Structure, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Došen,Sequent-systems for modal logic,The Journal of Symbolic Logic (50) (1985), pp. 149–168.

  7. K. Došen,A completeness theorem for the Lambek calculus of syntactic categories,Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 31 (1985), pp. 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Fine,Models for entailment,Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1974), pp. 347–372.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Fuchs,Partially Ordered Algebraic Systems, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Gentzen,Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen,Mathematische Zeitschrift 39 (1934–35), pp. 176–210, 405–431 [English translation in:The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969].

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Iseki andS. Tanaka,An introduction to the theory of BCK-algebras,Mathematica Japonica 23 (1978), pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Iseki,BCK-algebras with condition (S),Mathematica Japonica 24 (1979), pp. 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Lambek,The mathematics of sentence structure,The American Mathematical Monthly 65 (1958), pp. 154–170.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Lambek,On the calculus of syntactic types, in: R. Jacobson, ed.,Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, Proc. 12th Symp. Appl. Math., AMS, Providence, R.I., 1961, pp. 166–178, 264–265.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. L. Maksimova,A semantics for the calculus E of entailment,Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 2 (1973), pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. K. Meyer andM. A. McRobbie,Multisets and relevant implication, I and II,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (1982), pp. 107–139, 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Ono andY. Komori,Logics without the contraction rule,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1985), pp. 169–201.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Palasiński,On BCK-algebras with the operation (S),Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 13 (1984), pp. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. N. Prior,Formal Logic, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Rasiowa andR. Sikorski,The Mathematics of Metamathematics, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Routley andR. K. Meyer,The semantics of entailment I, in: H. Leblanc, ed.,Truth, Syntax, Modality, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, pp. 199–243.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Routley andR. K. Meyer,The semantics of entailment II,Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), pp. 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Routley andR. K. Meyer,The semantics of entailment III,Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), pp. 192–208.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Urquhart,Semantics for relevant logics,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1972), pp. 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dj. Vukomanović,Implication and Lattices (in Serbo-Croatian), Doctoral Dissertation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Došen, K. Sequent-systems and groupoid models. I. Stud Logica 47, 353–385 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00671566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00671566

Keywords

Navigation