Skip to main content
Log in

The DenK-architecture: A fundamental approach to user-interfaces

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present the basic principles underlying the DenK-system, a generic cooperative interface combining linguistic and visual interaction. The system integrates results from fundamental research in knowledge representation, communication, natural language semantics and pragmatics, and object-oriented animation. Our design incorporates a cooperative and knowledgeable electronic assistant that communicates with a user in natural language, and an application domain, which is presented visually. The assistant, that we call thecooperator, has an information state that is represented in a rich form of Type Theory, a formalism that enables us to model the inherent cognitive dynamics of a dialogue participant. Pragmatic issues in man-machine interaction, concerning the use of natural language and knowledge in cooperative communication, are central to our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ahn, R. M. C. (1994).The Database. Internal Report University of Tilburg (to appear).

  • Ahn, R. M. C. & Kolb, H. P. (1990). Discourse Representation Meets Constructive Mathematics. In Kálmán, L. & Pólos, L. (eds.)Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, 105–124. Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt, H. (1991). Introduction to Generalized Type Systems.Journal of Functional Programming 1(2): 125–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beun, R. J. (1990). The Recognition of Dutch Declarative Questions.Journal of Pragmatics 14: 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beun, R. J. (1991). A Framework for Cooperative Dialogues. In Taylor, M. M., Néel, F. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (eds.)Proceedings of the Second Venaco Workshop on the Structure of Multimodal Dialogue. Maratea, Italy.

  • Van Benthem, J. (1991). Reflections on Epistemic Logic.Logique et Analyse 133–134: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghuis, T. (1993). Interpreting Modal Natural Deduction in Type Theory. In de Rijke, M. (ed.)Diamonds and Defaults, 67–102. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • De Bruijn, N. G. (1980). A Survey of the Project Automath. In Seldin & Hindley (eds.)To H. B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalisms, 579–606. Academic Press.

  • Bunt, H. C. (1989). Information Dialogues as Communicative Action in Relation to Partner Modelling and Information Processing. In Taylor, M. M., Néel, F. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (eds.)The Structure of Multimodel Dialogue, 47–73. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H. C. (1993). Dynamic Interpretation and Dialogue Theory. In Black, W. J. (ed.)Abduction, Belief and Context (to appear).

  • Burger, J. D. & Marshall, R. J. (1993). The Application of Natural Language Models to Intelligent Multimedia. In Mayburry, M. (ed.)Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, 174–196. The MIT Press: Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coquand, T. (1985).Une théorie des Constructions. Thèse de troisième cycle. Université de Paris VII: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremers, A. H. M. (1994). Referring in a Shared Workspace. In Brouwer, M. & Harrington, T. (eds.)Basics of Man-Machine Communication for the Design of Educational Systems, 71–78. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, H. B. & Feys R. (1958).Combinatory Logic, Vol. 1, North Holland Publishing Company.

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.)Speech Acts. Syntax and semantics, Vol. 11, 41–58. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. J. (1978). Discourse Analysis. In Walker, D. (ed.)Understanding Spoken Language, 229–345, Elsevier North-Holland: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmink, L. & Ahn, R. M. C. (1991). Goal Oriented Proof Construction in Type Theory. In Huet, G. & Plotkin, G. (eds.)Logical Frameworks, 120–148. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1989). Metaphors for Interface Design. In Taylor, M. M., Néel, F. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (eds.)The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue, 11–28. North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, J. A. W. (1981). A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. In Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. (eds.)Formal Methods in the Study of Language, 277–322. Mathematisch Centrum: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, J. A. W. & Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäenpää, P. & Ranta, A. (1990). An Implementation of Intuitionistic Categorial Grammar. In Kálmán, L. & Pólos, L. (eds.)Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, 299–318. Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. (1984).Intuitionistic Type Theory. Bibliopolis: Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (1988)Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall International.

  • Neal, J. G. & Shapiro, S. C. (1991). Intelligent Multimedia Interface Technology. In Sullivan, J. W. & Taylor, S. W. (eds.)Intelligent User Interfaces, 11–43. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Overveld, C. W. A. M. (1991). The Generalized Display Processor as an Approach to Real Time Interactive 3-D Computer Animation.The Journal of Visualisation and Computer Animation 2(1): 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, E. A. J. (1994). LOOKS:Syntax and Semantics. Computing Science Note. Eindhoven University of Technology (to appear).

  • Searle, J. R. (1969).Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza, C. S. (1993). The Semiotic Engineering of User Interface Languages.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 39: 753–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlster, W., André, E., Finkler, W., Profitlich, H.-J. & Rist, T. (1993). Plan-Based Integration of Natural Language and Graphics Generation.Artificial Intelligence 63: 387–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. D., Sedlock, D., Binot, J-L. & Falzon, P. (1991). An Architecture for Multimodal Dialogue. In Taylor, M. M., Néel, F. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (eds.)Proceedings of the Second Venaco Workshop on the Structure of Multimodal Dialogue. Maratea, Italy.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Authors' addresses: R. M. C. Ahn and H. C. Bunt, Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence (ITK), Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands, e-mail: r.m.c.ahn@kub.nl, h.c.bunt@kub.nl; R. J. Beun, Institute for Perception Research (IPO), P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands, e-mail: rjbeun@prl.philips.nl; T. Borghuis and C. W. A. M. van Overveld, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, e-mail: tijn@win.tue.nl, wsinkvo@info.win.tue.nl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahn, R.M.C., Beun, R.J., Borghuis, T. et al. The DenK-architecture: A fundamental approach to user-interfaces. Artif Intell Rev 8, 431–445 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849729

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849729

Key words