Skip to main content
Log in

Computing volume descriptions from sparse 3-D data

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach is presented to describing objects as generalized cones (GCs) starting from sparse, imperfect 3-D data, such as may be obtained from stereo. Though some previous systems have been developed for generalized cone descriptions, they are not good at handling imperfect and sparse data. In our approach, we first label the boundaries of the generalized cone as axial contour generators and terminators. We examine the general properties of these labels/features. In addition, we note that for aLinearStraightHomogeneousGeneralizedCone (LSHGC), the axial contour generators are coplanar. We use these properties in our search for labeling the GC boundaries; the search is based on the hypothesize and verify paradigm. The axis, cross-section, and cross-section function of the GC are then deduced from the labeled boundaries. The system described has been tested on a number of synthetic and real scenes of LSHGCs and some results are presented. We conclude by indicating how the system could be extended to more complex objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.L. Waltz, “Generating semantic descriptions from drawings of scenes with shadows,” Tech. Rep. AI-TR-271, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass., November 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Mackworth, “Interpreting pictures of polyhedral scenes,”Artificial Intelligence, 4: 121–137, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Malik, “Interpreting line drawings of curved objects.” PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1985.

  4. R.C. Bolles and P. Horaud, “3DPO: A three-dimensional part orientation system,”Intern. J. Robotics Res., 5(3):3–26, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.E.L. Grimson and T. Lozano-Perez, “Model-based recognition and localization from sparse range and tactile data.”Inter. J. Robotics Res., 3(3):3–35, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.A. Brooks, “Symbolic reasoning among 3-D models and 2-D images,” Tech. Rept. AIM-343, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Stanford, Calif., June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.E.L. Grimson,From Images to Surfaces: A Computational Study of the Human Early Visual System. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Terzopoulos, “Multiresolution computation of visiblesurface representations,” PhD thesis, MIT, Departments of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, January 1984.

  9. A. Pentland, “Recognition by parts.” InFirst International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 612–620, June 1987.

  10. R. Bajcsy and F. Solina, “Three dimensional object representation revisited.” InFirst International Conference on computer Vision, pp. 231–240, June 1987.

  11. S.A. Shafer, “Shadow geometry and occluding contours of generalized cylinders,” TECH.REPT. CS-83-131, Carnegie-Mellon University, May 1983.

  12. D.R. Smith and T. Kanade. “Autonomous scene description with range imagery,”Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 35:322–334, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.O. Binford, “Visual perception by computer.” InIEEE Conf. Systems and Controls, Miami, December 1971. Unpublished talk.

  14. R. Nevatia,Machine Perception. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Marr, “Analysis of occluding contour.” InProc. Roy. Soc. London, pp. 441–475, 1977.

  16. R. Nevatia and T.O. Binford, “Description and recognition of complex-curved objects,”Artificial Intelligence, 8: 77–98, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Marr and K. Nishihara, “Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three dimensional shapes.” InProc. Roy. Soc. London, pp. 269–294, 1978.

  18. J. Ponce, D. Chelberg, and W. Mann, “Analytical properties of generalized cylinders and their projections. InProc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 933–941, Los Angeles, Calif., February 1987.

  19. K. Rao and R. Nevatia, “Generalized cone descriptions from sparse 3-D data.” InProc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conf., pp. 256–263, June 1986.

  20. R.A. Arnheim.Art and Visual Perception. University of California Press: Berkeley, Calif., 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Medioni and R. Nevatia, “Segment-based stereo matching,”Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31:2–18, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T.J. Fan, G. Medioni, and R. Nevatia, “Description of surfaces from range data using curvature properties.” InProc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conf., pp. 86–91, June 1986.

  23. G.J. Agin,Representation and Description of Curved Objects. PhD thesis, Stanford University, October 1972.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under contract number F33615-84-K-1404, monitored by the Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Darpa Order No. 3119.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, K., Nevatia, R. Computing volume descriptions from sparse 3-D data. Int J Comput Vision 2, 33–50 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00836280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00836280

Keywords

Navigation