Abstract
In this paper we concentrate on spatial prepositions, more specifically we are interested here in projective prepositions (eg. “in front of”, “to the left of”) which have in the past been treated as semantically uninteresting. We demonstrate that projective prepositions are in fact problematic and demand more attention than they have so far been afforded; after summarising the important components of their meaning, we review the deficiencies of past and current approaches to the decoding problem; that is, predicting what a locative expression used in a particular situation conveys. Finally we present our own approach. Motivated by the shortcomings of contemporary work, we integrate elements of Lang's conceptual representation of objects' perceptual and dimensional characteristics, and the potential field model of object proximity that originated in manipulator and mobile robot path-finding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bierwisch, M. & Lang, E. (1980).Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation. Springer-Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Douglas, S. & Novick, D. (1987). Consistency and Variance in Spatial Reference. In Proceedings ofThe Ninth Annual Cognitive Science Society Meeting, 417–426.
Herskovits, A. (1985). Semantics and Pragmatics of Locative Expressions.Cognitive Science 9: 341–378.
Herskovits, A. (1986).Language and Spatial Cognition — An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Herskovits, A. (1988). Spatial Expression and the Plasticity of Meaning. In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed.)Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 403–427. Benjamins: Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
Kalita, J. & Badler, B. (1991). Interpreting Prepositions Physically. In Proceedings ofThe Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 105–110. Anaheim, CA.
Khatib, O. (1986). Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Modile Robots.The International Journal of Robotics Research 5(1): 90–98.
Lang, E. (1993). A Two-Level Approach to Projective Prepositions. In Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C. (ed)Semantics of Prepositions. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
Maienborn, J. R. (ed.) (1991).Processing Spatial Knowledge in LILOG. IWBS Report 157, IBM Germany.
Retz-Schmidt, G. (1988). Various Views on Spatial Prepositions.AI Magazine 9(2): 95–105.
Schirra, J. R. J. & Stopp, E. (1993). ANTLIMA — A Listener Model with Mental Images. In Proceedings ofThe International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993. Chambery, France.
Talmy, L. (1983). How Language Structures Space. In Pick, H. & Acredolo, L. (ed.)Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application, 225–282. Plenum Press: New York.
Yamada, A., Nishida, T. & Doshita, S. (1988). Figuring out Most Plausible Interpretation from Spatial Descriptions. In Proceedings ofThe 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-88), 764–769.
Yamada, A., Yamamoto, T., Ikeda, H., Nishida, T. & Doshita, S. (1992). Reconstructing Spatial Image From Natural Language Texts. In Proceedings ofThe 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-92), 1279–1283. Nantes, France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olivier, P., Tsujii, JI. Quantitative perceptual representation of prepositional semantics. Artif Intell Rev 8, 147–158 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849071
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849071